Last year, textbooks for primary and secondary school students were exposedContains "insulting China" and sexually suggestive content, so that the safety of teaching materials into the public eye again, for a while,The safety of teaching materials has become a top priority for society.
Experts from all walks of life and parents of students have expressed their viewsThere is a posture of sending the compiler of the textbook to step on the sewing machine, but among these voices there is also a part of the parents, to our countryA poem that has been recited to this dayThere are also quite a few opinions.
Many parents think some of the poems"Use of words**"., will affect the physical and mental health of teenagers, requiring that these poems be all"Kick out".Textbook.
Is there really something wrong with these poems? Is there something wrong with the poetry or is there something wrong with the concept?
Parking and sitting in love with the maple forest evening", "Little lotus shows sharp corners", "hoeing at noon on the day", "Spring Festival is worth a thousand gold"...
I'm afraid Du Mu, Yang Wanli, Li Shen, and Su Shi can't think of their own poems"Pornography".Some parents are clamoring to remove the textbook.
It's obviously a famous poem that has been sung for thousands of years, why is it sudden"Thunderstorm".Got it?
Some parents claimedThe phrase "park, sit and love" will give people room for reverie, will lead people to think in a bad place, how can this kind of words appear in the textbook to teach students?
There is also such a problem in sentences like "the little lotus shows the sharp corners", which was originally used by Yang Wanli to praise the small pond and the green shade, the lotus and the small pond together, and love nature.
But it was singled out by some parentsIt is misinterpreted as a description of the girl's posture.
What's more, there are still some people who think that the poem "Noon on the Day of Hoe" is no longer a hintInstead, it is explicitly "sexually explicit" in its contents, if Li Shen knew that his poem of compassion for the peasants was interpreted in this way, he would probably jump out of the coffin in anger.
Su Shi usedA verse that exhorts people to cherish their timeIt is also distorted to cherish the things of men and women.
There are many more examples of these, such as Li Bai, Luo Guanzhong, and other historical literati who have also been "picked up" for poems related to pornography, and the examples given by these parents have made netizens laugh and cry and laugh, but also have some anger.
Obviously, these verses have been sung for thousands of years, and no one has ever said this under the old feudal ideas in the pastWhy is it that in the new century, thinking has turned backwards?
In response to the criticism of netizens, these parents also said that netizens have no children yet, and when they have children, they will know how important education is to start with dolls.
There are also some netizens who already have children to refute this, but they still have various reasonsThat is to say, these poems will be"Bad".Child.
I have to say that these parents' ability to leap forward in thinking is so strong that people are "amazing"., for the words of these parents, netizens also feel helpless.
Obviously they are all very normal poems, but in the mouths of these parents, they have become "big rebellion", in their opinion, these are all poemsPoisoning teenagers"Spiritual opium".
And this kind of voice is not new to this year, evenSome cartoonsAll of them are interpreted by parents as affecting the healthy growth of adolescents"Garbage".
When cartoons were just emerging in my country, there were many excellent animation works in my countryThe worldview, plot and values of these works are of great help even if they are put in the world.
But as more and more parents like this, these works have been pasted"Bloody violence", ".labels have been reported and taken off the shelves.
What's even more speechless is that it is all the rage"Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf".Reported by parentsViolence as well as ***, the reason is because there are too many scenes of the red wolf beating the gray wolf with a frying pan.
The cartoon that was once popular all over the country also came to an abrupt end.
But what they don't know is that cartoons like Pleasant Goat are banned abroad, because some foreign countries think that cartoons like Pleasant Goat are likely to be passed on to children."Danger will always be defused".Such misinformation.
Among them, the difference in parenting thinking is something we have to face.
The atmosphere of overcorrection is becoming more and more popular, which reminds people of the prevalence during the Ming and Qing dynasties
In the Qing Dynasty, Xu Jun's sentence:"Mo Dao is small, and he still has a heart for the night. Qingfeng can't read, why do you flip through books? was reported by others, so that the Qing court thought that he was mocking the Manchus.
As a result, it was all over the place, which made people sigh.
Isn't the remarks of these parents now similar to those of the *** at that time? Just being taken out of context is crowned"It is not conducive to the physical and mental health of adolescents".The name.
Those who know that these are the parents of the new era who grew up under the red flagI don't know and I think I'm facing itThe old man of the Manchu Qing DynastyThis.
Parking and sitting in love with Fenglin late, not to mention the meaning of the whole poem and this sentence, these parents did not understand the meaning of the word "sit" aloneThis "sitting" is not "doing", it means because, due to, and not theseThe old man of the Manchu Qing DynastyVerbs of comprehension.
