In the Cao-Liu War, although the scale of the Battle of Hanzhong was not as large as the famous three major battles of the Three Kingdoms, it had a far-reaching impact on Shu Han. From 217 to 219 AD, the two-year war ended in a victory for Shu Han, and Liu Bei proclaimed himself "King of Hanzhong" after taking Hanzhong. However, it is worth noting that during this period, why didn't Liu Bei's ally Sun Quan help Liu Bei take the opportunity to attack Cao Cao?
The uneven interests led to dissatisfaction in Soochow.
Before the Battle of Chibi, Cao Cao led a large army to conquer Eastern Wu, and after the victory of the Battle of Chibi, Eastern Wu did not get the desired benefits. In contrast, Shu Han did not make much effort but gained a lot of benefits, four of the seven counties of Jingzhou were returned to Shu Han, and then "borrowed" Nanyang County. Liu Bei rejected Zhou Yu's "false way" strategy, which deepened the contradiction between the two sides.
In 212 AD, during the great battle between Eastern Wu and Cao Wei, Liu Bei verbally promised to support Sun Quan, but was actually taking the opportunity to seize Xichuan. This violated the spirit of the covenant and led to a rift in the alliance between Sun and Liu. In 215 AD, Guan Yu and Sun Quan fought for Jingzhou, and finally reconciled and divided Jingzhou equally, showing that there was a contradiction between the allies.
Changes in Soochow's personnel and policies.
At the time of Liu Bei's battle in Hanzhong, Eastern Wu underwent changes. The metropolitan governor Lu Su died, and Lu Su advocated "linking Liu to resist Cao", maintaining the relationship between Shu Han and Eastern Wu. After Lu Su's death, he was succeeded by Lü Meng, who advocated a policy of "swallowing Liu and being arrogant", which led to divisions among allies. Although Eastern Wu confronted Cao Wei on the battlefield, it did not gain obvious benefits, and in addition to the setback in the Battle of Hefei, Sun Quan married Cao Cao, and the alliance between Sun and Liu existed in name only.
Raising a tiger must pull out its arms for trouble.
After Liu Bei victoriously captured Hanzhong, the power of Shu Han was further expanded, and Liu Feng and Meng Da obtained the three counties of Shangyong. Liu Bei thus became the "King of Hanzhong" and posed a threat to Eastern Wu. Guan Yu was dismissive of Jiangdong in Jingzhou and had a conflict with Sun Quan. Guan Yu launched the Battle of Xiangfan, and Eastern Wu had already implemented a strategy. Lü Meng praised Lu Xun and confused Guan Yu so that he could mobilize the Jingzhou army, and finally Eastern Wu easily captured Jingzhou, and Guan Yu was defeated and took Maicheng.
Analysis of the reasons for the rupture of the Sun and Liu alliance.
The first alliance between Sun and Liu was to jointly resist Cao Cao, but Liu Bei was weak at that time and could not take into account the interests of Eastern Wu, which caused Sun Quan to be dissatisfied. The alliance of Sun and Liu became enemies, showing that "there are no eternal friends, only eternal interests".
Epilogue. Although the Battle of Hanzhong was relatively small, its far-reaching impact caused the alliance between Sun and Liu to break down in the Battle of Cao and Liu. The contradictions between the allies are mainly caused by unequal interests, changes in personnel policies, and the expansion of power. This history reminds us that in the political arena, interests are often the basis of alliances, and short-term victories may not mask long-term contradictions.
The rupture of the Sun-Liu alliance Cao Liu vs. Wu in the Middle East, why didn't Wu help Shu Han?This article profoundly explains the reasons for the collapse of the alliance between Sun and Liu during the Three Kingdoms period. From a historical point of view, the article is clearly structured and logical, with detailed descriptions and analyses of key events and figures.
First, the article mentions the issue of uneven interests in explaining the reasons for the breakdown of the alliance, emphasizing that after the Battle of Chibi, Eastern Wu failed to obtain the desired benefits, while Shu Han gained most of the seven counties of Jingzhou without much contribution. This unfair distribution directly led to the dissatisfaction of Soochow and laid a hidden danger for the alliance relationship.
Secondly, the article deeply analyzes the changes in personnel and policies of Soochow. The change of Lu Su and Lü Meng's positions as governors of Eastern Wu led to a change in the policy towards Shu Han. Lu Su advocated "uniting Liu to resist Cao", while Lü Meng proposed a policy of "swallowing Liu and being arrogant", and this policy difference directly led to a rift in the relationship between Sun and Liu. At the same time, Eastern Wu paid a huge price on the frontal battlefield without obtaining substantial benefits, which also made Sun Quan gradually doubt the alliance with Liu Bei.
The article also focuses on the problem of tiger breeding. With Liu Bei's victory in the Battle of Hanzhong, Shu Han's power expanded significantly, and Liu Bei proclaimed himself "King of Hanzhong", posing a potential threat to Eastern Wu. Guan Yu clashed with Jiangdong in Jingzhou, which exacerbated the contradictions between the two families. When Sun Quan launched the Battle of Xiangfan, Sun Quan sent Lu Xun to skillfully arrange and successfully capture Jingzhou, showing the danger of raising tigers and laying the groundwork for the collapse of the Sun and Liu alliance.
In general, the article not only comprehensively analyzes the reasons for the rupture of the Sun and Liu alliances, but also reveals the common problems in the political alliance through an in-depth analysis of historical events. By studying Xi history, we can better understand the complexities of international relations and political alliances, as well as deepen our understanding of current international affairs. Through a review of history, this article reminds us of the importance of equality and mutual benefit in alliances, while always being wary of the breakdown of relationships due to divergent interests.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!