In Xinjin County, Linjiang Prefecture in the Ming Dynasty, Zou Jing, a poor farmer, worked day after day for a living. One day, he diligently chopped firewood, picked firewood to the city and sold it to a scholar, Lu Riqian, and harvested two cents of silver. Unexpectedly, he left the knife in the wood in a hurry, and when he returned home, he was shocked to find that it was lost. So, he hurried back to the city and found Lu Riqian, hoping to find his sword.
However, Lu Riqian not only refused to return the knife, but also made things difficult for Zou Jing in every way. Zou Jing was furious and scolded loudly mercilessly. In order to save face, Lu Riqian actually wrote a letter falsely accusing Zou Jing of speaking ill of each other and sending him to the county office.
When Wu Daning, the prefect of the county government, saw this, he made a decision without much difficulty, and ordered Zou Jing to be beaten five boards and driven out of the city. Zou Jing was bitter and angry, but he still couldn't give up the pursuit of his knife, and he returned to the door of Lu Riqian's house again and shouted.
Lu Riqian couldn't wait to ask Wu Daning to strike again, claiming that Zou Jing was insulting him on the street. Wu Daning wanted to solve the problem completely, and secretly instructed his subordinate Li Jie to achieve his goal by conspiracy.
Li Jie came to Lu Riqian's house and deceived Mrs. Lu into believing it with fabricated news. Mrs. Lu ignorantly handed over Zou Jing's firewood knife, while Li Jie returned to the county government with the knife. All this was carried out under Wu Daning's plan, and he deliberately created chaos and put Zou Jing in a difficult situation.
When Wu Daning faced Zou Jing, he pretended to severely accuse him of not knowing how to be bad. He even threatened to beat Zou Jing for another twenty boards. This made Zou Jing feel helpless, so he had to bow his head and kowtow and beg for mercy. Wu Daning finally asked Zou Jing to kowtow in front of him and apologize on the grounds of "tolerance" towards Lu Riqian, so he spared him.
The ending of this grievance shows Wu Daning's wisdom and loyalty. He not only skillfully exposed the truth through means, but also saved face for Lu Riqian in front of everyone. His remarks also reminded Lu Riqian to reform his ways and no longer fall into the quagmire of morality.
Wu Daning's three wins with one stone showed the demeanor of an honest military attaché. While upholding justice, he also showed care and education for the people. His approach has become a model for the eunuch's house, and it is worth learning from everyone'Xi.
Conclusion: Wisdom and justice, honest military attaché to treat people with sincerity.
Through this story, we see a wise and upright military attache who shows care for the people while upholding social justice. He resolved disputes with loyalty and conscience, and finally achieved the effect of three wins, which is deeply admired. Such an upright and honest military attache is undoubtedly a stabilizer of society and the embodiment of fairness and justice. Let us learn from this military attache and Xi together and strive for the prosperity and justice of society.
In this article, we see the strife between a poor farmer and a miserly scholar, as well as the wisdom and justice of an incorruptible military attaché. Through the depiction of military attache Wu Daning, this story presents a kind of insistence on justice and concern for social harmony.
First of all, the article shows the hard life of Zou Jing, a farmer at the bottom of the society. He made a living by selling firewood every day, and his livelihood was difficult. This situation depicts the gap between the rich and the poor in society during the Ming Dynasty, and makes the reader feel sympathy for Zou Jing's situation. This also provokes reflections on social fairness and justice, making the battle for justice in the story even more thought-provoking.
Second, Lu Rigan's stinginess and unreasonable behavior aroused readers' disgust at injustice. Not only did he refuse to return Zou Jing's firewood knife, but he also verbally abused the other party. This kind of bullying of vulnerable people makes people feel righteous outrage. Through Lu Riqian's negative image, the article highlights the injustices and bad behaviors that exist in society, highlighting the desire for justice.
However, what is even more eye-catching is the appearance of military attache Wu Daning. He showed wisdom and justice, and revealed the truth through clever means, so that the farmer Zou Jing could be rehabilitated. Wu Daning's behavior reflects his adherence to social fairness and justice, and at the same time, his kind reminder to Lu Riqian also shows a kind of edifying side. This attitude of focusing on education while upholding justice sets an example for people to have more positive expectations of **.
At the end of the article, Wu Daning treats Zou Jing with a tolerant attitude, showing the noble qualities of an incorruptible military attaché. He killed three birds with one stone, which not only allowed Zou Jing to be rehabilitated, but also saved face for Lu Riqian in front of everyone, and at the same time educated Lu Riqian. This approach not only shows the military attaché's wisdom, but also shows his concern for social stability and justice.
To sum up, this article shows the hardships and injustices of the people at the bottom of society through the dispute between a small farmer and a scholar, and at the same time, through the appearance of military attachés, presents the pursuit of justice and the call for social harmony. The article is thought-provoking, but it also provides readers with reflections on justice, wisdom and integrity. This kind of story, which reflects the hard life of the people at the bottom of society, and the call of the power of justice, undoubtedly gives people hope for social harmony.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!