In ancient times, wealthy families such as dignitaries, landlords, and wealthy merchants often hired a large number of maids and slaves at home. "Dream of Red Mansions" describes six or seven hundred people in the Jia family, more than 20 maids and slaves who take care of Jia Baoyu alone, more than a dozen subordinates who were directly called by Wang Xifeng, and five or six who take care of Lin Daiyu's life. Under the service of slaves, the rich people in ancient times lived a privileged life.
The rich of the present day are richer than in ancient times, but why don't they hire slaves anymore?
1.The times have progressed, and the personal dependency relationship has been abolished.
In ancient times, personal dependency between people was allowed, and in many cases human trafficking was permitted. A contract for the sale of human beings is a deed of sale, and parents can sell their children because the children are the private property of the parents. The husband and the wife can sell the concubine, and it is illegal for the husband to sell the wife. In ancient times, rich people could legally buy a lot of maids and slaves, and after buying them, they became the masters of the maids and slaves, and they could use them at will. Modern society has basically abolished personal dependency, and there are no slaves to buy.
2.Productivity progressed, and modern services replaced the labor of slaves.
In ancient times, the productive forces were backward, the population was large, and there were few employment opportunities, and the people at the bottom could not survive, so many people could only rely on the rich to survive, or even become slaves. Now there are more employment opportunities than in ancient times, and there is less pressure to survive than in ancient times, and there is no need for ordinary people to become slaves. The productivity of modern society has made great progress, and much of the labor of ancient slaves has been replaced by modern services. All kinds of household appliances are fully functional, the social order is better than in ancient times, there are many urban entertainment facilities, and most of the things that slaves can do have been replaced.
3.The feudal landlords were replaced by the bourgeoisie.
In primitive society, slave society, and feudal society, due to the backwardness of the productive forces, the rule of the upper strata over the lower strata of society was very cruel and explicit, and the means of ruling were very direct and backward, and obviously needed to be improved. After the advent of capitalist society, the former chieftains, slave owners, and feudal aristocratic landlords were all defeated by the capitalists, and the past means of ruling were eliminated. The capitalists' means of domination are hidden, indirect and efficient. On the surface, the capitalists stopped buying slaves, but in fact they only transferred the slaves from the ancients to the factory assembly line.
Why did the contemporary plutocrats abandon the ancient slavery system?
With the progress of society and the change of values, the contemporary rich gradually abandoned the ancient slavery system. This transformation stems from the development of the times, the progress of human civilization, and the transformation of social structure. Although the modern plutocrats are wealthier, they are more focused on personal freedom and social justice, and no longer seek to show their status by employing slaves. With the development of technology and the popularization of modern services and equipment, people can enjoy convenient life more easily and no longer need to rely on a large number of slaves. Thus, despite their affluence, the contemporary plutocrats have chosen to abandon the ancient system of slavery and embrace a more egalitarian and liberal society.
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the reasons why the ancient wealthy hired slaves and the modern wealthy no longer adopted the system, as well as the social factors behind this evolution. From a historical and social point of view, I agree with the author's point of view and am willing to take this topic further.
First of all, the article mentions the progress of the times and the abolition of personal dependency. By abolishing personal dependency, modern society pursues values of greater equality and respect for individual rights. This progress has allowed individuals to have more freedom and no longer be dominated by others. With the continuous development of society, human dignity has gradually become an important value orientation, replacing the ancient slave system.
Secondly, the significant increase in modern productivity is also one of the reasons pointed out in the article. With the advancement of technology and the development of society, many jobs that once required slaves to be completed have been replaced by modern services and equipment. This reflects society's new demand for labor and innovation in the way of working. Modern people pay more attention to efficient and convenient lifestyles, which makes the services provided by slaves gradually fade out of people's lives.
Finally, the article emphasizes the transformation of the social structure of the feudal landlords being replaced by the bourgeoisie. The rise of capitalism broke with the old system of domination, and the rich no longer used slavery to assert their status. The transformation of society has led to the gradual replacement of the system of domination based on oppression by more subtle and efficient methods. This has led the modern rich to pay more attention to privacy and individual rights than to a large number of slaves.
Overall, this article profoundly reflects the evolution of society and the change of people's values through a comparison between ancient and contemporary societies. Through the analysis of history and social institutions, the author proposes a reasonable and profound explanation for the fact that the contemporary plutocrats no longer employ slaves. This point of view has led me to think more about the structure and values of modern society, and it has also inspired me to think about the direction of social progress.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!