Recently, Mo Yan's indictment has attracted widespread attention. The development and evolution of this prosecution deserves our in-depth consideration. Although I personally oppose this kind of eye-catching hype, we still need to conduct a true and objective analysis of the incident.
The accuser is a small internet celebrity with more than 200,000 followers, and he is known for""Red Sorghum Family" and "Fat Breasts and Fat Buttocks" beautify the Japanese army invading China and belittle and smear the Chinese people"A lawsuit was filed against Mo Yan for this reason, with a claim amount of up to 1.5 billion, which is the largest claim in the history of Chinese law.
First of all, we need to make it clear that the prosecution may be an abuse of litigation rights. Legal resources should be used to resolve genuine disputes and controversies, not to gain attention and make their presence felt. Litigation is a freedom, but misuse of litigation is a waste of legal resources.
Secondly, the incident caused a huge repercussion on the Internet. Voices for and against Mo Yan intertwined in the comment section, arguing endlessly. Henan netizens think that Mo Yan just told the truth, is he guilty? Guizhou netizens expressed their support for the prosecution, believing that Mo Yan had scandalized China and won the hearts of foreigners. Liaoning netizens paid tribute to Mo Yan and believed that he had the courage to tell the truth and contribute to social progress. The different perspectives show different interpretations of Mo Yan's work and perceptions of freedom of expression.
Such similar events are not uncommon in history. There are many writers in China who have been prosecuted and criticized for their works or speeches, such as Lu Xun and Qian Zhongshu. Literary works tend to generate controversy, and in controversy, people can get more thought and progress. For Mo Yan, it is okay to criticize his work, but it should be criticized by specific words and content, rather than simply attacking.
The impact of the incident on society cannot be ignored. The prosecution has sparked a debate about free speech and has led to a rethinking of what constitutes legitimate speech and how it should be judged and regulated when expressing one's opinion. At the same time, this prosecution also involves the reputation and rights of well-known writers such as Mo Yan, which will have a certain impact on their creation and the reputation of the literary world.
At present, there is no update on the prosecution. Regardless of the final outcome, we should objectively summarize the impact of this event. It will provoke reflection on freedom of expression, intellectual property and literary creation, and serve as a reminder of the effective use of legal resources.
Finally, the question we need to think about further is: how to balance freedom of expression and legal protection? How should we view controversial literature and writers? And how to avoid the abuse of litigation rights and interests and the waste of legal resources? This is a problem that we need to think about and solve together.
In this incident, we need to maintain a calm and objective attitude, not blindly follow the trend, and not make rash comments. Only through rational thinking and discussion can we better promote the progress and development of society.