On the evening of September 25, 1972, the Great Hall of the People in Beijing was full of friends, and the leaders of China and Japan met for the first time as equals. However, an unexpected statement almost brought the relationship that had been frozen for more than 70 years to an impasse again.
When they first met, ** shook hands with Kakuei Tanaka, and the atmosphere at the banquet was harmonious. However, Tanaka's phrase "causing trouble" aroused the dissatisfaction of the Chinese representatives. Question: "What do you mean?" "The whole atmosphere of the banquet went from warm to awkward.
At the summit the next day, Tanaka's remarks again caused controversy. The Japanese side has taken a vague attitude and has not been good in its rhetoric when it comes to the Taiwan issue. Speak bluntly: "Are you here to quarrel or solve problems?" "There was a dead silence in the room, and the negotiations were deadlocked.
A trip to the Great Wall to break through the deadlock.
In order to ease the tension, the Chinese side arranged a visit to the Great Wall. Ohira Masayoshi took the initiative to share the car with Ji Pengfei and started an "in-car meeting". The two sides had a frank exchange, and the dawn of breaking the deadlock finally appeared.
Ohira Masahiro is well aware of the sensitivity of the controversy and expressed his heart to Ji Pengfei. He made clear Japan's predicament, but also expressed sincerity in solving the problem. This in-car dialogue laid the groundwork for a breakthrough in negotiations.
**Domineering response: The problem is serious.
However, the principled attitude towards the Taiwan issue is uncompromising. After learning that Takashima Yoshiro said that he "cannot accept" China's point of view, he bluntly said: "Is this just the speech of a treaty director, or is it the attitude of Japan?" If it's the latter, then the problem is serious. ”
The two sides have been locked in a prolonged stalemate, and a three-day negotiation failed to make progress. It wasn't until the third day that Masahiro Ohira showed sincerity in the "in-car talks" and pointed out the direction for solving the problem.
A breakthrough was finally reached.
The difficulty of the negotiations lies not only in the expression of words, but also in the historical aggression and territorial issues. **Stick to China's bottom line and do not allow concessions. Thanks to the efforts of the delegations on both sides, especially the frank attitude of Masahiro Ohira, the deadlock was finally broken.
Harmonious response and historical adherence.
After the dust of the negotiations settled, ** once again showed the demeanor of a diplomat. At the banquet, he served dishes to Kakuei Tanaka, and the kind smile he showed in his speech conveyed a sense of friendship.
Behind this summit, however, is the historical persistence of the leaders of both sides. The firm stance of the Chinese representative on the history of aggression against China and the Taiwan issue contrasts sharply with the political troubles of the Japanese representative. Despite the breakthrough in the negotiations, the complexities of Sino-Japanese relations remain.
Summit review and future prospects.
Although this historic China-Japan summit was in an awkward and deadlock, it finally achieved a breakthrough in an atmosphere of frankness. The efforts of the delegations of both sides and the decisive response of the two sides have planted the seeds of hope for the future of China-Japan relations.
The success of the summit lies in the determination to solve problems and the establishment of mutual understanding. Through twists and turns, the leaders of China and Japan have paved the way for bilateral relations with a frank and cooperative attitude, laying the foundation for future cooperation.
This article vividly restores the scene of the 1972 Sino-Japanese relations summit, and through detailed descriptions and dialogues, readers feel as if they are in a historical moment at that time. Among them, Kakuei Tanaka's sentence of "causing trouble" became the climax of the whole article, which aroused the dissatisfaction of the Chinese representatives, made the whole atmosphere change from warm to awkward, and showed the subtle but crucial factors in the diplomatic situation.
The article vividly depicts the first meeting between *** and Kakuei Tanaka, the interaction at the banquet, and the tense confrontation at the summit, showing the complex and delicate exchanges between the leaders of the two sides at that time. In particular, the attitude of sticking to principles and facing problems head-on shows the bearing and decisiveness of a diplomat.
The impasse at the summit was broken during a visit to the Great Wall, and Ohira's candid attitude pointed the way for the negotiations. This depiction shows the wisdom and tact behind diplomacy, making the complexity of the negotiations more three-dimensional.
With regard to differences on the Taiwan issue, we have always adhered to the "one-China" principle and brooked no concessions. The article emphasizes China's adherence to historical issues and demonstrates its firm stance in the diplomatic arena. It has also sparked a new direction for dialogue between the two sides and laid the groundwork for resolving the issue.
Finally, the article summarizes the review and future prospects of the summit. Although there was an awkward and deadlock, the summit was ultimately a success through an atmosphere of candor. This shows that in diplomatic situations, understanding and cooperation are the key to solving problems. The article cleverly incorporates human elements into historical events to make it easier for readers to resonate.
Overall, this review** fully demonstrates the understanding and analysis of the content of the article. Through the description and analysis of the incident, readers can better understand the complexity of the Sino-Japanese relations summit at that time, as well as the wisdom and resourcefulness in diplomatic negotiations.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!