Today, with the aging population and the increasing number of various problems, the pension of the elderly in China has attracted more and more attention. In response to the pension crisis, the state has successively introduced a delayed retirement system, but it has been opposed by different strata of the public.
Prior to the implementation of delayed retirement, the legal retirement age in China was 60 for men and 50 for women, while female cadres could request retirement at 55. Those who have taken the initiative to pay social security for 15 years at work can also receive a considerable pension after retirement, thus improving the life of the elderly in their later years.
Endowment insurance is a major right and interest given to the people in China, which aims to ensure that every elderly employee can "rely on the old and provide for the old".
Many people are against postponing retirement, and most importantly, the current staff have reached the age of retirement, which is not very beneficial to their work, and most of the jobs are vacant, and if there is not enough time, it will affect the work of new employees.
After the implementation of the postponement of retirement policy, both in the establishment system and among public officials, it is a good thing for them to get more wages at work, but if they want to raise the pension of future cadres, then their work will be more difficult, and at the same time, it will bring more jobs to college students, and the job opportunities provided to them will also be reduced, which is very disadvantageous.
And those people's teachers who have been working hard for many years and have been engaged in education work for many years are also unwilling to see the implementation of the postponement of the retirement system.
Postponing retirement is coming to an end, and people who count by year are coming, and it's a one-sided rhythm!
At present, there is a deficit in China's pension, with the increase of national retirees, each person can receive a pension of 5,000-8,000 yuan per year, and if you want to let the elderly retire get enough pension, there must be more than 10 people to pay together.
Therefore, the relevant parties decided to implement a postponement retirement system and postpone the statutory retirement age of 60 to 65 years old, so as to reduce the pressure on the elderly to pay premiums and alleviate the shortage of pension insurance funds.
However, there was a lot of resistance to the implementation of this plan, so the relevant parties, for example, took one teacher, temporarily abolished the delayed retirement and implemented the method of calculating on an annual basis.
Calculated according to working hours, that is, calculated according to working hours, a preferential system for applying for early retirement, taking the profession of people's teacher as an example, if the teacher has worked in the job for 20 years, he can decide whether to retire early according to his own conditions.
The work of a teacher seems very simple, but in fact it is a very tiring thing, and many teachers have a special professional Xi, that is, back pain and physical weakness. Most teachers want to retire early and get a pension.
If the Education Department really wants to implement the length of service system for all teachers, then their retirement plans will be disrupted. It can allow elderly teachers to retire early, realize what they like, get pensions early, and improve the quality of life of the elderly. And it will create more jobs for them.
Compared with the deferred retirement system, the working years system should be more humane, and the biggest difficulty encountered by the reasonable working years system is also the pension problem. The corresponding state is also gradually increasing our pension benefits to encourage staff to take the initiative to contribute, only in this way can our pensions continue to provide us with more pensions and improve their quality of life in old age.
What do you think about the implementation of the service year system?Do you think the current retirement system is reasonable?