Many people say that Kobe Bryant is most like Danzi, and there are also comparison highlights, but in fact, it is more about the back-to-back jumpers of two people, Kobe Bryant is more elegant in appearance, yes, more elegant than Danzi. Danzi, you will know if you look carefully and take a closer look, Danzi's style is to finish concisely and concisely, there are no superfluous movements, which is also related to his movement is too talented and too **, there is no need to sway left and right, just look at the footage of Iverson when he was young. So the conclusion is that Danzi pursues efficiency in playing, and at the same time, he can play dazzling, but even if he plays dazzling, it gives people a very hard feeling.
Speaking of the card, it is said that he is the card needle version of Danzi, which makes sense. The flexibility of the card is poor, so it doesn't look too smooth, but the simplicity and efficiency of the card style is definitely the closest to the helper, and the charm of turning and back-to-back shooting is more similar than Kobe, I believe you can experience it by looking at their comparison in the past. There is also a card that is not as elegant as Kobe's style of ball, and the control of the ball is not as skilled as Kobe, don't believe it, you see that the helper is also not pursuing a high-level control of the luck, but the helper can finish and win you by looking at the talent and simplicity and efficiency. The ultimate goal of playing is to finish and win, no one's style is good or bad, and for example, Owen's flower work is definitely one of the most, and Dengzi's airlift is basically to constantly stir-fry and use rhythm to break through and retreat (by the way, Dengzi should be the largest proportion of stir-fry in the history of the league and use this finish the most), so our perception is that it is easier for the stool to score than Irving, but the viewing may be worse, after all, Wenzi has more difficult goals.
From the analysis of the last two shots of today's game, the card turned around and slipped the bottom line directly to dunk, the obvious impression is simple and efficient, giving us the feeling that I went to end it so easily, and the card dunk is basically not showy, for him, the dunk is just one of the ways to finish, and the score is enough. But the main player is strong because he can use his talent to make such neat and efficient finishes, and he can also put the ball into the basket with some incredible and juggling moves under the opponent's high-intensity defense. The operation of the helper can be said to be a routine operation in his career, and others may occasionally make it with inspiration, which is the rebellion of the helper.
So the conclusion is that most of the cases of the helper are concise and efficient finishes, and when encountering high-end games, the use of talent and technology can also be used to finish with flowers, the control is not cool, the three points are not strong but not outstanding, and the hard solution ability is unique. Kobe Bryant did learn a lot of skills from the helper, but the physical talent was still inferior to the helper, so he practiced more control and increased the three-point. What about the card, the physical talent, especially the static talent, I think it is stronger than Kobe, with a long arm span and big hands, especially the big hands remember to be about the same size as O'Neal (when I was a child, when I read basketball magazines, there was a page that was the help master's big hand one-to-one** is really exaggerated), so the card chose to specialize in the simple and efficient play of the helper, which is absolutely correct, and the low shooting arc of the card is also very similar to the helper. Coupled with the defense of the card death entanglement, it gives us the impression that it is contemporary Jordan, the so-called integration of offense and defense, the road is simple, and the focus is on the end, which is the machine card. #nba#