On February 26, 2022, the collective resignation of Palestine ** was announced, just as the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is heating up and Palestine is in internal and external difficulties, it has opened the prelude to the replacement of a new one. In order to understand the background and significance of this event in greater depth, it is necessary to sort out the history and authority of Palestine as a whole. At stake in the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, we have to look at how the situation has evolved, the internal and external pressures exerted on all sides, and the possible prospects for reconciliation in the future.
Since the two-state solution of 1947, the Palestinian territory has been divided into two parts, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, but legal statehood has not yet been achieved. The supreme authority of Palestine was the Palestinian National Authority, which was later renamed the State of Palestine and was Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas. In 2019, Abbas appointed Ashtiyah as prime minister to form Palestine**. However, due to historical issues and disputes over the demarcation of the Palestinian-Israeli border, the fighting has not stopped, which has made Palestine ** highly questionable.
Internal suspicions stem mainly from Israel's military strikes and humanitarian crises, and the Palestinians** have not been active in improving the situation, leading to popular dissatisfaction. On the other hand, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries have also exerted external pressure, hoping to weaken the factional attributes of the country, resolve internal factional struggles, and create conditions for a ceasefire between Palestine and Israel. The United States has even demanded the reorganization of the Palestinian ** through pressure, aiming to establish a ** that can restrain Hamas, and this external pressure has made the ** struggle in a difficult situation.
After the collective resignation of the Palestinians, a new will be born, taken over by non-partisan technocrats, and the new prime minister will be Mustafa. This non-partisan establishment will help to eliminate partisanship and improve the delivery of humanitarian assistance to the Gaza Strip. Mustafa's World Bank experience and ties to the United States have earned him recognition and opened up more possibilities for the operation of the new **. So far, the rise of the new ** has not only brought light to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but also opened up new possibilities for reconciliation in the future.
Hamas and Fatah represent two different political philosophies and approaches in Palestine, with Hamas being more hands-on and inclined towards armed struggle, and Fatah leaning more towards peaceful diplomacy. However, as Israel's military campaign intensifies, the public is more inclined to support Hamas, believing it to be more meaningful and able to deal effectively with Israel's challenges.
If Hamas and Fatah can hold a dialogue and reach a consensus in Moscow, it will have a profound impact on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Once the intra-Palestinian parties are united, reconciliation with Israel will be a powerful catalyst for a settlement of the conflict. Israel's actions will be challenged by internal reconciliation, which is also an important turning point.
Israel's proposed management plan suggests that it will have the right to freedom of movement in the Gaza Strip for an indefinite period of time, which is bound to meet with strong opposition from all Palestinian factions. As a result, Palestinian**, Hamas, and other factions may unite to form a greater counterattack against Israel. If there is real intra-Palestinian unity, Israel will face even more serious challenges, which is also an important symbol of the future of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
At the critical moment when the new ** takes over, the non-partisan technocrats ** are about to come to power, which will have a far-reaching impact on the development of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict between Palestine and Israel. Under internal and external pressure, **'s resignation may be to seek rebirth and change. At this important juncture, all Palestinian parties should unite as one, put aside partisanship and work together to safeguard national interests and people's security. Only in this way can the way be paved for lasting peace in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been mired in a quagmire for a long time, and only through cooperation and consultation can true reconciliation and win-win results be achieved. It is hoped that under the leadership of the new leader, Palestine will usher in a new dawn and contribute to peace and stability in the Middle East.