Sometimes it's very helpless to see these parents shouting and shoutingAttention should be paid to the education and physical and mental health of young people, but he made such a low-level mistake.
What they didn't notice was that they made oneCognitive errors, when they are exposed to enough information in society to look at something, they will naturally use itCognition influenced by information to look at problems.
But they don't take into account that young children or teenagers,Their perception was not influenced by other factorsIn their cognition, most of what they learn comes from the teacher's teaching and explanation, and the information they receive and learn also comes from the teacher's teaching.
Now these parents impose their own perceptions on their childrenCover the children's understanding with your own understanding, and the result must be wrong.
No matter how you do a problem that has been distorted, you will definitely get something wrong in the end.
These parents' misinterpretations of literary works, film and television works, and even game works have gradually made us see them onlineGreen blood, black bloodSome of the more sensitive words are sometimes replaced by a "beep" sound.
The act of denouncing lightly and reporting at every turn makes the shackles around the necks of literary and artistic creators heavier and heavier, there are more and more literary and artistic works that are young and infantilized.
Ask yourself, is this kind of education really suitable for children? To protect children's physical and mental health, must we let children reject all external environmental influences?
So what's the use of parents? What's the use of a teacher? What is the use of education?
Education is not protection, the purpose of education is to grow, blindly lock children in ivory towers, watching dolls and little people do childish games every day, is this really helpful for children's growth?
Over-interpretation of famous works, over-interpretation of literary and artistic works,Isn't this a bit too stressful?
Excessive out-of-context quotes make handed down poems, historical celebrities, and literary and artistic works lose their meaning in the eyes of these parents, full of these will affect their children's physical and mental health.
These excellent cultural works and historical celebrities have become stumbling blocks on the road to their children's success. Delete! Delete! This is their only interpretation of the classics.
However, these parents have an almost uniform characteristic, that is, they like to find problems in other people's education, and the author has briefly communicated with some parents who have such thoughts.
They think that the child is at schoolEducation is the responsibility of the teacherIf you don't teach it well, it must be a problem with the teacher, which is basically the same opinionIt's suffocating
Education is multi-directional, it comes from teachers, from schools, from society, and from families。It can even be said that when children are growing up, parents and teachers are responsible for the main body of education.
Teachers can teach knowledge and improve their studies. But in fact, teachers play a far less important role in shaping students' views and values than parents.
These parents are afraid of this and that, and feel that anything will affect their children's physical and mental healthBut if you blindly build an ivory tower for your child, will the eagle still have a chance to spread its wings?
Now students are under a lot more academic pressure than beforeIn society, it is not uncommon for suicide to occur because of unsatisfactory test resultsEven if the state has repeatedly reduced the burden, the effect is not obvious.
How much psychological endurance can children under such protection have?
Ignoring the role of educators and targeting textbooks out of context is not advisableParents are also the main body of education, and the guidance of parents to their children is very important for children.
Many parents will be in education"Xi inertia".When they don't meet a good teacher, the child's grades are not satisfactory, they will complain that the teacher is not good at teaching, and when they meet a famous teacher, the child's grades are still not satisfactory, and they will think that the child is not careful.
"Don't care".These three words are "nirvana" for children, these parentsdoes not look at any objective factors, but subjectively "divides" the reasons for the child's poor grades to the teacher and the child, he is "ice clear and jade", and he has no responsibility.
Isn't this a mistake?
It is also for this reason that these parents over-interpret the textbookSubjectively apply your own point of view to your child, but they ignore the age of the childIgnoring the fact that children receive information primarily from teachers and parents.
Because of their own misinterpretation, they have to rudely brand everything as bad factors that affect the healthy growth of childrenThis is both ignorance and a regression of the mind.
Moreover, for example, the aforementioned "parking and sitting love Fenglin evening", in which the word "sitting love" was originally a homonym translated from the Western "make love".The translation homophony of Western words is forcibly used as a commentary on traditional Chinese poetry.
This in itself is a ridiculously wrong thing, and it is put on the table by these parents in a matter of fact. Isn't that a joke?
A generation of literary masterpieces such as "Burrow", "Back", and "Crossing the Zero Ding Yang" have all been pushed to the stage of criticism by these parents, which can't help but make people feel sad.
The meaning of literary works is to motivate and teach people the spiritual motivation to move forward. Blindly chewing words and taking words out of context is a step backwards for the times.
The existence of Baguwen and *** once imprisoned the minds of literati, and they didn't even dare to give full play to their own literary talents, for fear of being caught and over-interpreting any words.
This is the right moment at that moment
What is a "poisonous textbook"? It has no educational significance, and even distorts the facts to lead people to evil, so it is called a poisonous textbook. But to over-interpret the classics,The "poison" is not the textbook, but the people.