Why do we say "because the root organs of all beings are different, and the fate is said"?
If we want to understand this problem, we have to understand what it means to be "different in roots".
I believe that many of our friends understand that the so-called "root device" does not refer to IQ, and in fact, what we want to talk about here is that although we talk like this, saying that "root organ is not IQ", but because the vast majority of people do not understand what is the real "root device", so saying "root device" is like talking about turtle hair and rabbit horns, and cannot be observed truthfully.
What does this mean?
This is to say that although many of our friends have heard others say that "the root organ is not IQ", in their cognition, there is only such a concept as "IQ has a high or low", but there is no real meaning of "root device", so although they say that the "root instrument" of practice is not the same as IQ, but based on the understanding of "IQ", they have created a "root instrument" similar to "IQ" that can be judged by its level. The result is obvious, because the so-called "root apparatus" does not have a unified standard such as "IQ test", so the vast majority of people will label others as "good or bad root apparatus" according to their own likes and dislikes.
We all know that Buddhism says that "the Dharma is equal, and there is no superiority", and the same is true of the "root organs", we only understand that "because the root organs of all beings are different and follow the fate", but no sage has ever said that "the root organs of all beings are good or bad", if anyone says this, then he is talking nonsense.
Is it better to talk about the Dharma and the Tao than to talk about "what to eat tonight"?
If anyone thinks so, then he must not have to eat. At the same time, we would like to point out here that the vast majority of practitioners "think" this way, but they just think that they don't think so.
Why do we say that?
It's like we say that "the root organ is not equal to the IQ", and creating a "root device" that is higher than the "IQ" is in fact no better than talking about the "IQ" directly, just as creating a so-called "profound truth" is no better than directly talking about "what to eat tonight".
Our people like to engage in superstition, and he himself still thinks that he is the right believe, in fact, the so-called superstition is to "stir things together can not be clear", if you will be disturbed by fate, you have to talk to him to distinguish between right and wrong, then he will immediately say to you "emptiness is color, color is emptiness, you play the logic game, is the phase".
We have found such a chaotic phenomenon, that is, many people have cultivated a so-called line, and they cannot lift the "tools" in their hands to do things.
Although we say that "the law is equal," we have never said that "the law is useless," just like a sword that can be used not only to invade other people's homes, but also to defend our own homes.
Now it's a good thing, we found that many people admit that they are dead, as long as they see the sword, they say that everything is a problem with the sword, as long as the person who holds the sword has a problem. You say that they don't pick up a sword themselves, and we say that it is the unity of knowledge and action, but the problem is that they themselves also use a sword to cut people around, and this sword is called "sword of words" in most cases.
What do you mean? This is to say that there are many people who actually have no intention of criticizing the "sword" at all, what they really criticize is those "swords" that they don't have, and the way to criticize is to use the sword in their hands to invade other people's homes, and their own interpretation of this is "white horses are not horses".
This is like a person who has mastered logical thinking, and he can't wait to carry the sword of "logic" to cut people at the first opportunity, and once he loses this sword, he can't talk to others (climbing outward will always kick the iron plate), he immediately condemns the sword of logic, and asks the "Shang Fang sword" of "human feelings" to turn around and cut those who use logical thinking, as if their so-called "human feelings" is "If others don't take care of my feelings, they don't understand human feelings." ”
So, we talk about all living beings having only likes and dislikes, regardless of the truth
This is more like the truth.
It's like when we say that "all scientific laws are derived from emotion", which may be difficult for many people to understand, but in fact it is true, because any scientific law is an understanding of reality, what is this understanding?
It is based on the understanding of all phenomena that can be observed by our subjective experience, and in fact any explanation is fundamentally based on subjective experience, which in any case cannot be the product of "pure reason".
If we talk about the only principle that is close to "pure reason", it is nothing more than "everything that can be said is not the truth", and the reason why we say "close to" is because of the nature of human beings to "see the seams" based on likes and dislikes
They use the phrase "everything that can be said is not the truth" to actively deny those who do not provoke them, and the reason is simply that the behavior of these people "doing their own thing on their own turf" is in their eyes.
In other words, the vast majority of people in this world can't see others good, this is because they can't hold a better sword in their own hands, so others shouldn't be able either, so there is such a saying that "the root apparatus is good or bad".
After all, whatever makes me "uneasy", I have to find all kinds of reasons to say that his "root organ is not good".
The fact is actually that simple, it is precisely because of this, so we only need to see a person outside who takes the initiative to climb you, and his sincerity is not sincere, you can see at a glance, this does not need to be thought about at all.
Therefore, when we talk about "leveling the world", we are not talking about a kind of "extinction view", and we are not talking about bulldozing all the inequalities in the whole world (who wants to shovel the mountains and fill them in the canyon?). Instead, it flattens out all the "unsettled" states. For example, if you do things unfairly, then you have to make up for it, otherwise you will wait for the retribution of light karma, because the people in this world do not care about the size of the profit at all, but you have to make him feel "happy", once the "heart is not good", he is very likely to vent all the unhappiness on you alone for a while.
Again, we must emphasize that everyone's actions are based on subjective likes and dislikes, and there is no difference between practitioners, including practitioners, but only that practitioners are able to balance their likes and dislikes with each other and make the world peaceful, rather than bulldozing the world.
If someone is cut to the table when something happens, saying that the sword is wrong and that they shouldn't hold the sword, then it's like saying that everyone should be ordained as a monk in their cultivation.
What are the truly terrifying obstacles in practice?
What's really scary is that we're laughing at other people's "why don't you eat minced meat" arguments, and at the same time making the same mistake ourselves in another area that we don't see yet.
For example, a person can achieve "unity of knowledge and action" in the field he specializes in, but as long as he changes the situation, he will not be able to do it immediately, and then he will take the initiative to slash at others with his "sword", thinking that he is holding the sword of justice.
The sword is only the sword of justice when it is used for legitimate defense, and all evil is not the fault of the sword, but all evil is just a person holding a sword to cut across the boundary, and a thief shouting to catch a thief.
We say that the vast majority of people pretend not to see this, otherwise a catastrophe like the Crusades would not have happened.
So, back to our topic for today—
What is "the saying that comes with fate because of the difference in the root organs of all beings"?
Can a person with no culture at all read this article?
If you see it, then it's really fate, of course, in the vast majority of cases, a person like this can't be found here.
Therefore, when we talk about different root organs, we are talking about different situations, and the different situations here have nothing to do with the "level of IQ", and we only talk about chance, and the maturity of chance requires common karma.
In other words, the person who comes to me must have a part of his karma with me, so he can see the part of me that belongs to "himself", in other words, he sees a part of me and a part of himself, and only this part is the same.
Again, this does not mean whether this part is good or evil, because the scene before us here and now is just a sword, and whether this sword is good or evil depends entirely on the "viewer's" own likes and dislikes, not on the sword itself. Therefore, when we talk about different root tools, we are only talking about the different forms of this sword, and as for how to use this sword to cross people, "the benevolent see the benevolent, and the wise see the wise", because my hands have long since left the hilt, just waiting for you to arrive, and your hands determine whether the blade of this sword is pointed at you, at me, or at someone else
You take a look, you understand, and you turn away, maybe you take the sword with you, maybe you take away your true self.