Crimea's "secession from Ukraine and entry into Russia" is too poor a strategic choice, and we do not support it!Crimea, a peninsula on the northern shore of the Black Sea, has been rich in history and culture since ancient times.
In 1918, Crimea joined Russia and became part of it. However, in 1954, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine, a decision that later became the source of the Ukrainian Crimean problem.
Crimea's recognition of Ukraine is not high, and this stems from a number of reasons. First of all, a significant part of the population of Crimea is ethnic Russians, who have a low sense of national identity with Ukraine.
Secondly, due to political corruption and economic difficulties in Ukraine, the socio-economic development of Crimea is relatively lagging behind, which also exacerbates the contradictions between Crimea and Ukraine. In 1991, the first referendum was held in Crimea, the results of which showed that the overwhelming majority of the population supported independence and wanted to return to the bosom of Russia.
However, this wish was not immediately fulfilled due to the fact that the USSR was in a state of disintegration at that time. In the years that followed, the population of Crimea continued to express dissatisfaction with Ukrainian rule.
In an effort to quell resentment in Crimea, Ukraine and Crimea signed a treaty in 1997 in which they mutually recognized and respected Crimea's autonomous status and agreed not to expand their armed forces. However, in 2008, Crimea once again declared independence, an act that the Ukrainian authorities considered a violation of the aforementioned agreement.
In 2014, political reforms in Ukraine sparked discontent among ethnic Russians in Crimea, who seized the opportunity to launch a campaign to "leave Ukraine and join Russia." In a national referendum, the overwhelming majority of Crimean residents voted to join Russia.
However, this decision caused widespread controversy and doubts in the international community, and many countries and international organizations did not recognize the accession of Crimea. From the point of view of international law, the "secession of Crimea from Ukraine to Russia" is a controversial act.
First, the accession of Crimea violates international treaties, such as the UN Charter and the Helsinki Accords. Secondly, although the "right to self-determination" of the inhabitants of Crimea is an important principle of international law, it does not justify the arbitrary cutting of the territory of the State.
Finally, the actions of the Crimean authorities were carried out without the permission of the Ukrainian *** and violated the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. In summary, we believe that the actions of Crimea are a violation of international law and should not be supported.
In resolving the Crimea issue, all parties should adhere to the principles of international law and find a reasonable solution through dialogue and negotiation. At the same time, Ukraine should also intensify its efforts to promote internal political and economic reforms in order to improve relations between Ukraine and Crimea and rebuild trust and harmony between them.
Finally, we call on the international community to pay attention to the Crimea issue and work together to uphold international fairness and justice.