This article**gzh: vocational education sci
Today, I would like to share with you scholars and teachers the experience of higher vocational teachers in publishing SCI science and technology.
Author: Chen Lei, Henan Vocational College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
Published: Henan Education. Vocational Education (November 2018) (Editor-in-charge: Zhang Deguang).
How to write SCI technology for young teachers in higher vocational colleges**SCI is the abbreviation of Science Citation Index, which is a citation database founded and published by the Institute of Scientific Information in the United States in 1961. SCI and EI (Engineering Index) and ISTP (Index of Proceedings of Scientific and Technological Conferences) constitute the world's three famous scientific and technological literature retrieval systems, which are internationally recognized as the main retrieval tools for scientific statistics and scientific evaluation, among which SCI is the most important and has the highest level. The vast majority of SCI journals only accept studies written in English**. For most undergraduate colleges, the quantity and quality of published SCIs have long become one of the important criteria for evaluating a teacher's scientific research level.
So do teachers in higher vocational colleges also need to publish sci**?The author believes that teachers in higher vocational colleges, especially young teachers, also need to do scientific research and actively publish SCI**. This is because scientific research achievements are the inevitable needs of higher vocational colleges to leap over to applied technology undergraduate colleges, the inevitable needs of teachers of higher vocational colleges to deepen their professional knowledge, and the inevitable needs of graduates of higher vocational colleges to learn and develop at a higher level. So, how do you write an excellent sci** that is recognized by peers and experts?Based on my own engineering background, scientific research experience and review experience, the author judges whether the writing of a SCI technology is professional and excellent from the several components of SCI technology.
1. Whether the title and abstract of ** are simple and clear
* The title must be concise and clearly tell the reviewer or reader what the focus of the research is. **The abstract is generally written from three aspects: the starting point of the study, the research methodology, and the main research results. A good abstract should make it very clear to the reader what was studied, how it was studied, and what important conclusions were reached after reading it. For a researcher with more experience in a certain research field, when he reads sci, he often understands the basic content of this article by reading the title and abstract of the article. Unless it is necessary to understand and draw on what he is talking about, he generally does not read the rest of the text. Therefore, an eye-catching topic and a concise but informative abstract are the main plus points for an article.
2. Whether the introduction of ** is a good review of the literature in the same field, and whether the importance of the content of this research is educed on this basis.
As the first part of the main body, the writing of the introduction is generally divided into the following items: the importance and value of a certain research field, the research results and main conclusions obtained by previous researchers, the deficiencies or areas that need to be improved in previous research, the content of the research plan and the importance of the research. At the beginning of the introduction, it is necessary to explain to the reader the importance of a certain field of research, that is, to clarify the background of the specific research work. In addition, when summarizing the research results obtained by predecessors, it is necessary to avoid a simple record in the form of a running account, but should be a high-level summary of the research results of predecessors. For the sake of clarity, the research results of previous researchers can be classified and summarized. In the summary and summary texts, it is possible to compare the results of different people's research, or to compare the data obtained so far with the ideal data that can be achieved in theory. Find deficiencies or defects through comparison, and then lead to a specific problem that this company wants to solve or study in depth, that is, the research purpose of the company. In other words, the research purpose of ** must be based on the research progress of previous researchers in this field, and the research purpose is innovative. At the end of the introduction, the author may also briefly elaborate on the conclusions of this study and the value of these conclusions in relevant research areas. At this point, a complete introduction is written. In the process of writing an introduction, it is also necessary to pay attention to the high generalization of the English text, as well as the correctness of grammar.
3. Whether the results and discussion of ** have made a detailed analysis of the experimental data, and whether the research conclusions have been summarized on this basis.
In the results and discussion section of science and technology, the author needs to express every data and chart given in the article in as much detail as possible, and at this time it is necessary to use objective descriptive text. Taking the author's research direction of materials chemistry as an example, the author should tell the reader what the morphology and structure of the material are, what the chemical composition of the material is, and what the performance test data of the material is. Authors also need to compare their own data with relevant data from previous articles as much as possible when interpreting the data to the reader. For example, when interpreting the specific surface area of graphene prepared by graphite oxide heat treatment, it is best for the authors to compare the data with the previous test data after giving their own test data, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of graphene preparation methods through data comparison, or clarify the experimental factors affecting the specific surface area of graphene. After the interpretation of each ** and each chart, it is best to have one or two conclusive sentences at the end of each interpretation text, that is, what this ** and this chart illustrate. Such concluding texts generally do not require the presence of data, but merely illustrate a trend or phenomenon. Taking the author's elaboration of the relationship curve between the specific surface area of graphene and the heating rate of graphite oxide heat treatment as an example, after analyzing the experimental data in the curve, the author will add a conclusive sentence: "The curve shows that the specific surface area of graphene increases with the increase of the heating rate of graphite oxide heat treatment." ”
Fourth, whether the conclusion of ** is a good summary of the whole article, and whether it gives a clear research conclusion.
Authors should avoid writing the conclusion as an abstract when writing the conclusion section of **. There is no need to point out the importance of the research direction again, nor do you need to write the research process and methods again, but only to tell the reader the research conclusion concisely and clearly. The conclusion is a summary of the specific conclusions obtained in each unit and the most important and conspicuous conclusions extracted on this basis, so that readers can have a comprehensive and clear understanding of the research results by reading the conclusion part.
Therefore, the number of words in the conclusion is generally more than the number of words in the abstract, and the conclusion generally avoids being highly generalized, but needs to give some specific data or the trend of data changes. Sometimes, at the end of the conclusion, some plans and prospects for future research work can be added, so as to reflect the continuity of the author's research work and the author's good scientific research attitude of taking the initiative to conduct in-depth research.
5. Whether the references cited are representative and whether they are the latest research results.
References are generally located at the end of an article, and the number of references is generally not less than 30. The role of references is to provide arguments for the author's arguments, and the level of the journal in which the references are located indicates the level of the literature that the author usually consults. Therefore, it is generally recommended that authors use high-level references.
For example, when writing a research on the preparation and application of nanomaterials, it is best to cite articles from some journals that have considerable influence in the field of nanomaterials research, such as articles from well-known journals such as "Nano Letter", "Advanced Materials", "Carbon" and so on. It may be that the journal selected by the author is lower than the level of the journal where the reference is located, but the fact that the author cites more literature from high-level journals shows that the author has a relatively lofty academic vision. The references cited by the author must be works that have been selected, have been studied in a classic manner, and can really provide strong arguments for the author's arguments. Accurate and hierarchical references will make the reader realize that the author has indeed done a lot of research and thought when writing the manuscript, and this will undoubtedly add points to a submission.
This article**From Henan Education (Vocational Education), this article is only used for academic sharing purposes, **please indicate**.