In recent years, civil service positions and the establishment of public institutions have attracted much attention, mainly because they offer a relatively high degree of job security, as well as attractive salaries and comprehensive benefits.
In recent years, the number of university graduates has been increasing, and many graduates are affected by the job market and find it difficult to find suitable jobs. Even if some people are lucky enough to be hired by the private sector, they are always at risk of losing their jobs due to the closure of their businesses.
Therefore, after facing the grim reality of the job market, many college students have chosen to apply for public institutions or civil service positions. Although the salary of some institutions is not very lucrative, with the accumulation of work experience, the title of employees will gradually improve.
With the promotion of professional titles, various benefits such as basic salary and performance bonuses will also increase accordingly, which has become the main motivation for many students to be admitted to public institutions. However, if an employee's salary and pension are decoupled from those of the civil service, then candidates may need to reconsider when choosing to apply for the exam.
The question of whether pensions will be "untied" from job titles and whether they will be implemented in 2025 has attracted much attention. Generally speaking, there is a certain correlation between the pension of the position in the system and the job title. The higher the title, the higher the pension of the employee after retirement, and this trend applies not only to teachers, but also to civil servants. As the rank of civil servant increases, the monthly income and pension will increase accordingly.
Unlike civil service positions, there is relatively little room for advancement in teaching positions. In order to improve their salary and pension level, teachers can only do so by applying for professional titles. Only by obtaining a higher job title can the pension be more generous, and the happiness index of old age can also be higher.
This is also the reason why many teachers, despite the fierce competition, are still seriously preparing for the selection of professional titles. However, there are rumors that after 2025, pensions will be decoupled from "job titles".
When the teachers heard the news, they received mixed reviews. Teachers with relatively low titles rejoice, because when their titles are untied to their pensions, they don't have to worry about the limited number of places, they just need to put their heart and soul into their work.
On the contrary, those teachers with senior titles are disappointed, and they put in a lot of effort to get the title only to end up losing their competitive advantage, which is dissatisfying.
These teachers should not think that their efforts are in vain, because when working on the post, the higher the title, the corresponding increase in the basic salary, and the senior title is still their goal.
Surprisingly, the group of civil servants, who are often compared to teaching positions, did not have much psychological fluctuation in response to this change. Some civil servants said that the untying of titles and pensions was mainly for teachers, while civil servants were more focused on promotion through rank and rank.
Therefore, although both teachers and civil servants are considered stable careers, there is still a considerable gap between the two in terms of promotions, salaries, pensions, etc.
For the majority of teachers, if the teaching title can really be "untied" from the pension, what advantages will it bring?First of all, the number of places for teacher titles is limited, and the competition is fierce, and some schools only have a very small number of places a year, and the situation is quite grim. In addition, the threshold for the selection of teacher titles is high, not only to have various certificates, but also to ensure that the class has a high promotion rate, so many teachers are actively preparing for the competition every year, but few succeed in the end.
This is a bit of a blow to teachers' motivation and self-confidence, and it can also affect the way they teach. Therefore, if the link between the teacher's title and the pension is removed, teachers will not have to go to great lengths to obtain their titles, so that they can concentrate on teaching, which is good news.
In addition, it also contributes to the stability of the teaching profession. Many students who choose to teach are not only concerned about the income level of the teacher, but also value the stability of the teaching profession and a considerable pension.
If the title and pension can be untied, it means that most teachers can get a relatively considerable pension after retirement, which further improves the stability of the teaching profession, and the number of students who devote themselves to China's education is also expected to increase in the future.
In general, in recent years, in order to promote the better development of society, the relevant departments have issued a number of notices and plans, aiming to improve the stability of all walks of life, attract more students to apply for the examination, and constantly improve the rules and regulations within the system to promote the progress of different positions.
Although there is some controversy in the teaching profession, overall, it is a glorious career with a relatively high benefits package.
Today's topic: Do you support the unbundling of job titles and pensions?