Since the beginning of this year, the market supervision departments at all levels in our district have carried out special actions against unfair competition "protection" law enforcement closely around the fields of people's livelihood, medicine and Internet platforms, and severely cracked down on illegal acts of unfair competition such as counterfeiting and confusion and false publicity. On December 15, the Autonomous Region's Department of Market Regulation announced seven typical cases of anti-unfair competition law enforcement.
Case 1: Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the false propaganda case of Ningxia Runxiang Real Estate Development.
The law enforcement officers of the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau found that in order to achieve the purpose of promoting the sales of commercial housing, the sales company was required to make a "small courtyard on the first floor and the owner has the right to use the small courtyard" to the buyers during the pre-sale, which was actually the planning and design of green plants, and the owner did not have the right to use. According to Article 20 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, in June this year, the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 300,000 yuan.
Case 2: Yinchuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with Zhuoheng (Ningxia) Network Technology *** case of defaming the reputation of competitors' goods.
According to the big data intelligent supervision service system, the law enforcement officers of the Yinchuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau conducted electronic data remote inspection and evidence collection on the **page opened by Zhuoheng (Ningxia) Network Technology on the Tmall platform. The party has the truth on the **sales product page of "Strange Things Nourishing and Health ***", do you really understand?90% of the merchants on the market sell 'fake wolfberry puree', and do you dare to drink 'wolfberry wins' containing pigments and flavors?and comparative selection, but the parties are unable to provide corroborating materials for the above contents. This behavior violated Article 11 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, and there was an illegal act of fabricating and disseminating false information about the false comparison of the competitor's goods, and damaging the business reputation and product reputation of the competitor. In accordance with Article 23 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, the Yinchuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan.
Case 3: Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the false propaganda case of the fool's hot pot restaurant in Litong District, Wuzhong City.
In February this year, the law enforcement officers of the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau found in the inspection of the fool's hot pot restaurant in Litong District, Wuzhong City, that the menu of the hot pot restaurant used "special dishes: 56 yuan of Yanchitan mutton, the treasure of the town store, the ingredients of the Yanchitan sheep state banquet, the magical 37 degrees north latitude geographical and natural environment is special, and the special sheep breed Yanchitan sheep is bred". After investigation, the mutton actually sold by the store was not produced in Yanchi County, Ningxia. His conduct violated Article 8 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, and constituted false or misleading commercial promotion, deception and misleading consumers. According to Article 20 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 50,000 yuan.
Case 4: Guyuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the false propaganda case of Guyuan Liupanshan Hospital.
In August this year, the law enforcement officers of the Guyuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau found that Guyuan Liupanshan Hospital hung the "Guyuan Public Security Bureau Yuanzhou District Bureau Forensic Outpatient Designated Hospital", "World Medical and Health Council Cavity Intervention System", "2013 China Hospital Management International Summit and Excellence Award Map" and "2013 Semiconductor Laser ** Instrument won the "Development and Progress Award" at the "International Scientific Instrument Development Annual Conference" on the wall of the corridor of its business premises and other plaques for publicity. After investigation, the content of the hanging propaganda plaque did not match the actual situation, and the parties could not provide relevant materials to prove their authenticity, and did not receive relevant honors. The conduct of the parties violated Article 8 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, and constituted an illegal act of false or misleading commercial publicity. In accordance with Article 21 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, the Guyuan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and fined 20,000 yuan.
Case 5: Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the illegal prize sales of Hengshide jewelry counters in Litong District, Wuzhong City.
In January this year, the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau found that the supermarket Hengshide jewelry counter carried out a prize-winning activity by issuing free gift coupons to consumers at the exit of the supermarket. The parties did not give a detailed description of the participation in the prize sales activities, the type of awards, the number or the winning rate, the amount of the prize or the value of the prize, etc., which violated Article 10 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, and according to Article 22 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, the Wuzhong Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the party to stop the illegal act in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 050,000 yuan.
Case 6: Haiyuan County Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the commercial bribery case of Ningxia Qimei ** chain.
In the bidding process of the food procurement project, in order to obtain the competitive advantage of winning the bid, Ningxia Qimei ** Chain bribed the staff of the tenderer by means of property and other means, and successfully won the bid. His conduct violated Article 7, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, and constituted an act of unfair competition by bribing the staff of the counterparty to the transaction with property in order to seek transaction opportunities or competitive advantages. In accordance with Article 21 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, in March this year, the Haiyuan County Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 50,000 yuan.
Case 7: Zhongwei Municipal Market Supervision Bureau investigated and dealt with the case of confusion of the trademark logo of Zhongwei People's Shopping Mall Co., Ltd.
In March this year, the law enforcement officers of the Zhongwei Municipal Market Supervision Bureau conducted an on-site inspection of Zhongwei People's Shopping Mall Co., Ltd. according to the report clues. After investigation, the use of the words, graphics, letters and combinations of the trademark "Woodpecker**" in the business premises was enough to mislead consumers into believing that they were selling clothing goods that had been recognized by the State Trademark Office as a well-known trademark "Woodpecker" in China in 2005. The act of marking the word "woodpecker**" on the business premises caused confusion among the general public that the commodity had a specific connection with the "woodpecker" clothing. His conduct violated Article 6 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted an illegal act of confusion of commercial marks. In accordance with Article 18 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, the Zhongwei Municipal Market Supervision Bureau ordered the parties to stop the illegal acts in accordance with the law and imposed a fine of 050,000 yuan.
*: Ningxia client.