In cross talk performances, actors often ask the audience for applause, talking, learning, teasing, singing, stand-up, counterpart, group mouth, all kinds of tricks make people happy, and applause comes and goes.
However, as soon as the scene changes, if you still act like this, you will receive not applause, but boos. According to the ** report, for a period of time, some units have tried their best to chase after the masses to "praise" when pushing the public satisfaction survey, so that everyone has trouble.
If they follow suit, their satisfying moves are varied and clumsy and crude. In order to avoid the masses from "talking nonsense", some directly print the "standard answers" to provide comparison, and everyone can only be "satisfied" to the end;Some ask for real-name answers, and the masses can only give higher ratings in order to avoid troubleSome simply overstepped their bounds, and the cadres personally went into battle to "pretend to be the masses" and circled all the answers they wantedOthers pursue "breaking wealth and eliminating disasters", clearly marking the price and saying that they are "satisfied", and they can get a reward of 100 yuan to 300 yuan for ...... recording
"Carrots" and "big sticks" came on the field one after another, in order to let the masses take a good tone and "only play the right mark, not the cross number". can look back, even though the ratings and comments are full of flowers, how can the atmosphere of deception and pretension be covered?Some people directly punctured: "I usually don't come to the door, but every time I go to the assessment, the cadres in the town and village will come in turn." "Dissatisfaction and even incomprehension can be described as overflowing.
Satisfaction surveys are a means, not an end. Objectively speaking, the mass work itself is inextricably linked, and it is almost impossible to satisfy everyone 100 percent. This is precisely the motivation for the public satisfaction survey. Listening to the "dissatisfaction", understanding the reasons behind it, and then improving the way of working, and finally solving the urgency and sorrow, and winning the "satisfaction", this is the logic of action. It's simple, but why do some people do the opposite?
The first is "weakness of heart". Individual cadres have an untruthful work style, do not get mud on their feet, conduct research and "cross the water," do not understand what the masses are thinking, and are afraid that the masses will say something wrong, so they do everything possible to take precautionsThe second is "fear of things". Some people are not only afraid of admitting their shortcomings, but also afraid of facing the problem head-on and making it troublesome to rectify, so they refuse to "bad reviews" three times;The third is "only superiority", teaching the masses to "say good things" at every turn, in essence, in order to let the superiors "listen to good words" and add color to themselves. Under such a view of political achievements, the masses are dissatisfied and do not tighten up, and the key is that the higher authorities are satisfied.
In fact, this also reminds the relevant parties that the evaluation work and evaluation cadres cannot just stare at certain data. On the one hand, digital formalism is emerging. A grassroots cadre once gave an example, and the satisfaction rate of a job in the two places was 961% and 963%，0.The difference of 2 percentage points is weak, but after converting the scores, the gap in the assessment ranking widens rapidly, and "other work is done in vain". On the other hand, assessment is "one-size-fits-all". The questionnaire is only one but not all of the evaluation methods, and cannot replace all of them. It is necessary to extend the tentacles of research and evaluation work, and combine various means such as public reputation, professional institutions, and industry evaluation, so that the evaluation method can be three-dimensional.
Tao Li is speechless, and the next is its own. In the final analysis, satisfaction is not written on paper, but on the earth and in people's hearts. Whether the cadres do a good job or not, the eyes of the masses are clear, and their hearts are clear. Those temporary "satisfactions" are really incomprehensible. Sink down, take the expectations of the masses as the starting point, ask the people for their plans and needs, and if they have done something and done a good job, the masses will give a thumbs up.
The original title was "Satisfaction, I really can't get it" Author: He Ruo **Beijing**).