Who would have thought that the death of Zong Qinghou would push competing mountain spring water to the forefront?
In recent days, not only has the live broadcast room of Mountain Spring Water been washed, but even the founder has been scolded miserably.
The reason for the scolding was that some people said that he had been expelled from Wahaha for speculation.
The whistleblower said that the founder used to be the best businessman in Wahaha Hainan, but he earned the first pot of gold by channeling goods and applying for high freight subsidies, which is not "glorious".
Others labeled him "ungrateful" because of the previous "dispute between mineral water and pure water", calling him a "farmer and a snake".
The "Farmer and the Snake" incident directly led to a sharp drop in mountain spring water3.
I don't know if it's because it fell too much, but yesterday the founder specially published an article "I have three things with the elder of the sect" to respond.
But it's good not to respond, and a response directly makes ** explode.
Why didn't the public buy the founder's clarification?
I read this article, and I can only say that some people are not wronged when they are scolded.
Let's not say that it is inappropriate to call others "teachers and friends" while posting articles to justify their names at special times.
Perhaps, have you ever seen a moral kidnapping as soon as it came up?
What's even more interesting is this sentence: "After 2000, about the dispute between natural water and pure water, in the end, the patriarch and I shook hands and made peace under the witness of the leader. ”
This reminds me of a picture of two children arguing and being forced to reconcile by the teacher.
So is this rapprochement consensual?
I'm afraid only the parties themselves know.
Compared with this, Zhong's clarification of netizens' remarks is the key to the problem.
First, he refuted the statement that "the first pot of gold came from Wahaha", saying that he started by making curtains.
Second, he said that Wahaha's winning product, Babao Porridge, was produced at his suggestion.
Third, he said that he was not fired from Wahaha, let alone received a salary from Wahaha.
In a word, it can be summed up as "I'm not, I don't".
So, this is not only without fault, but even a hero of Wahaha?
What's more worth mentioning is that the day before he posted the article, that is, on the seventh day of the old man Zong, the vice president of Shanquan Water also posted an article accusing netizens of "cyberbullying farmers".
Even in the same way, the vice president also moved out of the words of the elder of the sect as an "endorsement" of riot control.
But these "mountain spring water supporters" who speak similar lines are the so-called "above board competition under the legal framework", right?
And that's not all.
What's even more ironic is that both of them have clarified at such a length, but they have not mentioned anything about the rumors of "Zhong Shaomei" that netizens are hotly discussed.
So, what exactly are you avoiding?
Some people are worthy of being journalists, and their kung fu is perfect.
Well, let's just think that the mountain spring water has been "cyberbullied".
But there are more than these two companies selling water on the market, why is only mountain spring water scolded?
Is it really just because the mountain spring water and Wahaha have some grievances in the past?
Of course not. This small essay of clarification before and after did not stop **, but let more "black history" of mountain spring water be picked up.
For example, in 2021, mountain spring water "overturned" due to the Fukushima white peach incident.
For another example, some dealers reported that the freezer of mountain spring water is not allowed to put Wahaha.
Of course, you can say that this is a commercial rule competitive agreement, but why can't other than Wahaha?
Why can't you find Wahaha pure water in the supermarket now?
Some people say that because of the good water quality, it was bought by the laboratory as royal water.
But is it just because of this?
Now, after the death of Zong Lao, Wahaha has once again entered the public eye.
But as soon as Wahaha's sales skyrocketed, why couldn't anyone sit still?
was "cyberbullied" again, and he stepped on one by one.
Who is stirring up the confrontation?
Just as individuals have the freedom to choose their nationality, as consumers, do we also have the right to choose our favorite brands?
If you like this brand, if you don't like that brand, you just step on one hand?
And if you buy a Wahaha, you will be labeled as "ultra-nationalist" on the platform, who will reason with this?
Why do you support Wahaha?
It can only be said that justice is at ease in the hearts of the people.
We never advocate cyberbullying, and we respect other people's nationalities.
But in the same way, we also have the right to choose products that are of stable and reliable quality, and that we can buy comfortably for decades.
And when you see a lot of Runren entrepreneurs who make money in China and spend money in the United States, you will know how right it is for consumers to vote with their feet at this time.