In the early 60s of the last century, he explained to him several times that the package production to households is conducive to agricultural development and get rid of the food dilemma, but the vice premier said bluntly: "The package production to households has been carried out for thousands of years, do you still want to do it?"If you carry out package production to households, it will not take a few years for someone to hire workers and ask for a little wife, and there will be polarization. Although he has been criticized and even blamed many times, he still sticks to his own opinion, believing that there is nothing wrong with the delivery of the goods to the households, and it will not shake the foundation of the socialist system. This led to *** being removed from his post and being criticized by leaders *** and others who had supported him. During the ten years of turmoil, ** died of illness in 1972 and was severely affected.
After his death, he was given a fair and objective evaluation. He said that he has a strong personality and dares to tell the truth, but he engages in conspiracy and does not engage in conspiracy. It can be seen from his point of view that he opposed the delivery of production to households in those years, thinking that this would be the same as the production mode of farmers working alone in history, which was a kind of retrogressionThe second is that they think that doing so will lead to a gap between the rich and the poor and lead to polarization, so that the peasants will suffer twice more. Therefore, when the batch of production was delivered to the household, it was a "single dry wind".
In the turbulent era, due to the large-scale class struggle, the delivery of the goods to the households was labeled as destroying the collective economy and the people's communes, taking the capitalist road and the revisionist line, and so on. However, after the reform and opening up, the package production to households was fully affirmed and vigorously promoted at the 12th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. However, in the past three to five years, the level of agricultural production has been greatly improved, and the vast number of peasants have been completely freed from the problem of food and clothing that has plagued them for many years.
The practice of the Liberation War proved that people's worries about the polarization brought about by the package production to the household did not come true. This is because after the completion of socialist transformation, the ownership of rural land has been returned to the state and collectives, and it is not allowed to buy and sell freely. This is completely different from going it alone in history. Not only did the vast number of peasants suffer twice but also quickly solved the problem of food and clothing. Our country is still a socialist New China. The revolutionary predecessors have always insisted that "there is nothing wrong with the delivery of goods to households" is completely correct.