Recently, the Baihushan overrun detection station in Linli County, Hunan Province, has received widespread attention due to an incident related to oranges. The incident began when a batch of oranges was detained by the inspectors at the testing station, and then something puzzling happened.
Specifically, the subject of this incident is Mr. Mou, who experienced an annoying and angry incident on December 4, 2023. Mr. Mou hired a truck to transport a large number of oranges from Shimen County, Hunan Province, to Changchun. However, during transportation, the truck full of oranges was stopped at the Baihushan Overrun Detection Station in Linli County on the grounds of overloading.
According to Mr. Mou's account, his truck was stopped at 8:18 p.m. on December 4. During the subsequent inspection, the staff of the testing station unloaded some of the oranges for inspection. But strangely, these unloaded oranges then mysteriously disappeared. It is said that the original 8 baskets of oranges have been reduced to only 4 and a half baskets.
Mr. Mou was extremely angry about this, arguing that the staff at the testing station did not have the right to consume the oranges, and posted on the Internet, hoping to use the power of the Internet to seek justice. Mr. Mou insisted that he was unhappy with the station's actions and demanded that the staff publicly apologize and accept the corresponding punishment.
According to Mr. Mou, his truck was detained by the inspection station for overloading and eight baskets of oranges were unloaded from the truck for temporary seizure. However, Mr. Mou vehemently denied the allegations of overloading, arguing that his truck was not overloaded and that the total weight of the eight baskets of oranges was just over 150 kilograms, which was not enough to constitute overloading.
What is even more shocking is that when Mr. Mou returned to the testing station the next day to retrieve the oranges, he found that only four and a half baskets of the original eight baskets remained. This made Mr. Mou extremely confused and angry: Obviously the previous seizure was 8 baskets of oranges, how could it be reduced so much overnight?
Mr. Mou asked the staff where the oranges were going, but the answer was an ambiguous "I don't know". Such a response is clearly unsatisfactory. What is even more unacceptable is that Mr. Mou revealed that according to the testimony of his driver, the staff at the testing station took a basket of oranges on the spot when unloading the cargo.
The incident sparked a huge response online. Many netizens expressed their shock, believing that even if Mr. Mou's vehicle was really overloaded, the inspection station would only have the right to seize the oranges, but not the right to dispose of them privately, let alone take them for consumption. This is not only a matter of property ownership, but also a reflection of possible irregularities on the part of the staff at the testing station.
As the incident continues to ferment, the public is becoming more and more interested in the truth of this case, and at the same time, it has also questioned the behavior and system of the overrun detection station. This incident is not only about the ownership of oranges, but also about the compliance with the law and the implementation of professional ethics.
On December 6, 2023, the testing station issued an official report on the matter, but Mr. Mou did not buy the account in the report. He pointed out that on December 4, the inspection station unloaded his eight baskets of oranges, but by December 5, three and a half baskets of oranges could not be found, which did not correspond to the "two missing pieces" described in the official report.
Mr. Mou also mentioned that the oranges that were originally planned to be shipped to Changchun could no longer be shipped independently due to the reduction in quantity, which was equivalent to a total loss. In addition, he stressed that although the testing station compensated 800 yuan, this money was only the cost of the transfer vehicle and did not include the value of the oranges. Mr. Mou said that although he had previously told the person in charge of the testing station that he did not need to compensate for the loss of oranges, this did not mean that the compensation had been completedHe demanded that the people responsible for the consumption of oranges must apologize to him.
Mr. Mou's strong reaction and his desire for fair treatment have drawn sustained public attention to the incident and raised questions about the professional ethics and operational procedures of the outrun testing station. As the incident continues to unfold, the public expects a clearer and fairer outcome.
**From the Internet, if there is any infringement, contact to delete!