Since the Sanxingdui site became popular on the Internet, some Sanxingdui cultural relics have appeared all over the country, making it difficult to distinguish the authenticity. In the Chengdu antique market, a sensational Sanxingdui double game jade carving was born, if the real product will subvert the history of China's chess development. Is this true or false?Let's unravel this mystery together.
As the saying goes: "It is difficult for a god to break an inch of jade", this sentence is not only used to describe gambling stones, but also applies to the identification of jade. There is an ancient custom of gambling on stones in Yunnan, buying a stone to cut it, and the hidden gem is a winner, and an ordinary stone is a loser. Jade identification is equally elusive, with experts often likened to "a knife of poverty, a knife of wealth, and a knife of sackcloth" (death). In this process, the distinction between truth and falsehood is a headache.
For jade artifacts, some are imitations of ancient artifacts with modern jade, which is the most common and simplest way to imitate, and only needs to be treated with some acidic chemical reagents. There is also a category of imitation cultural relics with fake jade, experts not only have to identify the authenticity of the jade, but also to determine the authenticity of the cultural relics themselves, that is, whether they are in line with history. This kind of cultural relics are mainly fakes of Sanxingdui folk, such as Sanxingdui generals commanding group carvings, Sanxingdui fishing jade carvings and Sanxingdui mermaid jade carvings, which make experts cry and laugh.
As we all know, the Sanxingdui site was discovered at the end of the twenties of the last century, and it was not excavated until the eighties of the last century. During this period, it was not properly protected for 50 years, and even experienced 14 years of war. During this period, there was a situation where the Sanxingdui site was stolen and excavated, and the cultural relics may flow into the people. However, after expert investigation, it was found that in September 2003, the total number of cultural relics in Sanxingdui was about 20,000 pieces, most of which were fake cultural relics.
Experts pointed out that 90% of the folk cultural relics in Sanxingdui are fake, and some are not even Sanxingdui cultural relics at all. It is quite difficult for the average person to distinguish between these artifacts. For example, the Sanxingdui two-person jade carving in the Chengdu antique market consists of two jade figures, a chessboard and 15 chess pieces. The overall look is old and very old, which makes people mistakenly think that it is an ancient jade cultural relic from thousands of years ago.
The two jade figures are kneeling, similar to the bronze heads unearthed in Sanxingdui, with thin faces and dignified expressions, which are full of a sense of history. The board is rectangular, 65 cm long and 58 cm wide, with a unique geometric pattern on the front. Some of the patterns on the chess pieces are symbols, some are animals, and some are idols, and the meaning is difficult to understand. Experts said that this set of jade carvings depicts two ancient people playing chess, but the type of chess cannot be determined, according to the pattern of the chess pieces, it is called a fighting chess.
Chess in China has a long history and a wide variety of types. The earliest Go can be traced back to more than 4,000 years ago, that is, Yaozao Go. As for Xiangqi, it originated in the Warring States Period, called Wenbo Qi, and later changed greatly in the Tang Dynasty and gradually evolved into today's Xiangqi. There is no record of beast fighting chess in ancient China, so if the Sanxingdui double game jade carving is true, it will rewrite the history of chess in China;If it is false, it will become the garbage heap of history.
However, if you look at the Sanxingdui two-person game of jade carving from the perspective of jade, you can find the doubts. "Zhou Li, Chunguan, Dazongbo" records that jade is a sacrificial item, but Sanxingdui double game jade carving has nothing to do with sacrifice. Therefore, it is unlikely that the ancient Shu people carved such an object with jade, and experts concluded that it was a genuine fake.
Conclusion. In the process of uncovering the truth of the Sanxingdui duo game jade carving, we discovered the complex history and identification problems behind this cultural relic. The dispute over the authenticity of Sanxingdui has also made people more vigilant about the proliferation of fakes in the cultural relics market. Protecting cultural relics and clarifying history requires the unremitting efforts of experts and the rational cognition of the public. Perhaps, the truth is not always easy to uncover, and the mysteries of history are waiting for us to unlock them one by one.
This article provides a detailed interpretation of a controversial Sanxingdui two-person jade carving, as well as the history, artifacts, and expertise involved in the identification process. First of all, the author introduced the background of Sanxingdui cultural relics, pointing out that due to its popularity on the Internet, a large number of Sanxingdui cultural relics have emerged across the country, making it difficult to distinguish the authenticity of the cultural relics into a serious problem. This provides the reader with a clear background and raises concerns about the authenticity of the artifact.
Secondly, the article delves into the complexity of jade identification, cleverly introduces the metaphor of gambling stones, and emphasizes the difficulty of professional identification. Through the explanation of modern imitation and fake jade imitation cultural relics, the article conveys to the reader that the authenticity of jade requires both the jade itself and the history of the cultural relics. This part not only enables readers to have a deeper understanding of jade identification, but also lays the foundation for the follow-up of Sanxingdui's double game of jade carving.
In the specific discussion of the Sanxingdui cultural relics, the author made a brief review of the history of the ancient Shu civilization and highlighted the particularity of the Sanxingdui site. By introducing the shape, pattern and historical background of the cultural relic, the article leads the reader into the examination of the Sanxingdui double game jade carving. Through the combing of the form of cultural relics, the history of chess, and the comparison with sacrificial articles, the article echoes the authenticity of fakes. Finally, the author concludes, emphasizing that this is a fake, making the whole article logical and hierarchical.
At the end of the article, by raising questions about the market for cultural relics and the proliferation of fakes, the author calls for more careful protection of cultural relics and advocates the importance of professional identification and rational public perception. This gives a deeper social meaning to the whole article, guides readers to pay attention to the protection of cultural relics, and forms a positive social viewpoint.
Overall, this review not only provides an in-depth analysis of the Sanxingdui two-person game of jade carving, but also integrates the discussion on the protection of cultural relics and the identification of difficult problems, so that readers can not only understand the ins and outs of a specific cultural relic, but also think about the significance and impact of cultural relics identification and protection on society.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!