Learn about the common law terminology Summary Judgment

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-30

Summary Judgment, also known as Summary Justice, translates to Summary Judgment;Summary judgment or summary trial. It is a unique civil procedure system in common law countries, which allows judges to directly make substantive and binding judgments on all or part of cases without going through a trial. Summary trials simplify litigation procedures, speed up the litigation process, and save litigation costs.

Although the summary judgment was handed down without going through a full trial process, this does not affect its legitimacy as a judgment rendered under ordinary procedures, and there is no doubt about its legitimacy. Therefore, once a summary judgment is rendered, it has exactly the same effect as an ordinary civil judgment.

Yuan Zhao Dictionary of Common Law:

Summary judgment refers to a way for the court to settle the case as soon as possible without trial when there is no genuine issue between the parties on the material facts in the case or the case only involves legal issues.

Black's Law Dictionary:

A summary judgment is a judgment on a claim for which there is no real dispute on a material fact and the applicant is entitled to a judgment on a question of law.

Rule 24 of the English Rules of Civil ProcedureArticle 1:

The court does not need to go through the trial procedure to adjudicate the claim or the specific issue of the issue. ”

a procedure by which the court may decide a claim or a particular issue without a trial. )

U.S. Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Court:

In cases where there is no dispute over important facts, the court shall render a judgment on the basis of the application of both parties and the original defendant, and make a judgment as a legal issue without the court's factual trial.

Refer to bilingual example sentences:

kobre & kim’s new york team obtains us $60 million+ summary judgment in new york state courts on behalf of mezzanine financing house gso re onshore llc against billionaire real estate developer tamir sapir over loan default relating to large new york development.

Kobre & Kim's New York team represented Gso Re OnshoreLLC, a mezzanine finance firm, in a lawsuit filed in New York State Court against billionaire real estate developer Tamir Sapir in connection with a loan default related to a major real estate development project in New York, resulting in summary judgment of more than $60 million.

the plaintiff may then h**e to apply to the court for summary judgment or even take the matter to trial, incurring much expense and suffering delay.

The plaintiff may then have to apply to the court for summary judgment or even have the matter heard in court, incurring significant expense and delay, as well as the defendant in attempting to evade liability for immediate payment.

summary judgment is not exist in our existing civil legislation, so all the case, whether **or complex, h**ing dispute or not, will be resolved after trial.

China's current civil procedure legislation does not provide for a summary judgment system, and all cases, no matter whether they are complicated or simple, or whether there are disputes, must go through a trial before a judgment can be made as long as they enter the litigation procedure.

Related Pages