There is nothing harder than changing a person's stubbornness. Even elementary school students know whether the earth is a ball or not, and most people stubbornly believe that the earth is not a ball, but a pizza.
* Doctrine of the Flat: The legend of the flat earth.
This is the legendary "horizon" doctrine, which believes that the place where we live is actually a flat surface, and the sky is like a greenhouse, which has a striking resemblance to our ancient people's view of "the sky is round and the place is round". Even though mankind has come up with a lot of evidence to prove the shape of the earth, there are still many supporters of the "horizontal" theory. At present, there is also a "Flat Theory Association" abroad, which regularly holds activities every year to invite members to gather together and enjoy their moments.
Irving's confusion: NBA stars support the Horizon doctrine.
Even NBA star Irving has publicly expressed his support for the doctrine of Horizon. So much so that many of Owen's fans have turned to support the Horizon Theory. It is hard to believe that the proponents of the doctrine of the earth are mainly concentrated in Europe and the United States, where the economy and technology are more developed, and the popularity of basic knowledge is not even comparable to that of Asia.
These people only believe in what they can see and touch with their eyes, because everything they see is flat, and of course the earth is flat. As for the ** taken by the International Space Station, because they haven't seen it with their own eyes, they don't believe it. The theory of the horizon firmly believes that the earth we live in is a piece of pizza floating in space, it is a flat continent, and once it reaches the edge of the continent, it will fall into space!And the shape of the earth claimed by scientists is an illusion!
Science Showdown: Unraveling the Truth About the Shape of the Earth.
For us who have been baptized by modern science, we don't even have the desire to refute this group of people, and we just have the pity of looking at children. If the Earth is really flat, why would scientists lie to people that the Earth is a sphere and what good is it for them?
The psychology behind the doctrine of the horizon: believing that seeing is believing.
Proponents of the Horizon Theory trust their own intuition and feelings, they see what they see as true, and they do not easily believe in abstract scientific theories. This phenomenon is especially pronounced among Irving's fans, who have formed a blind support for the doctrine of the Terra under the rhetoric of their idols.
The scientific community fights back: lifting the veil on the truth about the planet.
Scientists use a large amount of empirical data and ** to try to dispel the myth of the Horizon Theory. Through modern technological means such as satellite images and space probes, they have shown the world the true face of the earth. This contrast makes us deeply appreciate the power of science and the fragility of the doctrine of the horizon.
The Inheritance of the Doctrine of the Flat: Association Activities and Ideological Collisions.
How can foreign "Horizon Theory Associations" survive in today's highly technologically advanced society?The annual association event is a fascinating topic. People participated in the discussions, and the members of the association came together to talk about their deep belief in the doctrine of the Flatlands. The existence of this community is a reflection on our understanding of the popularization of science.
Conclusion: The mystery of the earth is still not fully revealed.
In the face of stubborn belief in the doctrine of the Level, perhaps we should keep an open mind and respect different points of view. However, with the support of science and evidence, we cannot give up on the pursuit of truth. The debate over the shape of the Earth may never end, but it's the debate that drives science forward and gives us a deeper understanding of the blue planet.
This article delved into the controversial topic of the Doctrine of the Horizons, and the support for it by public figures such as Owen, which caused me to think deeply. Through vivid descriptions and discussions, the author shows the phenomenon that still exists in modern society and the counterattack of the scientific community. Here are some of my comments and thoughts on this article.
First of all, the article succeeds in attracting the reader's interest by introducing the doctrine of "horizons", which introduces the reader to a rather quirky and interesting topic. This engaging approach makes the whole article interesting and makes people want to delve into this seemingly ridiculous idea.
Second, the article presents an interesting social phenomenon by portraying the support of public figures such as Owen for the doctrine of the horizon. This not only adds to the interest of the article, but also reflects the questioning of traditional scientific views and the acceptance of non-traditional views by some people. Owen's support added to the doctrine of the horizon, allowing it to spread more among certain communities.
However, the article does not simply dismiss this phenomenon as a joke, but rather emphasizes the importance of scientific evidence through the scientific community's counterattack. This objective and rational attitude is one of the highlights of the article, allowing readers to feel the adherence to scientific truth even in laughter. Scientists have used satellite imagery, space probes and other means to show the world the true face of the earth, emphasizing the unique role of science in revealing the truth.
In addition, the article also reflects on the current situation of science popularization in society. The existence and activities of the Association for the Doctrine of the Horizon have given rise to reflection on the extent to which science has been popularized and reminded us that there is still work to be done in terms of information dissemination and education. This topic is not only a dialectical of the doctrine of the earth, but also a reflection on society's perception of science.
Overall, this article not only introduces the ancient and novel idea of the horizon theory from a funny and interesting angle, but also leads readers to think about the relationship between science and faith through an in-depth analysis of scientific evidence and social phenomena. In the real society, respect for different points of view and the respect for scientific rationality are attitudes that we need to maintain at all times.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!