The reason for the delay in the ceasefire agreement within Israel is a matter of detail.
The ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel includes releases, a ceasefire and the entry of supplies into Gaza. Biden expressed his delight at the ceasefire agreement and spoke with Israeli prime ministers, Egypt** and the Emir of Qatar to discuss the details.
But Netanyahu and the Israeli military are at odds over the ceasefire, with the former wanting to show his domestic wisdom and the latter wanting to shirk responsibility. Recently, Israel and Hamas reached a ceasefire agreement aimed at ending tensions in the Gaza Strip.
However, the implementation of the ceasefire agreement has been internally delayed due to the details. Despite the agreement between Hamas and Israel on releases, a ceasefire and the entry of humanitarian supplies into Gaza, there are still divisions within Israel.
Biden expressed joy at the ceasefire and immediately spoke with the Israeli prime minister, Egypt** and the emir of Qatar to discuss the details of the ceasefire agreement. Through this agreement, Biden hopes to bring long-term stability to the Gaza Strip.
However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli military have different views on some of the details. With this ceasefire, Netanyahu hopes to show his wisdom in domestic affairs and establish an image as a leader at home.
The Israeli military, however, is more concerned with passing the buck and avoiding the problems and responsibilities that may arise in the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. This has led to controversy and vacillation within Israel over the details of the ceasefire agreement.
Prior to this conflict, Israel had been trying to eliminate Hamas completely by military means.
However, they have come to realize that the elimination of Hamas is impossible and will face unbearable consequences.
Therefore, the parties chose a ceasefire agreement as a solution. However, the implementation of this agreement has been hampered by disputes over the details.
In addition to the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the recent attempt by India to assassinate Pannon in the United States has also attracted the attention of the international community. The Indian side denied the accusation and listed the assassin as ***
The United States** showed seriousness about this incident and filed a lawsuit against India. The United States** believes that any country that attempts to carry out an assassination attempt on the territory of the United States should be severely punished.
However, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's attempt to negotiate a negotiated solution to the issue has been met with cynicism from the Indian side.
Trudeau is eager to resolve this dispute through dialogue and avoid further escalation of the conflict.
However, India has pushed back against Trudeau's negotiating moves and has made accusations against Canada. India responded to Trudeau's call with cynicism, continuing to stand its ground and denying and countering its actions.
Through the revelation of Israel's commitment to delay the ceasefire agreement and India's assassination operation, we can see the complex interests and political struggles in the international community. These incidents have also raised questions about the actions of the countries concerned.
At the same time, we can also see the dilemmas and challenges that Biden faces in dealing with these complex issues. To sum up, whether it is the delay of the ceasefire agreement within Israel or the assassination attempt by India, it shows the intricate interests and political struggles in the international community.