Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy commander issued a warning via a public channel that the U.S. Navy's USS Eisenhower carrier strike group entered the Persian Gulf on November 26, Iran** reported. Iran used drones to cross over the U.S. aircraft carrier strike group and warned U.S. aircraft carriers not to approach. After receiving the warning, the US aircraft carrier took corresponding action and let it land. This incident surprised the international community, and at the same time raised concerns about the actions of the US military.
Iran's warning actions show that they are highly vigilant about U.S. military action. By using drones to fly over aircraft carriers, Iran has expressed to the U.S. military its understanding of the U.S. military's capabilities and its ability to counter. This action by Iran is aimed at demonstrating to the world their influence and capabilities in regional affairs. The incident has sparked international concern and prompted a reassessment of the hostile relationship between the United States and Iran.
On November 27, the Houthis fired two ballistic missiles at a U.S. Burke-class destroyer, according to a U.S. ** report. The two missiles flew over the Gulf of Aden and landed in waters about 11 miles from the **. At this time, the ** name is Mason, which is part of the combat sequence of the USS Eisenhower Aircraft Carrier Strike Group, which is carrying out the mission of rescuing the hijacked "** Park" liquid cargo ship. The occurrence of this missile attack made the whole incident even more tense and dangerous.
The Houthi firing of missiles at a U.S. destroyer has drawn widespread attention from the international community. This incident has seriously threatened the US military's military operations in the Gulf of Aden region and exposed the security risks of the US military in the region. This missile attack not only poses a threat to the United States, but also has a negative impact on regional peace and stability. The actions of the Houthis have once again highlighted the factors of instability in the Middle East, and the international community needs to work together to maintain peace and security in the region.
In this tense situation, people are concerned about why the US military has responded so conservatively. First of all, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is in the midst of an "intermission" at this time, and all parties, including the United States, are trying to extend the temporary ceasefire. If the US military clashes with Iran and the Houthis, it will arouse the hostility of Arab countries and will not be conducive to the maintenance of US influence in the Middle East. Secondly, Biden, who is about to enter the ** mode, needs "good news" in various fields, and successful mediation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can promote his diplomatic achievements to the country and enhance his political image. However, Biden's conservative response also hints at difficulties in protecting his authority.
The U.S. military's choice to remain relatively conservative in its response reflects a combination of political, military, and geopolitical factors. Although the United States is a long-time ally of Israel, it needs to act more cautiously in the current political context. This conservative posture is not only to avoid arousing the resentment of Arab countries, but also to take into account its own interests in the Middle East, especially the competition with China and Russia in the region. In addition, Biden also needs to resolve the nuclear issue through negotiations with Iran and avoid further military conflict. Therefore, staying calm and cautious is an important move for the US military at present.
The current situation is not favourable for the Arab States. The recent U.S. interference in China's increased influence in the Middle East shows that Washington is wary of the emerging forces in the region. Although the United States has taken into account the sentiments of Arab countries on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, it may take a tougher stance if it goes beyond the issue. In such a situation, Arab countries need to be more vigilant, formulate their own policies and cooperate with other countries to protect their own interests.
Arab countries are wary of US interference in exchanges between China and the UAE in the fields of economy, trade, science and technology. This shows that the Arab countries are uneasy about the growing influence of external forces in the region. Arab countries need to seek the support and understanding of the international community while protecting their own interests. In the face of US intervention and the complex situation in the Middle East, Arab countries need to form a close cooperation mechanism to jointly resist the interference of external forces and formulate their own independent policies.
The article describes Iran's warning of the US aircraft carrier and the incident in which the Houthis fired missiles at the US ship. The reasons for the conservative response of the US military and the reaction of Arab countries are analyzed. Despite the current temporary ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, tensions in the Middle East remain. Arab countries need to be vigilant and develop their own policies to safeguard their interests. The United States also needs to act cautiously and take into account a combination of factors when dealing with Middle East affairs. For his part, Biden needs to find a balance between protecting his authority and safeguarding regional interests. Stability and peace are needed in the entire Middle East region, and the international community should work together to resolve the current tensions.