Recently, a lawsuit against Xinhua Dictionary has caused heated discussions on the Internet. ** Netizens named Qian Yi and Liu Zhencheng said they were officially suing Xinhua Dictionary. The official has already responded to the questions mentioned in **. So some people think that they are grandstanding, using the Internet to promote and shake the cultural foundation as a gimmick to achieve the purpose of attracting fans and making money, and the real identity of the woman Qian Yi in ** was also used by netizens**.
* They proposed that there are inappropriate words in the Xinhua dictionary such as "**sex", "a pistol pinned to the waist", and "the child has become a burden when he is young", as well as the interpretation of "倭" in ancient times, and the original definitions of "倭寇" and "Japan's historical crimes" have been deleted. They said that they had sent seven sets of materials to the Yuhang District People's Court in Hangzhou.
Seeing this, many netizens who don't know the truth applauded, because the "poisonous textbook" incident that was popular all over the Internet not long ago may not have extinguished the anger in people's hearts.
Just like a stress reaction, this lawsuit against Xinhua Dictionary is just one stone that stirs up a thousand waves. The patriotic feelings and sense of morality in the hearts of netizens were immediately ignited.
However, careful netizens found that the problems listed in the prosecution of Xinhua Dictionary have already been officially responded.
The "**sex", "a pistol pinned to the waist", and "the child has become a burden" are all sentences, that is, everyday words in life. We do have this kind of expression in our daily life, but it is only a derogatory term.
Both derogatory and positive terms should be included in the dictionary. Moreover, there are some words that are derogatory themselves, so they are not included in the Xinhua dictionary. The culture of Chinese characters is broad and profound, with a history of origin, and most of the words have been used since ancient times, and they cannot be abandoned because of the subjective thoughts of some people when compiling the content of the dictionary.
*A ** is posted in the center, indicating that the interpretation of "倭" in the new version of the Xinhua dictionary was called Japan in ancient times, and the original definitions of "倭寇" and "Japan's historical crimes" have been deleted.
As for the explanation of the word "倭寇", "China Publishing and Marketing Weekly" WeChat *** has already introduced in an article published on June 27, 2023: "Xinhua Dictionary" focuses on receiving words. Since the 50s of the 20th century, the word "倭寇" has not been included in all editions under the word "倭", so there is no new version to delete it. The Modern Chinese Dictionary and the Xinhua Dictionary have always included the word "倭寇" in various editions.
The rumors are self-defeating, and I don't know what netizens who are in the dark and waving their flags think when they see this.
Some netizens found out the true identity of Qian Yi, a woman in **.
Qian Yiyi, known as Qian Manqiu, is a former associate professor at Changsha Medical College. However, on the official website of Changsha Medical College, two statements were issued on August 17, 2022 and July 28, 2023. said that Qian Yi (real name Qian Manqiu) published false information through the Internet, damaging the reputation of the school.
The Hunan Provincial Department of Education, on May 5, 2023, issued an announcement on the loss of Qian Manqiu's teacher qualifications: According to Article 14 of the "Teachers Law of the People's Republic of China", the loss of Qian Manqiu's teacher qualifications is now announced to the public.
Loss of "teacher qualifications", such a term is used on Qian Manqiu. Friends who are familiar with the Teachers Act should know what this means.
Qian Yi used the title of associate professor of Changsha Medical College to publish false information, which caused the reputation of Changsha Medical College to be damaged, and was clearly demarcated by the original unit's two statements, and was announced by the Education Bureau to "lose" his teaching qualifications. Such a person himself lacks credibility, except for using the Internet to promote and shake the cultural foundation as a gimmick to achieve the purpose of sensationalism and attracting fans to make money, what else can he do for?