Title:
"Graphite is limited to iron ore counterattack!It's not a big deal to see the excitement of the international business war, so what's the problem?”
Hey, military fans, it's not been quiet on the international battlefield recently!Have you paid attention to China's "graphite limit" and Australia's "iron ore counterattack"?Don't look at these are just two raw materials, in fact, there is a complex international drama behind this. Today, the veteran wants to deeply analyze the behind-the-scenes story of this "** game" with you.
First of all, let's talk about our China, how to say, graphite is a great "sweet pastry" for us. Electric vehicle batteries, mobile phones, computers, these are indispensable graphite. Recently, our country has introduced a policy to restrict graphite exports, which seems simple, but in fact, it implies mystery. On the one hand, this can ensure the stability of our domestic industrial chain, on the other hand, it is also for environmental considerations, after all, graphite mining and processing has a bit of an impact on the environment.
Then, when they moved to Australia, these Australians came to a "tooth for tooth" operation. They have a good hand of iron ore in their hands, and Australia is a super rich place for iron ore. In the face of China's graphite export restrictions, they targeted our weak link and countered with iron ore. Why?Iron ore is indispensable in the production of steel, which in turn is the cornerstone of a country's industrial development and infrastructure. Therefore, their trick can be said to be playing a resource "game".
This reminds me of the bloody battles of nations over resources on the eve of the Great War. China and Australia are interdependent, but have unique advantages in resources in some areas. You restrict me this, and I fight back against you, which seems to be a petty fight, but in fact, there are deep-seated strategic considerations behind it.
Speaking of which, I want to remind you that it is really difficult to say who the real winner is of this "you come and go" strategy. Restricting the export of resources may trigger a series of chain reactions, which will eventually affect the stability of the global ** chain, and may even affect our ordinary consumers. Electric vehicles and electronics may increase in price due to raw material shortages, which is not good for us.
While it sounds like a wonderful "you hire me back" game now, in the long run, veterans feel that this friction can be resolved through negotiation and cooperation. After all, mutual benefit and win-win is the last word, don't let our small characters suffer in the international drama.
In short, the international world is like a war without gunpowder, and resources are the bargaining chips in the hands of every country. China's graphite and Australia's iron ore are just two pawns in this game. We military fans can see some strategic wisdom in it, but let's not forget that the ultimate impact will fall on the daily lives of each of us. I hope that this "game" can finally have a win-win result, after all, world peace and development is the last word, isn't it?