The strategic position of the Panama Canal.
Canals play a key role in the national strategy, saving time and effort, reducing risk and increasing revenue. The Panama Canal, located at the junction of North and South America, has greatly shortened the shipping distance between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and has become the focus of competition among many major powers, especially the United States.
Historical origins with the Spanish attempt.
The Panama Canal was originally discovered by Spain, but development plans were temporarily suspended due to technical, tidal and financial problems. In the late 18th century, Spain decided to restart the project, but the Latin American War of Independence broke out and Panama became part of the Confederacy of Gran Colombia, and the development plan was again frustrated.
French efforts with American involvement.
France became the first country to actually develop the Panama Canal. However, due to epidemic diseases and technical problems, France could not proceed smoothly. After the opening of the Suez Canal, the United States intervened in the Panama Canal, and by interfering with the transportation of goods and provoking a civil war, it finally made France give up and resell the mess to the United States.
The American plot and Panamanian independence.
The United States planned to conclude a treaty with the Colombian state, but it was refused. After instigating the Colombian Civil War, the United States forced it to compromise and give Panama independence. However, independence does not mean that the United States has no bottom line, and although Panama was sold to the United States at a low price, its sovereignty is not easy.
A bumpy journey in the struggle for sovereignty.
The U.S. struggle for sovereignty over the Panama Canal has gone through a bumpy process. Britain coveted this treasure land, but the United States escaped British interference through a strategy of canal neutrality. As the other powers faded out, the United States finally gained sovereignty. However, Panama is not content to be held hostage to the United States for long.
Panamanian revolt and international solidarity.
In order to escape the control of the United States, Panama** broke off diplomatic relations with the United States, abrogated the Canal Treaty, and won global support for the people of the whole country to resist the improper behavior of the United States. Under international pressure, the United States had to compromise, and Panama eventually regained sovereignty over the canal in 1999.
Epilogue. The battle for the Panama Canal was fraught with twists and turns, and the United States finally seized sovereignty through political means and intervention. However, Panama's resistance and international support demonstrated the resilience of a small and weak state. This history presents us with a wonderful scene of political intrigue and international games.
Commentary: The illustrious history of the Panama Canal and the international political game.
The history of the Panama Canal is a story of twists and turns and strategic battles, reflecting the geopolitical wrestling between the great powers and the struggle of small countries for their own independence in the face of great power. The article details the discovery of the canal, the Spanish attempt, the efforts of France, and the intervention of the United States, each of which is accompanied by the waves of international politics and the contest of power.
First of all, the uniqueness of the canal's geographical location makes it a focal point for great powers. The article points out the role of canals in saving time and effort, saving costs, reducing risks and increasing benefits, which has led to the competition of large countries such as Spain, France, and the United States to join the canal development race. This highlights the impact of geographical location on the destiny of the country, and also reflects the game of interests in the international political landscape.
Second, France's efforts and the involvement of the United States demonstrate the real actions and manoeuvres of international politics. France, the first country to actually develop the Panama Canal, was bogged down by epidemic disease and technical problems, and eventually bankrupted the Panama Canal Company. The United States, on the other hand, skillfully exploited France's predicament and finally seized sovereignty over the canal by instigating a civil war and half-assing American projects. This process shows the flexibility of large countries and the vulnerability of small countries in international politics.
The process of Panama's independence is also a magnificent history. The United States instigated the Colombian Civil War to force it to compromise, thus allowing Panama to gain independence. Although Panama was sold to the United States at a low price after gaining independence, the article emphasizes that this is not a sign that the United States has the final say in it, but a continuation of a conspiracy.
Panama, however, has not always been passively under the control of the United States. Under international pressure and the efforts of the Panamanian people, Panama** severed diplomatic relations with the United States, abrogated the Canal Treaty, and finally recovered sovereignty over the Canal in 1999. This demonstrates the persistence of small States in their quest for independence and dignity in the international arena and the resonance of the international community for justice and fairness.
Overall, the history of the Panama Canal is a wonderful drama in international politics. Through detailed narration and analysis, the article vividly outlines the tortuous development of this period of history and the complexity of international politics. It makes us deeply reflect on the interrelationship between states, the geopolitical game between large and small countries, and the international community's eternal quest for justice and power.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!