IntroductionOn February 10, PI Network released a message on its official self-**, the original text is as follows: Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis, one of the founders of PI, was quoted in Microsoft's "2023 Future of Work Report"! His academic work has shown that high-level tasks can be broken down into multi-step action plans by crowdsourcing, allowing people to accomplish more tasks. Head over to slide 10 of the report to see Nicolas in action! A PDF link to the Microsoft report is attached.References to the Microsoft Job Report:By breaking down a large task into multiple subtasks, you can ensure that each person's task is what they are good at, which greatly improves the progress of the overall task.
For example, a large goal, such as running 10,000 meters, can be broken down into multiple smaller goals, allowing everyone to run a short distance. This will help you understand the concept.
In fact, Microsoft cites the academic work of Nicolas Kokkalis in its Future of Work Report 2023. He proposed that high-level tasks could be broken down into crowdsourcing forms of plans for more people to participate in their completion.
The results of the study showed that people completed significantly more tasks through crowdsourcing than with unplanned control conditions. In addition, the combination of NLP algorithms and human intervention can further refine these plans and improve the task completion rate.
NLP, or Natural Language Processing, is a method that uses computer technology to analyze natural language (such as text, speech, etc.), aiming to achieve human-computer interaction and make information management more convenient and efficient.
It is important to note that although Dr. Nicolas popularized the idea of crowdsourcing, he was not the inventor of NLP.
After carefully reading the relevant information, I think that the article being quoted by Microsoft is indeed a noteworthy event, but the discussion within the PI community seems to have overplayed this somewhat by the discussion.
The prevailing view in the community is that Microsoft's citation of Dr. Nicolas**, and even Microsoft's emphasis on Dr. Nicos' ideas, bodes well for the future of Pi Coin.
This view believes that companies like Microsoft can value the PI public chain, and the future of PI is limitless.
However, it seems to me that we need to be rational when interpreting this news.
First,Dr. Nicolas's argument was made in 2013, when he had not yet completed his studies, and this opinion was published in the form of **.
While this view is somewhat forward-looking, it is also important to note that it did not exist in isolation at the time, but was one of many discussions.
In fact, Dr. Nicolas proposed a form of crowdsourcing in 2013 that is mainly used in the mailbox field to deal with spam.
While this shows his insight into future trends, we can't overstate the impact of this event on the future of the Pi Network.
Therefore, I think we should remain calm and look at this incident rationally, both acknowledging Dr. Nicolas' contribution and not overexaggerating its impact on the future of the PI Network. In this way, the actual value and prospects of the PI Network can be better understood and evaluated.
Second,Report on Microsoft's work in the field of AI in 2023. Page 10 of the report's 41 pages mentions Dr. Nicolas and other scholars on natural language algorithms and a tiny technology in the field of computing.
This shows Microsoft's extensive research and layout in the field of AI, but it does not mean that the PI Network is Microsoft's main focus.
The report reviews the development of AI in 2023 and points out that crowdsourcing is only one of the very small aspects.
Therefore, when discussing it in the community, we should be clear about the ins and outs of this incident and look rationally at its actual impact on the Pi Network project.
The PI core team sees Microsoft's ability to cite Dr. Nicolas as an affirmation, which boosts the project's reputation and demonstrates Dr. Nicolas' capabilities.
However, this does not mean that our PI project itself is particularly strong, but rather that it is a recognition from the point of view of our passion and Dr. Nicolas' contribution.
In fact, our community should pay more attention to the PI Network project that is currently underway, and not pay too much attention to aspects such as crowdsourcing or spam handling that are not related to the project.
The point made by Dr. Nicolas in 2013 is not directly related to our PI project, although our project may use similar technology.
As for the relationship between Microsoft and the Pi Network, we need to be clear: Microsoft's citation of Dr. Nicolas does not directly indicate that there is a close relationship between Microsoft and Pi.
Therefore, the pioneers of the sect in the community should be aware of this and not over-interpret or exaggerate the impact of this event.
Summary
The citation of Dr. Nicolas in Microsoft's work report is an acknowledgment of his contributions, but it does not directly address the PI Network project.
We should remain rational, pay attention to the actual progress of the project, and make full use of Dr. Nicolas' theories and techniques to advance the development of the PI Network. **10,000 Fans Incentive Plan