Title: Persian Gulf Contest: The U.S. military "instigated" Iran's domineering, and the truth behind it is staggering!
A few days ago, a geopolitical contest made waves in the Persian Gulf. The US aircraft carrier "Eisenhower," like a sneaky ghost, quietly slipped into this geopolitical focal point. As soon as Iran was alert, it immediately pointed angrily, and a tough warning came. However, what is surprising is that the US military seems to be particularly "cowardly" this time - it slips away as soon as it slips away.
This can't help but make people wonder, when did the US aircraft carriers start to "coax" themselves?What kind of turbulence is hidden in this?We go back to the Persian Gulf, a battleground for soldiers. Geographically, the Persian Gulf is located between the Iranian Plateau and the Arabian Peninsula, and is a bay in the Arabian Sea that deepens into the Asian continent. This sea area is not only rich in precious resources such as oil and natural gas, but also a transportation fortress for many countries, playing an irreplaceable strategic role in the Middle East.
Because of this geographical location and geopolitics, the Persian Gulf has become the nerve center of security and stability in the Middle East. Neighboring powers as well as regional powers regard the Persian Gulf as one of the focal points of confrontation and contention. Especially for the United States, the "coveting" of the Persian Gulf is becoming more and more obvious. In this area, US aircraft carriers frequently carry out so-called "freedom of navigation," and with the deterioration of the regional situation, the appearance of the "Eisenhower" aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf this time obviously contains a deeper strategic consideration.
An Iranian commander made strong statements saying that the presence of the USS Eisenhower did not help stabilize the situation, but rather created tension and unease. He stressed that Middle Eastern countries have the ability to maintain regional security and do not need interference from foreign countries, still less do they need the United States to point fingers here. The rhetoric revealed Iran's unease with the presence of U.S. troops in the Persian Gulf and underscored regional concerns about foreign military involvement.
Iran's response was indeed unusual. When the whereabouts of the USS Eisenhower were detected, the Iranian army was not afraid of power and quickly dispatched drones to conduct reconnaissance, flew over the US aircraft carrier strike group, and demanded that it immediately take a carrier-based aircraft. However, it is surprising that the US military actually complied, without saying much, and everything seemed somewhat "fresh".
The USS Eisenhower, as the second ship of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier of the US Navy, is not only a multi-purpose large nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, but also the second largest combat ship in the world. It is one of the core forces of the US Navy's ocean-going battle group, and it has the capability of carrying combat aircraft, ships, and submarines for different purposes to carry out all-round strikes on land, sea, and air. In addition, the aircraft carrier has its own air defense system, which should be more than enough to deal with Iranian UAVs. However, this time, the "obedient" performance of the US military is full of doubts. This news, issued by Iran**, has attracted widespread attention and has also sparked various speculations internationally.
Perhaps this is a way for Iran to build momentum for itself, emphasizing its deterrence and firmness. However, if it is true that Iran has argued, at least two signals can be read from it. First of all, the USS Eisenhower's activities in the waters of the Persian Gulf still pose a certain threat and fear to the Iranian armed forces. Second, the current global situation is complex, and the United States plays an important role on both fronts of Russia, Ukraine, and Palestine and Israel.
In any case, it must be admitted that Iran is no match for the United States in terms of hard power alone. A U.S. aircraft carrier strike group is enough to rival the entire Iranian Navy, and if a conflict breaks out in the Persian Gulf, Iran may be difficult to parry. But as the saying goes, "a strong dragon can't overpower the head snake", although the US aircraft carrier strike group is powerful, it is on the chassis of Iran after all, and in the event of a conflict, the US military.
In this contest in the Persian Gulf, the US military's "instigation" move has attracted widespread attention, especially from the perspective of the Chinese, which seems to have another layer of drama. The US aircraft carrier "Eisenhower" broke into the Persian Gulf, and Iran roared angrily, but the US military slipped away like a cat with its tail shut. This makes one wonder, what's going on?Why did the U.S. military suddenly "instigate"?
First of all, it is important to understand that the Persian Gulf is not a strange place for China. As a country rich in oil, we have always had a special interest in this area. The fact that the US military is flexing its military might here naturally arouses our interest. And the "instigating" reaction of the US military this time is really ridiculous. Could it be that the U.S. military suddenly figured out that it was not a smart choice to go wild in this sea area?
Some people may say that this is for the sake of the interests of the country and to avoid unnecessary conflicts. But from the perspective of the Chinese, I can't help but sigh that this is really the finishing touch. The US military played with fire in the Persian Gulf, but chose to "coax" a little at a critical moment, which cannot help but remind people of the old saying, "the wind makes the rudder"!
Of course, we also need to be aware of the complexity of the global situation. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not been resolved, and the Palestinian-Israeli contradictions have intensified. Both of these battlefields are inseparable from the support of the United States, so the American military is indeed incapable of separating itself and may indeed be reluctant to add another war in the Persian Gulf. Of course, this is also one of the reasons for the "instigation" of the US military.
However, returning to our own emotions and perspectives, the performance of the US military this time is really quite entertaining. The guys who claim to be the "world police" did not expect that one day they would choose to "coax". At this time, Iran's tough response is like a resounding slap in the face to the US military and a big show for the whole world.
What's even more interesting is that Iran also showed its new ** at this time, receiving Russian Su-35 fighters, Mi-28 Attack*** and Yak-130 combat trainers. This caught the US military by some surprise and also made the Chinese see something interesting. After all, we are also constantly developing our national defense capabilities, and although we do not like to engage in "freedom of navigation" overseas like the US military, we must always be vigilant.
In general, this dispute between "instigation" and "domineering" in the Persian Gulf has made the Chinese watch it with relish on the sidelines. Perhaps this is just a geopolitical episode, but it also gives us some enlightenment. In this eventful season, it may be more important to remain calm and rational and see the situation clearly than to make bold statements for a while. Just like this Persian Gulf contest, whether it is "cowardice" or "domineering", there is a deep meaning behind it. Perhaps, this is also a reminder of our country's better position in international affairs.