Zhang Xuefeng suddenly became silent, and he chose to express his attitude through a ***. **, he covered his mouth, and the T-shirt read "I was wrong, I apologize". This is his response to the controversy caused by a sentence he said in the live broadcast room a few days ago, a remark that made him the focus of hot searches again: "All liberal arts are called service industries, and they can be summed up as 'licking'". This time, Zhang Xuefeng seemed quite remorseful, and he chose self-criticism and apology to ease the public's dissatisfaction with him. However, that didn't stop him from being on the hot search list again, and this is the second time this has happened in just a few months. The previous time, he once said that "those who choose news should be stunned", which also caused a lot of controversy, and people can't help but ask, why is Zhang Xuefeng always scolded?
This time, in response to his remarks, some netizens refuted them one after another, citing many reasons, claiming that "liberal arts are also very valuable, and they are the embodiment of social civilization and progress", "What's wrong with the service industry?".The service is not inferior either" and so on. The focus of the controversy is no longer Zhang Xuefeng's specific remarks, but the social perception of the liberal arts and service industries. In this controversy, Zhang Xuefeng also fell into the whirlpool of **. Although he issued an apology statement, it was not able to completely calm the pressure of **. Some netizens felt that his actions were inappropriate and even had a negative impact on his personal image. His boyfriend, Lee Young-ho, also expressed concern about him in public, calling on him to work hard to restore a positive image.
Behind the whole incident is also Zhang Xuefeng's prejudice against mainland culture. Although he claims to be Chinese, his words and actions reveal a bias against mainland culture and a strong promotion of Japanese culture, which makes his identity controversial. This has also become a focus of controversy, making people begin to think deeply about the sensitivity of his variety shows, reminding stars in the entertainment industry to be more cautious in their words and deeds. However, the core issue of the controversy is not just Zhang Xuefeng's personal remarks, but the society's perception of the liberal arts and service industry and the power of the Internet. During the incident, netizens not only found out the identity of the store owner through collective action, but also exposed his bad behavior. This demonstrates the tremendous power of the Internet in terms of social supervision, as well as the effect of guidance.
As the incident unfolds, the owner's two stores face a possible closure, which is another reminder that everyone's actions can be subject to internet scrutiny, and when it comes to misconduct, the consequences can be dire. In the age of information, everyone should use the Internet wisely to arouse positive energy in society, rather than becoming the perpetrator of negative events. Returning to Zhang Xuefeng's incident, he chose self-reflection and apology in the controversy, but this did not exempt him from criticism from **. It also makes us think about how tolerant society is of individual words and deeds, and the impact of speech on personal image in the Internet age. Perhaps, what really needs to be discussed is not the liberal arts, the service industry, or Zhang Xuefeng himself, but how we can look at speech more rationally in this information age, and how to build a more tolerant and inclusive social atmosphere.
In Zhang Xuefeng's affairs, the complexity of ** is further revealed. He chose to respond to the controversy with a "I was wrong, I apologize", however, this did not end the controversy, but became the focus of a new round of heated discussions. Netizens continued to refute his remarks, listing the value of liberal arts and the importance of the service industry, and calling for respect for these areas. The essence of controversy is no longer a specific statement, but a collision of social ideas and cognitions. Zhang Xuefeng's behavior triggered a series of reflections. He has made a name for himself in the field of educational consulting, delivering educational ideas through live streaming with parents and students. However, his words and deeds have become the focus of public attention. He called on everyone to look at his remarks rationally, believing that what he provided was only a reference for the advisory body, and that the real decision-making power rested with the individual. This also reflects that on this issue, it is not only the liberal arts and service industries that should be discussed, but also the rational processing of information by society and the autonomy of individuals in decision-making.
The evolution of the whole incident has also made us more aware of the social impact of the Internet age. Although Zhang Xuefeng has been severely criticized, he also has certain supporters on the Internet. His remarks on Weibo about the people of Henan received 170,000 likes, which seemed to form a special counterattack. This also makes us reflect on how the diffusion of information on the Internet and the group effect affect the direction of ** in the event of controversy. Within a day, netizens quickly found the identity of the store owner and exposed his misconduct through social **. This demonstrates the power of group action in the Internet age and the collective oversight of unethical behavior in the online society. The two stores of the store owner have tens of thousands of negative reviews in a short period of time, and the comment area is full of voices of dissatisfaction with them, which also shows us the firm attitude of consumers to protect their rights. This incident is not only a dispute between individuals and businesses, but also a common concern of society for morality and justice.
In the Internet era, the speed of information dissemination and the intensity of social supervision have made everyone more cautious in public. The storm caused by this incident is a powerful restraint on the bad behavior of merchants, and it also reminds the whole society that it is everyone's responsibility to maintain justice and defend the bottom line of morality. Under the supervision of the Internet, businesses and individuals must always maintain a sense of reverence for public behavior to avoid falling into the maelstrom of morality and law. This also provides a powerful case and enlightenment for the continuous improvement of the social supervision mechanism in the Internet era. Returning to Zhang Xuefeng's incident, he chose self-reflection and apology in the controversy, but this did not exempt him from criticism from **. It also makes us think about society's tolerance for individual words and actions, and the impact of speech on personal image in the Internet age. Perhaps, what really needs to be discussed is not the liberal arts, the service industry, or Zhang Xuefeng himself, but how we can look at speech more rationally in this information age, and how to build a more tolerant and inclusive social atmosphere. In the information age, we not only need more knowledge, but also better thinking and discernment, so as to face diverse views and opinions with a healthy and peaceful attitude.