The national public government has always been known for its comprehensiveness and fierce competition, but in recent years, there have been as many as 700,000 people who have dropped the test, a number that has aroused widespread concern. What is the reason for such a large number of dropouts?
As the main way for Chinese state organs and institutions to select staff, the nature of the national public examination is significantly different from that of the college entrance examination and graduate examination. It is not only like the college entrance examination and graduate examination, which mainly examines the ability to learn Xi and interest in scientific research, but also emphasizes the comprehensive quality of candidates.
The comprehensive quality of the app covers a wide range of contents, including but not limited to administrative skills, communication skills, teamwork, etc. In terms of administrative ability, the national examination mainly examines the candidates' ability to understand and apply national policies and regulations, as well as their ability to handle and make decisions about administrative affairs.
In terms of communication skills, the national examination attaches great importance to candidates' language skills, listening skills, and ability to communicate and collaborate with others. In terms of teamwork, the national examination emphasizes the role and role played by candidates in the team, as well as the recognition and contribution to the goals and interests of the team.
This emphasis on comprehensive quality makes the national examination a more challenging one. It not only requires candidates to have a solid knowledge base, but also requires candidates to have excellent personal qualities and good teamwork spirit.
At the same time, this also means that the national examination puts forward higher requirements for the comprehensive literacy of candidates. Candidates need to make comprehensive preparations in many aspects such as knowledge reserve, ability improvement, and experience accumulation, so as to be able to stand out in the national examination and successfully enter the work of state organs and institutions.
Although the difficulty of the civil service exam is staggering, it is still the best way for many ordinary graduates to change their lives. As a result, the number of applicants for the civil service examination each year is considerable. However, along with this phenomenon, the number of people who drop out of the test is also gradually increasing.
Relevant institutions have conducted comprehensive statistics on the recruitment data of the national public examination in the past five years. Amazingly, the data shows that the number of test dropouts was as high as 700,000 during this time period, which is an impressive number. What is the reason behind this number?
First of all, we must recognize the fierceness of public competition. In recent years, civil service positions have attracted much attention due to their relatively high salaries, relatively stable career prospects, and relatively good welfare packages. These advantages make the competition of the national public school extremely fierce every year, and candidates compete to apply for the examination, which makes the admission rate drop significantly.
Faced with this situation, some candidates may feel that they are relatively uncompetitive, so giving up the exam becomes a rational choice, avoiding the disappointment of not being able to get the desired results despite the possible effort.
Secondly, for some candidates, the abandonment may be due to thoughtful consideration of the profession itself. The nature of the work of national civil servants requires a certain degree of political awareness and public service awareness, and some candidates may have some hesitation and worries after in-depth understanding of civil servant work. Being a civil servant entails serving the community while shouldering a certain amount of political responsibility, which may not be suitable for some individuals. Therefore, they may choose to abandon the test before the test and look for a direction that is more in line with their interests and career plans.
In addition, the reason why some candidates abandon the test may be related to distrust of the examination process. The large institution and cumbersome procedures of the national examination make the examination process relatively complicatedSome candidates may have doubts about the fairness and transparency of the test, believing that opportunism and unfair tactics may affect the fairness of the test. This mistrust may motivate them to choose to abandon the test before the test to avoid possible uncertainties and risks.
Finally, the stress of life and the diversity of career choices are also one of the reasons for the phenomenon of abandonment. In recent years, the society's recognition of individual's diversified career choices has gradually increased, and many people are more willing to pursue their interests and pursue a career that is more in line with their individual values and lifestyle. In this context, some people may think that the national examination is not the only way out, and it has become a rational choice to give up the exam and look for a career opportunity that is more suitable for you.
First of all, the phenomenon of abandonment has caused a huge waste of resources. Public education requires a huge investment of resources such as manpower, material resources and venues, and a large number of candidates choose to abandon the test, which means that these resources are not fully utilized. This is a serious challenge for them, and it also requires them to think about how to use resources more efficiently and reduce waste.
Second, the phenomenon of abandonment can lead to a waste of talent. Some of the candidates who gave up the exam may be talents with excellent comprehensive qualities, but they chose to give up the exam for various reasons. This situation is a waste of resources for bringing in more high-quality talents into the public service. In order to better realize the potential of talents, it may be necessary to consider how to reduce the abandonment rate and retain more excellent candidates.
At the same time, the phenomenon of abandonment of examinations may have an impact on the overall quality of the national civil service. If some candidates with certain comprehensive qualities choose to abandon the examination, it may affect the overall quality of the future civil service. This has led to thinking about the recruitment criteria and selection mechanism of civil servants, whether it is necessary to match the job needs of talents more accurately, and how to better attract and retain high-quality talents.
Finally, the phenomenon of abandonment also reflects some institutional deficiencies, which need to be optimized and reformed. The process of public examination is cumbersome, and whether a more flexible system and more humane examination methods are needed to reduce the tendency of candidates to abandon the examination is a question worthy of in-depth study. The optimization and reform of the system will help improve the efficiency and fairness of civil service recruitment, and at the same time attract more potential candidates to participate.
The emergence of the wave of civil servants abandoning the examination has caused thinking about the entire examination system. We need to take this issue seriously and deeply analyze the reasons for abandoning the examination, so as to provide more scientific, fair and reasonable suggestions for the future civil service recruitment system. Public service is not only a competition to select talents, but also an important guarantee for the operation of social mechanisms and the promotion of public undertakings.