Before reading this article, your "attention" is the driving force for us to move forward, and in order to repay your support, I will update the high-quality works daily.On December 16, elevator A of Fu'an Building failed, and an old man with two children was trapped for more than half an hour. When the elevator doors finally opened, the two children burst into tears.
According to the child's grandmother, Ms. Shi, the child's grandfather rang the alarm bell in the elevator and did not get a response, so he used his mobile phone to contact her. Ms. Shi tried to call for help with the alarm bell in another elevator, but it didn't work, and after some tossing, the elevator door finally opened. 
Ms. Shi said that the elevator problem has occurred many times, and every time you take the elevator, it is worrying. She made a proposal to replace the elevator a few years ago, but nothing seems to be going on. 
Ms. Zhu, a resident, said that the elevator problem was repeatedly reported to the property and the property committee, but no clear answer was received. Therefore, the owners carried out the elevator inspection at their own expense, and the third-party inspection report recommended that the elevator be stopped and replaced. 
In addition, last year, the owners also made a roll-up banner for elevator replacement and pasted it in the corridor. At that time, the replacement cost of the two elevators was about 675,000 yuan, but at present, it has been. 
The owners have made a lot of efforts to replace the elevator, but why has it not been realized so far?This relates to the maintenance funds of the community and the public revenue. 
Ms. Chen, a resident, said that according to the public information on the Shanghai Residential Property Network, the balance of the maintenance fund account during the tenure of the previous property committee was reduced from 1.54 million yuan to 780,000 yuan at the end of 2022, with a difference of about 760,000 yuan. 
According to the Shanghai Residential Property Management Regulations, for communities with a balance of maintenance funds less than 30% of the amount raised in the first phase, they need to raise funds again. As a result, residents said they had "no money to replace the elevators". 
So the 760,000 yuan of maintenance funds were spent on **?Residents said they didn't know. The judgment shows that the current Owners' Committee has only held one general meeting of owners related to the 2019 re-election of the Owners' Committee. 
Ms. Wu, a resident, found through the Shanghai Residential Property Network that from 2013 to 2018, the public income declaration record of the community was 0, but since 2019, there has been an increase in income, about 120,000 yuan. According to the operating income statement from 2014 to 2022 provided by the property, the total amount is 1.21 million yuan, and the difference is about 1.08 million yuan. What is the whereabouts of the 1.08 million yuan?Last year, when residents asked members of the owners' committee on the owners' reception day, they said that "the money was collected by the property". 
The Property and Owners Committee also gave an ambiguous answer to the question of the unclear account. Jiang Wen, manager of Rongzheng Property, said that since he took over the work of the community in September this year, he only knew that the company's finances were being verified and would be provided to the owners. According to the "Explanation on the Public Revenue Sharing Ratio of Fu'an Building", since January 2021, the public revenue has been divided according to the ratio of 50% of the property and 50% of the property committee (owner). However, the director of the Owners Committee said that 50% of the Owners Committee (owners) also gave the property for safekeeping, which Jiang Wen said was not clear.
Although the judgment requires the Owners Committee to publicize 11 relevant materials, including invoice stubs, bank statements, tax payments, and construction contracts for special maintenance funds, residents say that many materials are still missing. Ms Poon, deputy director of the Owners' Committee, said that all the materials that could be provided to the court had been provided, but some of the materials requested were "too professional" for the Owners' Committee to provide or even hear of.
In addition, some owners have reported that the maintenance funds are passively used without the knowledge of all owners. Ms. Pan said that before using more than 10,000 yuan of maintenance funds, she had issued an inquiry form, but the owners present at the interview denied this statement. As for the whereabouts of the public revenue gap, she said she did not know, but was willing to check the accounts with the property and the owner in person until the accounts were clarified.
Liu Yiqi, a staff member of the Jiangning Road Street Urban Transportation Center, said that the current amount of replacing an elevator has not reached the red line of maintenance funds, and an elevator can be replaced first to solve the immediate problem. The results of the verification of the property accounts are expected next week, and the street will continue to build a platform to urge the property and the property committee to give a satisfactory answer to the residents as soon as possible.