On the morning of 3 March, representatives of the two sides of the strait held the 15th meeting in the Kinmen area, which lasted 75 minutes, but in the end they could not reach an agreement, but the two sides reached a preliminary consensus on the issue of compensation. The meeting focused on the brutality of Taiwan's coast guard vessels, which led to the deaths of two mainland fishermen.
The focus of the dispute between the parties is not the amount of compensation, but the nature of the compensation. The mainland side believes that it should be called compensation, which means that the Taiwan Strait Patrol Department is at fault and must pay for the fault. The Taiwan authorities, on the other hand, tend to call it a consolation payment, emphasizing the significance of humanitarian comfort and condolences, which is more of an act of charity.
Although the two sides have reached a preliminary consensus, on the issue of compensation, there is a focus of controversy - the dispute over the title of compensation and consolation. This is not only a contest about money numbers, but also a profound understanding of responsibility**. The term compensation seems to imply the fault of the Taiwan Strait Guard in this incident, and it requires the at-fault party to bear financial compensation to repair the damage caused by negligence. The consolation money, on the other hand, carries a sense of appeasement, which seems to imply that the Taiwan Strait Patrol Department is not at fault. As a result, disagreements have arisen between the parties over the title of the compensation payment, which is not uncommon in issues involving the perception of liability. In addition to the issue of compensation, the mainland side also put forward three demands, aimed at pursuing more justice and truth. First of all, they demanded that the truth of the incident be made public, so that the public could see the "law enforcement" actions of the Taiwan Strait Patrol at the time of the incident** and understand the ins and outs of the incident. However, the authorities appeared to be weak in the matter and were slow to make the scene public, which made the public question their sincerity. Secondly, the mainland side demanded that the authorities formally apologize, take responsibility for this vicious incident, and assure the public that similar incidents will not occur in the future. This is not only a respect for the victims, but also a response to a sense of public justice. Finally, the mainland demanded that the coast guard personnel at that time be held accountable, that is, they should be sentenced or removed from their posts. This requirement is intended to uphold the dignity and impartiality of the law, and to show the public that wrongdoing is dealt with seriously. These three requirements, under the banner of justice and fairness, seek solutions to problems, and aim to maintain harmony and stability. We hope that the two sides can put aside their differences, treat each other with sincerity, and jointly contribute to the peaceful development of the country. 
At the delicate moment of handling this incident, the Taiwan authorities unexpectedly threw out a shocking piece of news: There were US special forces units "training" in the Kinmen area. This news was like a bombshell, instantly casting huge ripples on the surface of the lake. It has been revealed that the US "Green Berets" 1st Special Operations Group will be "permanently stationed" in Kinmen and Penghu, and its intention is obvious, and it is aimed at training the Taiwan military for the Taiwan authorities and strengthening its military presence in the region. The motive behind the news that the Taiwan authorities have chosen to do so at this time is undoubtedly complicated. Against the backdrop of the mainland's coast guard carrying out regular patrols in the Xiamen-Jin waters, Kinmen Island seems to have become a "turtle in an urn," and the Taiwan authorities are trying to use the presence of US special forces to form a deterrent to the mainland in order to dissuade it from making a possible landing on the island. This strategy seems to imply that the Taiwan authorities are nervous about the current military confrontation situation and have no choice but to seek the support of external forces to strengthen their own confidence. Qiu Yi, a well-known commentator, made an in-depth analysis of this matter, and pointed out that the appearance of US special forces in Taiwan has, to a certain extent, met the necessary conditions for the mainland to reunify Taiwan with military action. Although this statement is somewhat exaggerated to a certain extent, from the point of view of the mainland's "** ambitions, this news undoubtedly provides a powerful excuse for the mainland. For many years, the mainland has been actively preparing for the reunification of the country at the best time and in the right way. The US media also paid attention to this matter and revealed that the mainland has taken new measures in cracking down on "**". It has been learned that the mainland has used advanced equipment such as the "Zhuhai Yun" maritime drone carrier to carry out an all-round secret circumtour of Taiwan Island, collect key intelligence, and survey and map Taiwan's sea literature. These actions not only demonstrated the mainland's strong strength in the field of science and technology and military affairs, but also provided strong intelligence support for its future unified operations. Behind this series of events, it is not difficult to see the complexity and sensitivity of ***. The appearance of US special forces in Taiwan has undoubtedly added more uncertainties and variables to ***. However, no matter how the situation changes, the mainland's determination to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity is unwavering. The mainland will resolutely fight back against any external forces that attempt to interfere in China's internal affairs. Hotspot Engine Program
Therefore, the Kinmen Coast Patrol incident not only caused the first country to fall into tension again, but also triggered the intervention of international factors. How to properly handle this incident and maintain stability is a problem that needs to be solved urgently. The two sides should seek a just and equitable solution through dialogue and consultation, prevent the incident from escalating into a larger-scale conflict, and create favorable conditions for cross-strait peace and stability.