The philosophy of a tree: how necessary it is to keep a low profile.
On the literary stage, Mo Yan is like a quiet tree, but it has attracted a storm. Once the pride of Chinese literature, Mo Yan attracted widespread attention for his film adaptation of "Red Sorghum", but now it is jointly opposed by 15 writers. Does all this mean that he really doesn't deserve it?
Firm attitude and clear position.
Before Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize in Literature, he was just an unknown writer. It wasn't until October 11, 2012 that his life changed completely. However, much is known about him in Zhang Yimou's "Red Sorghum", and little is known about his other works.
Literary giants were boycotted.
Recently, authoritative institutions such as the China Writers Association, "Guangming **" Literature and Art Newspaper and other institutions and central media have boycotted Mo Yan and excluded him from the list of century-old famous writers. This move is resolute and unequivocal, and directly rejects Mo Yan's writings and other works. This scene is embarrassing, what has Mo Yan experienced over the years?
Through understanding, many people believe that his works scandalize the nation and the country, and it is because of this that he was able to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. Some people may think that this is jealousy, but in fact, it is Westerners who judge Mo Yan, and they think that Mo Yan is a "betrayer", and his works are more in line with Western aesthetics and are deeply loved by Westerners.
Behind the literary controversy.
Red Sorghum is considered to be more of a subjective idea of Zhang Yimou, while Mo Yan has become a literary leader through his excellent works. However, the recent boycott has raised questions about what exactly he did. 15 writers co-signed **, rejected the awards given by the judges, and even singled out mistakes in the essay. These are just some of the reasons that prove Mo Yan is unworthy of the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Disagreement vs. support.
Many people lack understanding of Mo Yan's works, mainly through the Nobel Prize to attract attention. However, there are also writers such as Yu Hua who support Mo Yan. Yu Hua believes that if even Mo Yan does not deserve the Nobel Prize in Literature, then most of the writers who win the prize do not. This is analyzed from a literary point of view, proving Mo Yan's talent, claiming that the act of attacking him is just a sign of jealousy.
The Responsibility and Perspective of Literature.
The people who judge the works include the broad masses of the people and influential official media, and this is the most fair judgment. Mo Yan's works expose the so-called "darkness", and in his stories, he depicts the vulgarity of human nature and the ignorance of ordinary people. He won the Nobel Prize because he denied the history of the 30 years after 1949. He once said: "Literature and art are definitely not tools for singing praises. ”
The multifaceted nature of art.
Mo Yan's works have been criticized for being ugly, but he is still optimistic about life. His literary works, such as "The Transparent Carrot", deeply addressed the issue of family relationships and reconstituted families, which resonated with readers. Literature is multifaceted, good and bad, depending on each person's point of view.
A late-blooming life.
Last year, Mo Yan released the novella "The Late Bloomer", expressing his life memories of gradually accumulating courage in the process of growing up. This makes people re-examine his optimism and deep reflection.
Conclusion: The Power of Words.
Mo Yan used to be the pride of everyone's hearts, but now he has become the finger of thousands of people. This ironic fate is thought-provoking. In literature, everyone's views and standards are different, art is better than life, and the same is true for literature. Mo Yan's words may be controversial, but the final judgment is in everyone's heart. Whether he deserves the Nobel Prize in Literature or not is perhaps the most powerful answer given by time and history.
Thank you for reading, thinking about more exciting.
Mo Yan, a distinctive literary giant, whose works once led the trend of Chinese literature, is now caught in a storm. This essay provides a detailed analysis of Mo Yan's literary career, revealing both his brilliance and the controversies he faced.
At the beginning of the article, through the metaphor of "the tree attracts the wind", it vividly explains Mo Yan's experience as a "tree". The low-key philosophy of life is reflected in his writings, however, this low-key does not make him avoid the ** outlet. This makes people ponder whether in today's society, even people with outstanding literary achievements are difficult to escape from outside judgment.
When describing Mo Yan's literary achievements, the article not only mentions the classic "Red Sorghum", but also gives an interesting description of the dramatic changes in his life after winning the Nobel Prize for Literature. This turn of events makes one wonder whether it was literature that changed Mo Yan's life, or did his life change his literature?
Mo Yan's controversy centers on the depiction of nations and states in his works. The article puts forward two completely different views on this, one side believes that this is the reason why he won the Nobel Prize, and the other side believes that he is "flattering" and scandalizing the Chinese people. This divergence reflects both the diversity of literature and the different views of different people on social reality.
Mo Yan's works have also encountered a series of controversies in the process of being interpreted. Does "Red Sorghum" reflect more of Zhang Yimou's subjective wishes? Does Mo Yan's work satisfy Western aesthetic tastes while attacking history? These questions are undoubtedly thought-provoking, and they are also an important reference for evaluating the value of Mo Yan's literature.
In the article, the ** behavior of 15 writers jointly opposed is presented more objectively, and it also shows the support of Yu Hua and other writers. This was undoubtedly an encouragement for Mo Yan, and at the same time set off a greater controversy in the literary world. Whether these debates are based on real literary disagreements or envious and malicious attacks is a question worth pondering.
Finally, the article concludes with a "late-blooming life", revealing Mo Yan's personal attitude and philosophy of life. Mo Yan uses his works to express his deep thinking about life, and has a unique understanding of the late life. This may be one of the reasons why he has always been optimistic about life.
Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of Mo Yan and his works with profound observation and objectivity. Mo Yan's literary path, despite its twists and turns, is also full of unique charm. In this controversy, perhaps we should understand and respect the diversity of literature from different perspectives, as well as the personal views and values expressed by each writer in his creation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!