These three mobile phones are similarly positioned, and the selling points are almost the same, and they are all offline machines that focus on appearance and texture at this price.
* In the lower market, these three mobile phones are also real competitors, of course, the configuration is relatively similar, for example: they are all sub-flagship performance chips +15K high-quality screen + outsole main camera + telephoto lens + close to 100 watts of fast charging, on the whole, it is basically a light flagship level, and there are no particularly obvious shortcomings.
The least recommended thing for this person is oppo reno11pro, the shortcomings of this mobile phone are the most obvious: 1. Snapdragon 8+ performance, although it is not bad until now. But it is indeed a notch behind vivo's Dimensity 9200+ and Honor's Snapdragon 8gen2.
2. Endurance. The 4800 mAh battery is 200 mAh less than vivo and honor, and the battery life will theoretically be much worse.
As for vivo S18Pro and Honor 100Pro, I personally think that you can choose according to your preferences.
The advantages of the vivo S18 Pro are clear:1. It is the thinnest and lightest of the three mobile phones, and the design is more orthodox and stable than the other two. 2. The spring performance of Dimensity 9200+ is also the strongest. 3. There is a fill light in the front and a ring flash in the rear, which will be better to take pictures when the flash is on, which is also the key part of vivo propaganda portrait photography.
Of course, the disadvantages can also be seen: 1. The energy consumption of the chip under heavy load will be relatively high. 2. A single speaker is indeed a bit unreasonable. 3. The quality of the telephoto lens is the worst among the three mobile phones, and of course the gap is very small.
The advantages of the Honor 100Pro are:1. The screen strategy is more aggressive, 3840Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, the best eye protection screen at present. The other two phones also have good screen eye protection. 2. More 66W wireless fast charging and independent communication chips.
The disadvantage is that the front two lenses are really not good-looking, and the design of this back cover module needs to be adapted.
Take a look at the detailed parameter configuration comparison:
Probably the comparison of these three mobile phones is like this,Aside from the performance,These three mobile phones are actually quite different,Especially in the image,This year's mid-range mobile phones are indeed relatively complete,Telephoto is all complete,There is also a large bottom main camera,As long as each brand is willing to decentralize the algorithm optimization of flagship mobile phones,Then the upper limit of the photo level will be very high。
In my personal opinion, it is to choose between glory and vivo, after all, the stronger the performance, the better.
Digital Goodies Awards