More than 20 celebrities from Western countries from France met in Paris for 26 days, showing Russia their attempts to "pro-Ukraine" alliance.
The meeting did not give new promises of assistance, but rather released sensitive information that had never been seen before.
France's Macron said at a press conference:"We will do everything in our power to prevent Russia from winning the war", and said"There will be no Western troops entering Ukraine in the future"。
* Screenshots. France "sent troops" to "frighten" the allies.
As soon as this remark came out, the audience was in an uproar.
The New York Times pointed out that at the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Macron was criticized by his Western allies for being too gentle with Russia, and now, he has become Ukraine's "most candid supporter."
This is the first time that Macron has so publicly announced to the outside world that he may send troops. However, they did not reach a consensus on this issue.
Here's what the New York Times said.
According to Western ** reports, Macron's latest statement goes beyond the scope of allies to help Ukraine. Countries have stated that they will never send troops to Ukraine.
At the same time, the leaders of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty are "distancing" Macron's rhetoric.
Here's a photo from The Guardian.
Slovak Prime Minister Fizo called the Paris summit a "war conference."
He said before the talks that there was evidence that NATO and some European Union member states were preparing to reach a bilateral agreement on Ukraine, which gave him a "chill down his spine" and risked an escalation of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
I can't tell you that Slovakia, as a member of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Body, is unlikely to send troops to Ukraine. ”
Fizo also believes that France's convening of this summit, as he said, is a mistake in the Ukrainian strategy.
* From a report by Reuters.
In response to Macron's speech, Dmitry Peskov, a Russian journalist, said that Russia's sending troops to Ukraine is an inevitable direct confrontation with NATO.
* Kosachev, vice chairman of the meeting, also warned on the same day, saying that if NATO sends troops to Ukraine, it will be regarded as a war between Russia and Ukraine, or a war against Russia, causing a "catastrophic situation".
The picture shows a message from Russia Today**.
If the question is whether sending troops to Ukraine would cause instability in Europe, would it be better to discuss "consensus building" alone?
The answer is yes.
Before the Paris summit, European powers regarded the Russia-Ukraine war as their own thorny problem, but each with its own evil intentions, the plan of "US withdrawal" has quietly taken shape.
Britain, France and Germany recently signed a 10-year military cooperation agreement with Ukraine, which includes military support and military cooperation. However, although Britain and France have provided long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine, Germany has not yet made any moves.
According to Ukraine's "Kyiv Independent", German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said on the 22nd that he would no longer provide Ukraine with German-made "Taurus" long-range cruise missiles with a range of up to 500 meters. Germany fears that these things will be used against Russia.
At the table, it's the United States, and it's Europe on the menu.
Coincidentally, when it comes to the sensitive **, the United States directly "picks on the son", compared with Germany, these two countries are much bolder.
The United States reported that Biden is considering providing Ukraine with longer-range US strategic missiles. If the U.S. Congress approves new appropriations for Ukraine, this type of ** will be included in the list of first aid to Ukraine**; Otherwise, the United States can ask its allies to provide Ukraine with a set of anti-tank ** "on behalf of the United States", and then obtain supplies from the United States.
Screenshot from NBC.
Why is Biden's administration taking risks?
Chris Hedges, an experienced journalist in the United States and former director of the Middle East office of The New York Times, said in an interview: "The United States does not want the war between Russia and Ukraine to end. ”
A guy named Chris Hedges.
In fact, the two-year-old conflict between Russia and Ukraine remains unresolved, and this is exactly what the United States "does not want" to see.
But even with $100 billion in U.S. military support, Ukrainian forces have failed to emerge victorious in the escalating fighting. The atmosphere of the "Russian crisis" created by the United States has made Europe worried and worried about its own security.
Against this backdrop, European countries have spent a lot of money to gain control of their own security from US-made arms in order to maintain their own security. And the United States has gained enough benefits from this. European countries have blindly severed oil and gas deals with Russia and handed over their rights to the United States out of fear.
Wall Street **" recently wrote an article pointing out that after the end of the Russia-Ukraine war, the United States ** Fire Company received a large number of orders, and Europe became the main customer.
Some U.S. *** confirmed that 60.7 billion of the new additional 95 billion defense budget will be allocated to Ukraine, of which 64% will be used for the U.S. military industry.
Here's a photo from Wall Street.
At the same time, the disruption of Russian natural gas** has greatly increased Europe's demand for American LNG.
The United States is the world's largest exporter of LNG, with two-thirds of its production sold to Europe. U.S. LNG exports are expected to double by 2030.
Here's what the New York Post said.
Recently, Brinken in the United States has sparked a global "food on the table" debate. Such a reckless statement proves once again the fact that the United States, as a powerful Western country, has seen anyone as a thorn in the side, even its allies.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the United States has an extraordinary appetite and "do not be suffocated by the" democratic "table."
*Appeared in Russia***
In fact, as the "fatigue of helping Ukraine" continues to ferment, more and more European countries realize that continuing to fan the flames will only bring greater risks to themselves, and sacrifice Europe in exchange for another kind of wealth accumulation in the United States.
According to the German newspaper Die Welt, the longer the fighting between Russia and Ukraine lasts, the worse the West's ** will be.