In 184 AD, the Yellow Turban Rebellion broke out, which was a fatal blow to the Eastern Han Dynasty. Subsequently, the death of Emperor Ling of the Han Dynasty in 189 AD triggered a fierce struggle between the general He Jin and the eunuchs, which eventually led to Dong Zhuo's successful entry into Luoyang, the capital of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Dong Zhuo's rise to prominence in Luoyang was met with a jaw-dropping betrayal in 192 AD, when Lü Bu and Wang Yun joined forces to remove the powerful man. What was the reason for Lu Bu's betrayal of Dong Zhuo?Is there anything to do with Diao Chan?
Dong Zhuo's trust in Lu Bu in the early days was manifested in the frequent use of him as a bodyguard, showing his favor to Lu Bu. However, Dong Zhuo has a stubborn personality and often gets angry over trivial things, even threatening Lu Bu's life. How can Lu Bu be loyal in such an environment?The reason for Lu Bu's betrayal of Dong Zhuo can be preliminarily seen in Dong Zhuo's attitude towards him gradually becoming ungentle.
Lü Bu was highly regarded by Dong Zhuo for his bravery in the early days, but as Dong Zhuo usurped power, his treatment gradually faded. Dong Zhuo trusted the generals from Liangzhou the most, while Lü Bu was not reused in the crusade of the Kwantung princes, but as a cavalry commander, he needed to obey Hu Zhen, who was born in Liangzhou. This rejection made Lu Bu gradually dissatisfied with Dong Zhuo.
Although Lu Bu was brave, he did not get the reuse he deserved under Dong Zhuo. Dong Zhuo trusted the Liangzhou generals even more, causing Lü Bu to become the commander of the cavalry in front of the Kwantung coalition army, and was subject to Hu Zhen, who was born in Liangzhou. Lu Bu's dissatisfaction with this treatment, coupled with the conflict with Hu Zhen, may be one of the main reasons why Lu Bu chose to betray.
Although Dong Zhuo was still powerful at that time, he had lost the hearts of the people, especially after moving the capital to Chang'an, Dong Zhuo's influence was further weakened. Lü Bu may have seen this trend and thought that Dong Zhuo could not provide him with a better prospect. Lu Bu longs for ** Houlu and better prestige, and cooperates with Situ Wang Yun to kill Dong Zhuo, which becomes an opportunity for him to get rid of his bodyguard status.
While Lu Bu's ambitions were inflated, the cooperation with Situ Wang Yun was also crucial. Wang Yun promised Lü Bu the treatment of being an official and a knight, so that Lü Bu could get rid of Dong Zhuo's shadow and become one of the powerful ministers. In 192 AD, Lü Bu successfully assisted Wang Yun in getting rid of Dong Zhuo, was named General Fenwu, and entered the title of Marquis of Wen, and jointly took charge of the government.
Lu Bu betrayed Dong Zhuo for complex and multifaceted reasons. Although it is associated with Diao Chan in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", there is no relevant record in actual history. The main reasons for Lü Bu's betrayal include the collapse of Dong Zhuo's relationship with Lü Bu, Lü Bu's role dilemma under Dong Zhuo, the reasons why he was not reused, the expansion of Lü Bu's ambitions, and his tacit cooperation with Wang Yun. This series of factors were intertwined, which eventually led to the collapse of Dong Zhuo Group and opened a new chapter in Lu Bu's life.
In this article, the author deeply analyzes the historical background and reasons for Lu Bu's betrayal of Dong Zhuo, and presents a more realistic and three-dimensional historical picture through detailed historical research and reasonable speculation. It is worth mentioning that the article uses concise language to sort out the complex and huge historical events, so that readers can clearly understand why Lu Bu betrayed Dong Zhuo.
First of all, when explaining the collapse of the relationship between Lu Bu and Dong Zhuo, the article profoundly reveals the shortcomings of Dong Zhuo's personality. Dong Zhuo's self-serving and narrow temperament made him too decisive and rude in dealing with the contradictions with Lu Bu. This laid the groundwork for Lu Bu's betrayal, and also made the reader better understand why Lu Bu chose to leave when facing Dong Zhuo.
Secondly, to interpret the role dilemma of Lu Bu under Dong Zhuo, the article clearly points out that Lu Bu was not reused by Dong Zhuo, although he was valued for his courage in the early days, but with the change of the current situation, he failed to get more trust and appointment at the critical moment. This provided a reasonable motive for Lü Bu's dissatisfaction and betrayal, and also highlighted Dong Zhuo's partiality towards the ministers.
Third, the article's explanation of Lu Bu's inflated ambition is thought-provoking. The decline in Dong Zhuo's prestige led Lü Bu to question Dong Zhuo's leadership, believing that he could not offer a better prospect. Lu Bu longs for the best and better prestige, and the tacit cooperation with Wang Yun has become the key to achieving this goal. This provides a clearer logic for Lü Bu's decision to betray.
Finally, the article vividly presents the complexity of historical events by summarizing the main reasons for Lü Bu's betrayal. The cooperation between Lü Bu and Wang Yun was emphasized, and Wang Yun's promise of an official and a knighthood for Lü Bu became an important guarantee for Lü Bu to realize his personal ambitions. This makes the article more in-depth and detailed in explaining the behavior of historical figures, and also provides readers with a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Overall, this article not only demonstrates the author's professionalism through in-depth historical research, but also makes it easier for readers to understand and perceive the complexity of historical events through easy-to-understand text. Through the grasp of historical details, the article successfully outlines Lü Bu's psychological and behavioral motivations at a specific historical moment, so that readers can have a deeper understanding of this historical event.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!