Changes in the environment within the system, contrasts lead to discussion and examination preparation
Since ancient times, liberal arts have been considered a relatively narrow path to employment. However, in recent years, more and more people have chosen this system. This choice has sparked widespread discussion and controversy. This article interprets the working environment and prospects of this system from different perspectives.
Institutional attractiveness.
Working within the system has always been a dream for many. Especially in the highly competitive labor market, entering the system means job security and high wages. According to statistics, about 70% of graduates in literature and history choose to sign a tripartite agreement with the system every year, which shows their yearning for work in the system.
However, entering the system does not mean that you can easily enjoy preferential treatment. Although the income level within the system is slightly higher than that of the general population, the treatment varies greatly from region to region and from position to position. The salary of some grassroots positions is only about 3,000 yuan, and there is not much room for promotion after 10 years of work. What's more, most of the positions in the system are grassroots positions, the work is hard, the responsibilities are heavy, and employees feel exhausted every day.
In recent years, more and more candidates have taken the national unified examination, and in order to enter the system, they do not hesitate to give up the job opportunities close to home and choose to take the examination in a distant place. However, this practice gradually revealed problems. Jobs in more remote areas pay less and are difficult to settle in, ultimately forcing many to leave their jobs and return home. Candidates who take the National Unified Examination are beginning to realize that entering the system is not as good as they imagined.
Hard work and systems change.
The hardships of working in the system can only be experienced by those who are involved in it. This hardship is also reflected in the changes they make before and after work. Recently, a young woman shared a comparison photo of herself after entering the system on social **, which sparked heated discussions among netizens. The comparison ** shows that she has changed from an innocent and lovely girl to a disgruntled middle-aged woman, and even has a double chin. Netizens joked that the system suddenly produced a strange radiation effect that made people different. At the same time, many people who work in the system also said that after entering the system, there are very few people who are not so young and beautiful. This is mainly because the girls on the post don't have the courage to dress up, or they are too busy with work to find time to repair.
However, many people tend to gain weight after entering the system. There are many reasons for this: some people gain weight because the food in the unit is reliable and they eat too well;Some people are too tired from work, trapped in their jobs, overworked and gain weight. Although working in a grassroots system can feel tiring, once you get through it, you will find that you look young when you reach middle age. At this time, there is no pressure of a midlife crisis, the ability to work is enhanced, and the salary is also increased. Life gradually improved, and the spirit was renewed. It is precisely because of these factors that many people are eager to work in the system, because only by working in the system can they make great progress in their lives and develop in a better direction.
The contradiction of the system.
The system is a place of contradiction. For those who have experienced social hardships, the system is a safe and comfortable working environment where they can work peacefully for the rest of their lives. However, for the younger generation of candidates, the system can trigger another kind of ambivalence. Their mindset is very different from that of their peers, and they often choose to leave after a certain period of work. These young people are not yet fully established and are full of longing for the outside world, so it is difficult to achieve their aspirations by working within the system. In addition, in recent years, due to the imbalance between revenue and expenditure, some units have cut many social programs and significantly reduced wages. This means that some jobs within the system are demanding and poorly paid, resulting in a lack of job seekers. This further illustrates that not everyone is satisfied with the work within the system, and everyone is happy.
Abstract: An analysis of work within the system shows that it has both advantages and disadvantages in terms of both economic rewards and labor pressure. It is an indisputable fact that for those who have decided to work in the system after struggle, it is an indisputable fact that working in the system can provide a stable job and a certain amount of financial security. However, for young people, entering the system means giving up some of their freedom and space for development, which can be a source of conflict.
The author believes that students who want to work in the system should try to understand the world and see what other jobs are like when they are students, so as to regulate their emotions and avoid leaving their jobs because of psychological problems. At the same time, most of the vacancies in the system in recent years have been concentrated at the grassroots level, which is also a test of students' hearts. In short, working within the system has a certain appeal, but at the same time, it is also faced with a situation of hard work and contradictions. Each person's choice within the system should be weighed and decided according to their own situation and mentality.