I wrote an article about a judge's own civil case and did not win the case, the judge thought that the evidence was sufficient and he won the case, and he himself judged that this kind of case could be won, but the result was shocking, losing the case in the first instance, and then appealing.
It's been a long time, and now the results of the second instance have come down, and the first instance is upheld. It took 2 years of hard work, the evidence was insufficient, and the claims were not supported. This case is a foreign case, and in the course of the progress of the case, the judge of the case will inevitably know the identity of the parties, after all, they are public officials, and some also need to directly write the identity information of the judgment documents. And it can also be seen from this incident:
1. The judge's own case is not necessarily advantageous in a foreign court. The territoriality of the court will inevitably have an impact on the outcome of the case.
2. The sufficiency of evidence is affected by the judge's discretion.
3. As a plaintiff, regarding the preparation of evidence, there is no perfect preparation.
4. The impact of the second instance on the first instance exists.
5. Before the results of the case come out, no one knows who will win.
Now the judge is preparing to apply for a retrial, because he has plans to resign as a lawyer, and he is not very taboo about this matter, and he also talked about it when chatting, and his mentality is as stable as ever.