Title:
Trivia!The Ukrainian soldiers used "Bradley" to tease the girl, and the three Russian cars became "leaky" in seconds!
Recently, a real version of the "one-on-three" war of Ukrainian soldiers has attracted widespread attention. A Ukrainian M2A2 "Bradley" infantry fighting vehicle near Avdiivka successfully destroyed three Russian MT-LB armored personnel carriers, and the scene was unbelievable. And this military showdown is not only a technical comparison, but also a profound reflection on the situation of modern warfare.
In **, the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle skillfully uses 25mm machine guns and anti-tank missiles to destroy enemy armored teams with precision like a master dancing on the battlefield. And the ridicule on social ** is even more intense, describing the Russian armored convoy as being beaten as a "leaky basin", which is really a vivid metaphor.
This scene makes me wonder why a "Bradley" can show such strong combat effectiveness on the battlefieldWhat is it about the technology and strategy that makes this infantry fighting vehicle so unique in the world?
First of all, we need to understand the armament of the "Bradley" infantry fighting vehicle. This Ukrainian soldier's right-hand man is not only equipped with a 25mm chain cannon, but also a "Tao" anti-tank missile launcher, as well as an advanced fire control system and sighting system. Such a ** configuration makes the "Bradley" not only superior in mobility, but also comparable to the main battle tank in terms of firepower output.
In contrast, the Russian MT-LB armored personnel carrier, which was described as "leaky", is obviously at a disadvantage in terms of equipment and sighting system. It only carries a 7The small turret of the 62 mm machine gun, the sighting system is only an ordinary periscope, and it lacks the support of the fire control system. This makes it palpable when faced with an all-round opponent as well-armed as "Bradley".
However, victory or defeat on the battlefield is not only a comparison of technology and equipment. Even if the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle had a clear advantage in this engagement, in fact, it was not invincible. Threats such as anti-tank missiles, drones, tank guns, howitzers, and mines have all posed a great test to this advanced combat vehicle, resulting in heavy losses and even capture by the Russian army.
Behind this result, it can't help but trigger deeper thinking. In modern warfare, is it the advanced nature of technology and equipment that determines victory or defeat, or is it the understanding of actual combat experience and overall cognition that is the more crucial factor?
Looking at this battle from China's point of view, we can't just stop at admiring the technology and equipment. The enhancement of military strength requires the cultivation of all-round qualities, including the wisdom of commanders in decision-making, the overall ability of troops to coordinate operations, and the ability to adapt to various complex war situations.
This war also reminds us that even with top-notch equipment, we cannot ignore the prevention of various threats and the tactical level.
Adjust. The development of modern military affairs requires not only technological innovation, but also a comprehensive understanding of and the ability to respond to various elements of warfare. In this information age, intelligence gathering and agility in decision-making have a profound impact on the final outcome of the war.
Looking back at this "one-on-three" actual battle, we also have to think about the direction of China's development in the field of military technology. In the process of upgrading equipment, how to maintain attention to comprehensive military quality and how to improve the actual combat level of the advanced troops through all-round military training are all issues that must be pondered deeply in the course of modernization.
Generally speaking, this "leaky" battle is not only a comparison of military strength, but also a microcosm of the modern military war situation. In this process, we have not only seen the overwhelming advantages brought by technical equipment, but also seen the role of overall cognition and comprehensive quality that cannot be ignored. This has far-reaching implications for our understanding of modern military international relations and our understanding of the essence of war.
Therefore, as observers of military international relations, we need to pay attention not only to military technology, but also to the human factors and strategic wisdom behind the military. This "leaky" war may be able to trigger broader military thinking and help us better understand today's complex and ever-changing international military landscape.