In today's automotive market, consumers are dazzled by the rise of new energy SUVs, however, for consumers who love off-road, traditional fuel vehicles still seem to be a more reliable choice. Recently, with the best-selling Tank 300, more and more car companies have also set foot in the off-road vehicle market, among which the high-profile is the Jet Traveler. With the endorsement of Chery's strong brand, plus 13With an entry price of 990,000 yuan, this car has indeed aroused a lot of interest, especially when the starting price of the Tank 300 reaches 19980,000 hours.
However, there is a clear difference between buying an off-road vehicle and buying a family SUV, and the price is by no means the only criterion for measuring the product, but the product power is the decisive factor. The following will be a look at two cars that are currently in the market with a lot of attention - 21680,000 tanks 300 and 16990,000 short-distance travelers compared sales, configuration, etc., ** the performance of these two cars in Tibet off-road.
First of all, in terms of exterior dimensions, the difference between the two cars is minimal, and the difference in length and wheelbase is negligible. However, it is worth noting that the modification of the Tank 300 is relatively mature and presents a more superior visual effect. In addition, due to the relatively short time on the market of the Jet Traveler, there are currently relatively few mature cases of modifications, which makes the tank 300 more attractive in terms of appearance.
In addition to the exterior dimensions, the approach and departure angles of the off-road vehicle are also important factors to consider. The Tank 300 is better in this regard, with an approach and departure angles of 33 and 34 degrees, respectively, while the Jet Traveler is relatively weak, with an approach and departure angles of 28 degrees. In short, the Tank 300 has a more pronounced advantage in off-road performance, while the Jet Traveler is closer to the average urban SUV.
In terms of interior design, both cars have their own characteristics. Due to the ** factor, the materials used in the tank 300 are slightly more generous, and at the same time have a more off-road atmosphere. However, the Jet Traveler is superior in terms of equipment, especially in terms of safety features, such as active braking, DOW door opening warning, front and rear collision warning, etc. This makes the Jet Traveler competitive in the urban SUV category.
Next, we're going to focus on chassis and performance, which are key aspects that determine the strength of off-road vehicles. Although both cars are equipped with 20T power, but the Tank 300 has a maximum power of 167kW and a maximum torque of 387N·m, while the Jet Traveler has a maximum power of up to 187kW and a maximum torque of 390N·m, which is not much different. In terms of transmission, the Tank 300 uses an 8-speed automatic transmission, while the Jet Traveler opts for a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. The choice of this will have a direct impact on the driver's perception of the driving experience of the vehicle and needs to be weighed according to personal preferences.
However, the real dry goods are in the chassis and performance. Although both cars are equipped with all-wheel drive, there are certain differences in the specific configuration. The Tank 300 uses time-sharing four-wheel drive, with a front double wishbone and a rear multi-link suspension, while the Jet Traveler opts for a time-sharing four-wheel drive with a front MacPherson rear multi-link suspension. This difference is reflected not only in off-road performance, but also in cost.
In addition, the Tank 300 is also equipped with functions such as front and rear axle differential locks, low-speed four-wheel drive, and tank cornering, while the Jet Traveler only has rear axle differential locks. This gives the Tank 300 a certain advantage in cross-country performance. In summary, 21680,000 tanks 300 and 16The 990,000 short-distance travelers have their own merits, and choosing which one is more suitable for off-road in Tibet needs to be weighed according to personal preferences and car needs.
If off-road performance is a top priority, the Tank 300 may be more suitable. And if you are more sensitive to configuration and **, and do not have high requirements for off-road performance, the short-distance traveler is also a good choice. The final choice should be based on individual vehicle needs, taking into account the vehicle's appearance, interior, configuration, power and off-road performance.