U.S. Department of DefenseDeputy MinisterCatherineHicks' clever plan to deal with China is to have American companies compete with China for mass manufacturing capacity. However, this plan failed to hit the nail on the head. On the one hand, American companies are not willing to bear the cost of building expensive factories, and on the other hand, China's manufacturing industry enjoys a strong position in the international community, especially because the huge consumption brought by China's huge domestic market makes it impossible to compare with the American market. In addition, the United States has also failed to contain China's semiconductor industry, but has affected its own high-end chip production capacity. Although China is temporarily unable to obtain the chips that are "just needed", itsTechnologyDevelopment continues. At the same time, China'sChainIt is also more comprehensive than in the United States. Therefore, the United States has to compete with China in terms of manufacturing power, just as a clever woman does not have rice to cook deliciously. Overall, Hicks' plan is just talk, and if its companies are allowed to take action, it will weaken the momentum of the entire industry.
U.S. Department of DefenseThe plan is only theoretical, and cannot stop China's progress. As an old Chinese saying goes, "If you are not in government, you will not seek your position".U.S. Department of DefenseIt is better not to interfere in the market economy beyond its authority. Getting companies to follow this plan would undoubtedly deal a serious blow to the entire industry. It is worth mentioning that previously,U.S. Department of DefenseAttempts to secure funding from Congress were unsuccessful, and after a pause, they were targetedTechnologyEnterprises, hoping that they will be the first to develop and attack. It seems that American politicians are not only naïve about China, but also naïve about their own people. However, if AmericanTechnologyThe company can really cope with the battle, and we are willing to continue to wait and see. On the surface, this kind of competitive game is more about manufacturing power, and it's more popular, isn't it just working harder than anyone?At present, I have not found the existence of working harder than the Chinese, after all, Notre Dame Cathedral is linked to "Made in China".
For four years, the United States has tried to slow China down, but it has not been able to stop China's advance. China's manufacturing power is not only due to its size, but also because it creates strong market demand. The rise of China's manufacturing industry is not accidental, it is driven by consumer demand in the Chinese market. U.S. Department of CommerceTrying to curb China's semiconductor industry, but why can't it succeed?Could it be that there are really people in the United States who have ill intentions?If so, whyHuaweiCan also be sanctioned for four years?Obviously, the concerns of the United States are not strong enough and are pure nonsense. However, the practice of the past four years has proved that the United States has found China's pain points, but it has also misestimated its own pain points. Raimondo may be able to stop the flow of the latest chips to the Chinese market, but without the Chinese market, the high-end chips in the United States will lose the momentum to produce them. This is why the American chip giants are reluctant to give up the Chinese market and do business with China even if it is a customized product. In contrast, China did not get the chips it needed, butTechnologyDevelopment continues, the Chinese are not limited to the chips and brains in their hands, they continue to work hard, but the time is slightly delayed. Unless AmericanTechnologyNot built by intelligence. Four years have proven that the United States can slow China down, but it will never let China stop. In addition, the Chinese oneChainIt is also more comprehensive than in the United States. Therefore, if the United States wants to compete with China for manufacturing power, it must not only fight for technological level, but also look at comprehensive strength and market demand. Otherwise, the United States will only be painting bread to satisfy its hunger, but I am afraid that it will be difficult for the United States to settle the face of being the world's number one.
Against the backdrop of the current tensions between China and the United States, the idea of the United States competing with China to create power is more of a political statement. AlthoughU.S. Department of DefenseTrying to find China's pain points, but ignoring important factors beyond manufacturing power. The reason why China's manufacturing industry is strong is not only because of the large scale of production capacity, but also because of the strong demand of the Chinese market. The drive of market demand is the secret of the rapid rise of China's manufacturing industry. At the same time, China'sTechnologyDevelopment andChainThe layout is also constantly improving, making it close to invincible in terms of manufacturing power. Therefore, the U.S. attempt to compete with China for power is more of an ideological statement than a practical measure. The competition between the two sides is not limited to the competition of manufacturing power, but also involves the wrestling of comprehensive strength and market demand. In any case, the Chinese have always adhered to the spirit of hard work and innovation, and will never stop moving forward no matter what difficulties they encounter. As far as the United States is concerned, in order to truly compete with China, it needs to fundamentally think about and adjust its own development model and market demand, rather than just talking on paper. Only in this way can we engage in real competition with China and strive for more opportunities and development space.