Between the rise and fall of the Qing Dynasty, there was a system that attracted much attention, and the Yongzheng Emperor implemented the system of "raising honest silver" was the epitome of clean government. However, what are the ups and downs of its history?We will go into the history of the Qing Dynasty and analyze this glorious but gradually declining statecraft.
In the long history, the Qing Dynasty arose from the Mongols, and inherited many systems of the Ming Dynasty at the beginning of its establishment. Among them, the birth of the "incorruptible silver" system can be described as a response to the corruption problem of the Qing Dynasty.
During the reign of Emperor Yongzheng, the Qing Dynasty was politically stable, but the problem of corruption was still severe. In this context, Yongzheng advocated the system of "raising honest silver", aiming to induce honesty with high salaries and correct the atmosphere of official governance in the imperial court. However, why is it so difficult for this system to be sustained in the end?
In the early days of the Qing Dynasty, the income was very small, but there were still people who relied on military exploits, plunder, and other means to obtain wealth. The power struggle is serious, and various interest groups need to spend a lot of money to maintain their power, and in order to meet their daily expenses, they take the opportunity to accumulate wealth.
During the Kangxi period, the court was peaceful on the surface, but there were many ** exploits of the people in secret, and even ** resources. The superiors oppressed the subordinates, forming a shady scene, making the people miserable.
Emperor Yongzheng launched the policy of "returning fire consumption to the public", uniformly collecting taxes, and putting an end to the establishment of the first-class system of maintaining clean silver, the highest salary was greatly increased, and the atmosphere of honesty was restored.
However, although this system performed well in the early days, it did not fundamentally solve the problem of corruption, and there are still some places where ** is secretly derelict in their duties, which is regrettable.
With the advent of the Qianlong era, there was a major change in the system of raising honest silver. The imperial court reviewed the system, and it was not easy to adjust the fixed number, which seemed to be standardized, but in fact became the fuse for the system to go to a dead end.
With the development of social economy, the Qing Dynasty had serious inflation, and ** income was out of touch with the economy. In this case, the bad rules are reinstated in order to fill the economic shortfall.
The restrictions of the incorruptible silver system led to a sharp decrease in the income of the Qing Dynasty, and the practice prevailed again. Even if the successor emperor tried to rectify it, it was shelved because there were too many interests involved. With the change of dynasties, the financial problems have become increasingly serious, and the ** Yulu has been deducted, and the bad rules have reappeared.
To sum up, although the system of maintaining incorruptible silver in the Yongzheng period was a period of clean government, it declined in the Qianlong era. Whether the system is good or not is closely related to the rulers, and the success or failure lies in the continuation and change of the way of governing the country.
The Qing Dynasty's system of maintaining incorruptible silver: the interweaving of historical glory and decay, this period of history carries the exploration and challenges of governing the country. This historical document elaborates on the rise, development and eventual decline of the Qing Dynasty's incorruptible silver system, and the governance model and operation mode it reveals are worthy of our deep thought.
The system of maintaining honest silver emerged in the Yongzheng period, trying to promote honest and honest politics through high salaries. This kind of system design highlights the good intentions of the rulers and provides an attempt to restore a clean and honest government. However, despite the initial results of the Yongzheng period, its institutional restrictions and failure to comprehensively solve the essence of local problems have become the fuse of the system's decay.
During the Qianlong period, the system of maintaining incorruptible silver was adjusted and fixed figures were set, but it failed to meet the needs of the changes of the times and economic development. With inflation, **income is disconnected from the real economy, and **bad rules have reappeared. This change shows the dilemma of institutional rigidity and the disconnection between the development of the times, and also exposes the hesitation of those who govern to change.
The decline of the Qing Dynasty's system of maintaining incorruptible silver tells us that a single system design is not a panacea when it comes to governing the country. The system should be able to flexibly adjust with the changes of the times and keep pace with the times. Rulers need to constantly review, revise and improve the system to meet the needs of social development and avoid institutional rigidity and failure.
In addition, history also reminds us that governing society is not the work of one person, but requires the joint efforts of the whole society. It is difficult to completely solve the problem by the implementation of the system alone, and it is also necessary to cultivate morality and ethics and change the values of the whole society. In the construction of a clean government, in addition to institutional guarantees, it is also necessary to start from education, culture and other aspects to cultivate the people's sense of integrity and moral quality.
In general, the rise and fall of the Qing Dynasty's incorruptible silver system has left us with valuable historical enlightenment. In today's society, we should fully draw lessons from history, build a clean politics in a more flexible and intelligent way, and achieve the goal of long-term peace and stability of the country.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!