The slogan of rejuvenating the country through science and education was forgotten so quickly?
College students have graduated more than 10 million, but such a good thing has been said to be a burden? What kind of fairy logic is this? Is halving the number of university students a success in education? Don't put the cart before the horse, friends.
The job market is a supply and demand market, and it is indeed a practical problem for college students to be unemployed, but the fundamental reason for this dilemma is not that there are more college students, but that there are fewer suitable enterprise jobs! There are fewer suitable corporate positions! There are fewer suitable corporate positions!
The young population will not disappear out of thin air, and if there are 5 million fewer college students today, there will be 5 million more high school students and technical secondary school students. Do you think this is progress? Or is it a step backwards?
The question we should really reflect on and solve is not why so many college students are trained, but why we don't have enough excellent companies to accommodate them! Just imagine, if there are more competitive companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, and BYD, college students will still be worried about finding jobs? Think about it a little more boldly, if we can give birth to a few innovation-driven international enterprises like Apple, Microsoft, Disney, wouldn't all graduate and doctoral students go to the internal examination?
Therefore, why is the development speed of our enterprise unsatisfactory and why is the industry upgraded.
First: Real estate, the vampire of social wealth, sucks a lot of blood and eventually disappears.
High rents drain cash flow and force companies to pursue short-term profits, creating a business environment where peers are starving to death and making a fortune. High housing prices have also sucked away the creative vitality of young people, and everyone is under a lot of pressureTrembling, extremely poor ability to resist risks, without any opportunity for trial and error, just to repay the mortgage safely. As a result, the top talents study and run, and the intermediate talents have involuted the examination and editing, and the survival pressure of the low-level social animals is huge, and 996 is still precarious, and they can't understand and dare not have babies.
More critically, real estate has sucked a lot of blood, but has not promoted industrial upgrading. What technological innovations can be made in the construction industry? Can you build a house and sell it in a beautiful country? If you don't innovate yourself, it's better to become a chaebol to invest in the field of innovation! Unfortunately, it didn't. Tencent Ali can often be seen in the venture capital circle, but real estate giants are rarely seen. Recently, there have even been thunderstorms in the real estate circle. Say, they have no money. Fantasy is not fantasy, the money they make, it's like disappearing out of thin air. Of course, money can't disappear out of thin air, do you think the money went**? Can't say.
Second:If you turn a blind eye to your own monopoly, you will be punished even if the monopoly of others is far away.
First of all, let's take a stand, vicious monopolies must be cracked down. However, other people's monopoly at least the market is open, the jobs are fair competition, and ordinary people can still get a little profit through their own efforts. On the other hand, the supply monopoly of a certain computer brand and the employment monopoly of the four golden flowers of the railway guard forest are really beyond the reach of ordinary people. Second, the purpose and original intention of anti-monopoly should be to maintain the healthy development of the industry. Where did the money go? What balance and contribution has been made to the industry? I don't know, and no one cares, everyone may be a transaction protection fee. This year, the Internet giants have stopped their past expansion, began to lay off employees one after another, and foreign capital has withdrawn little by little, is this the healthy development of the industry?
Third:Although innovation is good, Moutai is better
With the old monopoly, some enterprises live a stable and comfortable life, where is the motivation to innovate, where is the talent to innovate? Without an open market, there will be no soil for innovation, and there will be no place for high-level talents. When society as a whole is caught in an atmosphere of low innovation, bureaucracy becomes justice. Those who are proficient in cliques, flattery, and drinking table culture have a stage to show their talents, which means that those who are addicted to academics and devote themselves to scientific research are not welcomed. This top-down ethos stifles innovation and fuels it. A vicious circle is formed.
Conclusion: Do we have many academic talents? How many Nobel Prizes has China won, so that experts have this illusion?
More and less are always relative, but objectively speaking, our academic talents are not many, but far from enough, and what is more scarce is the excellent enterprise that can accommodate talents! The top priority at the moment is to improve our business environment, open up the market for fair competition, relax cultural censorship, support innovative enterprises, and give a broad space for talent. The market should be bigger and bigger, who wants to be smaller and smaller? If the industrial upgrading fails, the talent will be downgraded? What kind of reasoning is this?
Finally, I hope that one day, the students who have studied abroad will be able to return with peace of mind, so that they can still realize their academic ambitions and family happiness while living in China. It's not that you either run, or you face the helplessness of joining if you can't beat it.