The situation on the battlefield in Ukraine is becoming more and more tense, Kim Jong-un officially signed the secret agreement between Russia and North Korea, 6,700 North Korean containers were shipped to Russia by rail, and Ukrainian parliamentarians urgently expressed their loyalty to the United States, declaring that they are ready to go to war against North Korea at any time. So can North Korea's military aid completely change the course of the Russia-Ukraine conflict? How will the United States and Western countries counter North Korea's involvement?
After successfully winning the battle of Avdiivka, the Russian army took advantage of the situation to advance the front in the direction of the east bank of the Dnieper River, and this advance plan attracted great attention from the United States and NATO. Under the situation of the Russian army pressing step by step, the new commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, Syrsky, can only order the Ukrainian troops evacuated from Avdiivka and the other main forces of the Ukrainian army to meet and re-establish new fortifications on the Eastern Front to resist the attack of the Russian army. However, before the Ukrainian army's defense line was completely formed, a bad news came that the already low morale of the Ukrainian army completely fell to the bottom. Recently, South Korean Defense Minister Shin Won-hyun said that military factories in North Korea are currently operating "at full capacity" to produce ** and artillery shells for Russia. Since August last year, North Korea has sent 6,700 containers to Russia by rail, which can hold about 3 million rounds of 152-millimeter artillery shells or 500,000 rounds of 122-millimeter multiple rocket launchers. In exchange for these ** equipment, Russia will provide the necessary food and other technical support for the DPRK.
However, for Shen Yuanxiang's statement, the United States soon put forward a different point of view, because according to the United States, in the past six months, the number of containers transported by North Korea to Russia should have exceeded 10,000, and a large number of shells and missiles from North Korea are being continuously transported to the front line, supporting the high-intensity fighting of the Russian army. Therefore, in the eyes of the United States, the intelligence information held by Shen Yuanxiang is still a little too "backward and conservative", and the amount of equipment that Russia has obtained from North Korea should be "incalculable". The reason why the United States and the United States will give different data reports from the South Korean side is very simple: because the United States needs more exaggerated data and information to intensify the tension of this military conflict that should not have happened, and only then can the United States complete its ulterior plan. Although it is still unclear to what extent the data released by the United States is exaggerated, it is undeniable that the military cooperation between Russia and the DPRK is gradually deepening and strengthening.
The two sides have been working closely since North Korea's supreme leader, Kim Jong-un, visited Russia last November. At that time, news came out that Russia used advanced military technology and some scarce resources of the DPRK for the exchange of ** equipment. In addition, Putin has also received an invitation from Kim Jong-un to visit Pyongyang and plans to visit Pyongyang at some point this year. As for the secret cooperation agreement between Russia and North Korea, it is widely believed that North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui formally signed it with Putin on behalf of Kim Jong-un during her visit to Russia, indicating that North Korea will fully support Russia's special military operation in Ukraine. Only then will Ukraine's disadvantage on the battlefield continue to expand, and it seems that it is only a matter of time before the entire conflict is lost. Some analysts have pointed out that today's Ukrainian army is facing challenges from multiple factors, including its own reserve combat strength and NATO's military assistance. After several successive war mobilizations, there are fewer and fewer available soldiers in Ukraine, and a large number of old people and young people have been drafted into the army. At the same time, U.S. Zelensky began to call on the West for more aid and support to avoid the emergence of a second battle for Avdiivka.
It should be noted that Zelensky also deliberately called Biden in a threatening tone this time, emphasizing that if the United States does not provide $60 billion in military aid to Ukraine, then millions of Ukrainian people will be killed. The United States and other Western countries have also heard Zelensky's appeal, but it is a pipe dream to expect them to provide military assistance according to Ukraine's request. First of all, how much of the military aid provided by the West to Ukraine is used on the battlefield, no one knows. Secondly, the rate of ammunition consumption in Ukraine exceeds the estimated level of the United States, and the ammunition produced by the American factory is completely unable to meet the front-line consumption of the Ukrainian army, and even has to directly transfer the inventory of the US military to replenish it. In the end, if there are no unexpected circumstances in this military conflict, Ukraine will lose, and if it continues to provide military assistance, it will be equivalent to taking money to waste it, and the United States and other Western countries will certainly not do this kind of thing. But in the eyes of some Ukrainian parliamentarians, the theory of turning defeat into victory still exists, and there is still hope for Ukraine to regain it, and in this context, various strange ideas have emerged.
A few days ago, a Ukrainian parliamentarian named Alexei Goncharenko shouted to Biden**, declaring that as long as the United States gives an order, Ukraine can send troops to war against North Korea and other countries at any time. For his bizarre remarks, Russia ** gave an explanation, frankly saying that his purpose in doing this is to show the United States the value of Ukraine's use and ensure that the United States will not give up Ukraine at a critical moment. But now, the United States is in full swing, and no one knows whether Alexei's remarks can stimulate the nerves of those right-wing forces in the United States. But it is clear to the outside world that if Zelensky insists on continuing to fight, then not only will Ukraine lose its future, but the whole of Ukraine will lose tomorrow, and I am afraid that no one in Kyiv will be able to escape the title of historical sinner.