The distribution of military school graduates is passive and uncertain, and they are faced with a fixed range of options and information asymmetry. This situation has different impacts on young people's careers, so it is necessary to make comprehensive judgments and decisions based on various conditions.
The distribution choices faced by military academy graduates are different from those of local college students, and they cannot submit their resumes to choose their own units, but face a fixed range of choices and uncertain situations. This leads to greater passivity and uncertainty in their faces. Passivity is mainly reflected in the limited range of choices and the influence of sorting, and the inability to freely choose the ideal option. Trainees often want to be able to choose the department or unit they are interested in, but due to the limitations of the distribution system, this may not be possible. This passivity makes it difficult for young people to choose a job.
Passivity is accompanied by uncertainty. For military academy graduates, the information behind the name of the unit is unknown, such as the ecological environment, management level, growth channel, station, and mission. However, these factors will have a considerable impact on young people's career development in the future. As a result, it is difficult for young people to have a comprehensive picture of the situation in these units before deciding on their options, and they have to face uncertainty.
However, despite the passivity and uncertainty faced by military school graduates, different distribution options can still make a difference in their careers. This can also be seen as an information asymmetry, which makes it difficult for most young people to allocate choices. With the exception of a few who have family decision-making aids, most trainees can only make choices based on the name of their unit. When faced with the allocation of places, the trainees only know the name of the unit, and it is difficult to make an accurate judgment about whether the unit is suitable for selection.
In order to cope with this situation, we need to consider all the allocation conditions together. It mainly includes the main tasks of the unit, the nature of the work, the location of the unit and the station of the direct superior of the unit, as well as the overall atmosphere, humanistic ecology and cadre growth atmosphere of the unit. In addition, it is necessary to consider the future development of the assigned troops, to understand the possible direction of development. Those who can choose the navy give priority to the navy, then the air force, and try to avoid difficult units such as the army, and similar selection strategies can help students make initial judgments to a certain extent. However, in order to make a better choice, trainees need to further understand the characteristics and development potential of each unit, and make a final decision based on their own interests and career plans.
Due to the existence of information asymmetry, young people face great uncertainty and difficulties in allocating choices. To solve this problem, military academies and relevant departments can strengthen information disclosure and transparency, provide detailed unit introductions and data support, so that cadets can understand each unit more comprehensively and objectively, so as to make more informed choices. Military academy graduates are faced with passive and uncertain distribution choices, and need to comprehensively consider various aspects, such as the main tasks of the unit and the nature of the work; the stationing of the unit, as well as the station of the immediate superior of the unit; The overall atmosphere of the unit, especially the humanistic ecology, the atmosphere of cadre growth, etc. If the unit is assigned to this unit, what are the reasonable possibilities for future development?
We'll talk about this information in more detail in a later article. Please look forward to it.