The great contribution of the heroes of liberation.
In the long history of our country, the liberation heroes have left an eternal chapter with their indomitable will and heroic and fearless fighting spirit. Among them, the most eye-catching are the four major field armies, which regarded death as their home, won the victory with the momentum of breaking through the bamboo, and brought us a beautiful and happy life. However, for these four armies, which contributed the most to the liberation is not a question of opinion between the wise and the wise. This article will analyze the heroes of these four major field armies through the analysis of the number of enemies destroyed, the size of the army, the scale of the land liberated, and the degree of damage, and reveal the brilliance and differences among them.
The original intention of the field army.
The four field armies were not what they are today, they were under different leaders, and they had their own Xi and characteristics. First of all, the 1st Field Corps originated in the northwest, under the direction of Commander Peng, and was formed by a number of volunteers and local garrison troops. When it was first founded, it numbered only 45,000, but it faced the dual threat of bandit warlords in the northwest and the remnants of Lao Chiang's henchmen. This is a battle full of crises, but the start-up team, under the leadership of Commander Peng, successfully defeated a powerful enemy and saved the people from dire straits.
Clause. 2. The Third Field Army originated from the Central Plains and was large in number, led by Liu Shuai, Deng Gong and Li Yu respectively. These two teams demonstrated excellent tactics and strategies in battles large and small, and became the mainstay of the liberation cause. The Fourth Field Army originated in the northeast and was led by the iron-blooded tough guy ** Marshal, with a large number of people and strong combat power.
The one with the best battle loss ratio.
In the game of war, the battle loss ratio reflects the combat effectiveness of an army. The 1st Field Army, with its native experience, launched a "mushroom war" in the desert of the Northwest Plateau, and won the greatest victory at the minimum cost, sacrificing 18,000 people, with a battle loss ratio of 31%。In contrast, the Second Field Army suffered heavy losses in the campaign, especially in the Dabie Mountain area, and the difficult crossing led to a battle loss ratio of as high as 1793%。
The Third Field Army, under the command of Li Yu, successfully coped with various complex situations with the characteristics of a professional team, and finally won the 1414% of the battle losses ratio was won. The Fourth Field Army, under the leadership of the first army, through precise tactics, the battle loss ratio was only 4%, showing excellent combat capability. The stats show that both teams are adept at using tactics to minimise sacrifices, no matter what the adversity they face.
The most strategically fortified.
In the war of liberation, it was crucial to grasp the geographical location of strategic fortresses. The First Field Army and the Fourth Field Army guard the northernmost and southernmost borders of our country respectively and assume the responsibility of guarding our homeland. The First Field Army held the great northwest in the desert of the Northwest Plateau, while the Fourth Field Army swept northeast to Hainan Island and guarded the gate of our country. Both demonstrated superior military prowess in different geographical locations, ensuring the stability of strategic fortresses.
The strongest. After comparing the number of troops and strategic deployment, the Fourth Field Army stood out and was considered the most powerful team. They have a huge army, a total of 1.5 million people, advanced equipment, and the most marshals. In the battles at three key turning points, the 4th Field Army performed well, participated twice, and became the most striking team. **The Fourth Field Army led by him not only led by one million in numbers, but also was outstanding in the number of enemies destroyed and combat exploits.
Epilogue. Through an in-depth analysis of the four major field armies, we see the great contribution of each army in the war of liberation. Whether it was the struggle of the First Field Army in the northwest, the persistence of the Second Field Army and the Third Field Army in the Central Plains, or the campaign of the Fourth Field Army from the northeast to the South China Sea, each team has made immortal contributions to the cause of liberation. In the end, who contributed the most in the war of liberation?Perhaps, this is a question left to the writing of history, and we should all remember those heroic years.
This article delves into the contributions of the four major field armies in the War of Liberation, and shows the unique value of each army in a specific region and campaign through data analysis and detailed descriptions. First of all, the author provides readers with a clear historical context by introducing the background, leaders and original intentions of the establishment of the four major field armies. All this provides a solid foundation for subsequent in-depth analysis.
In the section "The Optimal Battle Loss Ratio", the author vividly presents the performance of each field army in the war through the data display of the battle loss ratio. In particular, under the leadership of General Peng, the First Field Army successfully minimized the battle loss ratio through ingenious tactics such as "mushroom warfare", showing excellent tactical response under extreme conditions. In contrast, the Second Field Army suffered relatively large losses under the pressure of the Dabie Mountain area, highlighting the important influence of the geographical environment on the battle situation.
In the section "The Best of Strategic Fortresses", the author combines the background of the liberation war with the tasks of the individual field armies, emphasizing their importance in different geographical locations. In particular, the First Field Army and the Fourth Field Army guarded the northernmost and southernmost borders respectively, which played a vital role in ***. This kind of strategic layout is fully embodied in the article, which makes people deeply feel the strategic thinking of the four major field armies in the cause of liberation.
Finally, in the "strongest" part, the Fourth Field Army was identified as the strongest team by comparing the number of troops and combat exploits. The article skillfully speaks with data, highlighting the superiority of the Fourth Field Army in terms of size and combat capability. **'s leadership and management skills have also been positively evaluated, especially his successful recruitment, which has led to the rapid growth of the team.
In general, this article shows the characteristics and contributions of the four major field armies in the War of Liberation through detailed data and vivid descriptions. Through in-depth analysis, readers can more clearly understand the dedication and dedication of the heroes in this historical period, and feel their great efforts for the cause of national liberation.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!