From August 15 to October 31, 1989, in just 78 days, more than 46,000 *** people across the country surrendered!This historic moment demonstrates the determination of the CCP to resolutely fight corruption. From the Fourth Plenary Session of the 13th CPC Central Committee to the "Circular" issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, how can a series of measures in the anti-corruption struggle cleverly produce a huge deterrent effect on a national scale?In this article, we'll take a closer look at this fascinating history.
From June 23 to 24, 1989, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 13th CPC Central Committee was held in Beijing, officially establishing the building of a clean and honest government and the fight against corruption as major events related to the life and death of the Party and the country. At the plenary meeting of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China, a decision was adopted to punish corruption as one of the seven things to be done well in the near future. At this time, it is emphasized that criminal acts such as speculation and speculation will be strictly investigated and punished, and all will be punished in accordance with the law.
With the enthusiastic support of cadres and the masses across the country, the anti-corruption decision of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate adopted the "Circular" issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate. The bulletin set the deadline for voluntary surrender and confession from August 15 to October 31, a total of 78 days. During this period, state functionaries, managers of enterprises and public institutions, and so forth, may be given lenient punishments as long as they surrender themselves and confess the facts of the crime within the prescribed time limit.
After the issuance of the Circular, a strong legal deterrent effect was quickly generated across the country. ** Corrupt elements can't sleep at night and can't stay in fear all day long, and the reports of the masses have also increased significantly, setting off a wave of anti-corruption. Against this background, many criminals chose to surrender themselves after ideological struggle, such as Yan Moumou, deputy manager of the Xixia County Food Company in Henan Province.
Yan Moumou was the first person in the country to turn himself in, and he was saved from prosecution because he voluntarily confessed. After receiving the anonymous report, the local prosecutor's office immediately launched an investigation. Although Yan tried to clear his name, after hearing the broadcast of the "Notice", he completely collapsed and confessed his *** crime. This case has become a bright spot in the anti-corruption wave.
The issuance of the circular sparked a wave of voluntary surrenders across the country. Zhou, director of the transportation bureau of a county in Jilin Province, came to the office of the secretary of the county party committee to turn himself in the day after the "Circular" was issued. Zhou, who was full of smiles in the past, had a heavy face this time, and he stopped talking in the office of the secretary of the county party committee, and finally mustered up the courage to confess his ** facts. With the encouragement of the county party secretary, Zhou was exempted from prosecution, which was an exciting scene and a microcosm of the national wave of surrender.
Shi is the manager of Huanmei Decoration Company, a subsidiary of Beijing Agricultural Construction Corporation, and the first person in the country to voluntarily surrender. He was anxious after hearing the "Notice", and finally, with the encouragement of his family, wrote a material to explain the crime, took out the stolen money and surrendered accompanied by his wife. Chen, from the Shanghai office of a certain unit in Zhejiang, also rushed to the city procuratorate overnight after the "Circular" was issued, and turned himself in, thus kicking off the anti-corruption wave in Shanghai.
In accordance with the provisions of the Circular, all those who surrendered within the time limit were given leniency. Statistics show that a total of 36,000 criminals and other criminals have surrendered to the procuratorial organs, and more than 10,000 people have taken the initiative to confess violations of law and discipline to administrative supervision organs at all levels. The combined number of these two figures has reached more than 46,000, which fully proves that the circulars issued by the two courts have achieved the expected good results.
The anti-corruption campaign in 1989, marked by the Circular issued by the People's Houses and the People's Procuratorate, set an example for the rule of law nationwide. The anti-corruption wave has swept across the country, so that those ** elements who were originally at large have to voluntarily surrender and accept legal sanctions. This history fully demonstrates the determination of the CPC to resolutely crack down on corruption and lays a solid foundation for the construction of the rule of law in the future.
The shock of 1989!How can the national anti-corruption wave be set off?The article profoundly analyzes the historic moment of China's anti-corruption struggle. This is an in-depth and insightful article that vividly illustrates the anti-corruption measures taken by China** in 1989 and the remarkable results achieved by these measures across the country through detailed descriptions and case studies.
First of all, the article introduces the background of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 13th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in 1989, highlighting the identification of the construction of party style and clean government and the fight against corruption as major decisions related to the life and death of the party and the country. This policy decision not only reflects the party's high degree of vigilance, but also expresses its serious attitude toward the building of a clean and honest government and the struggle against corruption. This determination has laid a solid foundation for the subsequent fight against corruption.
Second, the article describes in detail the ultimatum of the "Circular" issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate to corrupt elements across the country. The circular sets a deadline for voluntary surrender and promises leniency for those who turn themselves in within the prescribed period. The clever use of this rule of law has made the deterrent effect of the law have produced throughout the country, and corrupt elements cannot escape the punishment of the law.
In the article, through the vivid narration of the cases of Yan, Zhou, Shi, Chen, etc., the actual impact of the "Circular" is demonstrated. These cases are real and touching, which not only show the deep thinking and inner struggle of corrupt elements in the face of the rule of law, but also demonstrate the fairness and power of the rule of law. In particular, those who were brave enough to confess their crimes were given leniency under the rule of law, which set a positive example for Chinese society.
In addition, the article summarizes the spread of the anti-corruption wave across the country and the good effect of the circulars issued by the two courts across the country. 36,000 people surrendered, more than 10,000 people voluntarily confessed to violations of law and discipline, and the data of more than 46,000 people fully proved that the notices issued by the two courts have produced significant anti-corruption effects across the country. This provides valuable experience and reference for China's future rule of law construction.
Overall, this article not only vividly presents the historical picture of China's anti-corruption struggle in 1989, but also demonstrates the power and fairness of the rule of law through detailed case analysis. The structure of the article is clear, the expression is fluent, and it is an excellent review that deserves in-depth reading and reflection**.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!