The issue of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia has always been in the spotlight. A negotiation in March of this year made great progress, but was ultimately disrupted by the United States and the United Kingdom. Now, as the situation has changed, the two sides have reopened negotiations, and Russia has put forward two key conditions: the West stops deliveries**, and Ukraine accepts the new territorial reality. These two conditions mean that the achievement of a long-term peace is likely to become more complicated. In this geopolitical game, the interests of both sides are intertwined, and the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis originated from the 2014 Ukraine upheaval, in which the United States and Europe played a role that cannot be ignored. What kind of entanglement of interests and power struggle are hidden behind this game?How can we fundamentally solve the Ukraine problem and achieve lasting peace in the region?Let's dive into this issue. The issue of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia has always been in the spotlight. A negotiation in March of this year made great progress, but was ultimately disrupted by the United States and the United Kingdom. Now, as the situation has changed, the two sides have reopened negotiations, and Russia has put forward two key conditions: the West stops deliveries**, and Ukraine accepts the new territorial reality.
These two conditions mean that the achievement of a long-term peace is likely to become more complicated. In this geopolitical game, the interests of both sides are intertwined, and the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis originated from the 2014 Ukraine upheaval, in which the United States and Europe played a role that cannot be ignored. The changes in Ukraine in 2014 became the fuse for the outbreak of the Ukrainian crisis. The United States and Europe played an important role in this, they messed up Ukraine and replaced it with a pro-Western **, provoking the Crimean crisis and the Donbass crisis. The occurrence of this series of events laid the foreshadowing of the Ukrainian crisis. And now in the negotiations, Russia is demanding that the West stop sending ** to Ukraine, and that Ukraine accept the new territorial reality. These two conditions not only represent an exchange of interests between the two sides, but also the key to long-term peace in the region. The complexity of the Ukraine issue is reflected not only in the geopolitical game, but also in the territorial and security claims of both sides. The crisis in Ukraine began as a political shift in Ukraine, and then turned into a game of regional security and territorial issues. Ukraine's status as a neutral state is in question, and the competition for influence between Russia and the West is intensifying.
However, regional peace is of paramount importance to Ukraine and Russia, and how to find a way to achieve long-term regional peace while safeguarding their respective interests has become a key issue for both sides. In the current negotiations, Russia has emphasized the importance of two conditions, which also means that the two sides need to have more in-depth communication and consultation on these two issues before reaching an agreement. And for long-term peace, the realization of these two conditions can be very difficult. For the West, the cessation of deliveries to Ukraine could harm their influence and interests in Ukraine;For Ukraine, the acceptance of the new territorial realities may involve issues of national sovereignty and territorial integrity. How to find a balance between these seemingly contradictory interests has become the difficulty of the current negotiations. However, the settlement of the Ukraine issue requires not only compromise and compromise between the two sides, but also the broad participation and support of the international community. In the current international situation, the geopolitical game is no longer a one-man affair, but requires the joint efforts of many parties, and the contradictions and differences between Russia and the West also need to be coordinated and mediated by the international community.
Only with the broad participation and support of the international community can the settlement of the Ukrainian issue embark on the path of sustainable peace. In general, the issue of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia touches on the key to long-term peace in the region, and in the negotiations, the two sides need to communicate and negotiate more deeply on the cessation of deliveries to Ukraine** and Ukraine's acceptance of new territorial realities. The settlement of the Ukraine issue requires compromise and compromise on both sides, as well as the broad participation and support of the international community. Only with such joint efforts can there be real peace and stability in Ukraine. The United States has been supporting the militarization of Ukraine, which led to Ukraine becoming a military power, and then a new war broke out. This seems to be an elaborate two-step plan: first, to change the sky in Ukraine, to bury the hidden dangers of territorial disputes, and then to arm Ukraine to detonate territorial disputes. Russia now needs to avoid not only the current situation, but also the possible third and fourth steps in the future. If the territorial dispute persists, Russian-Ukrainian relations will enter a war cycle and will have to be fought every few years, which is unacceptable to Russia. (Russia and Ukraine have held peace talks in Belarus).
Demilitarization has always been a goal of Russia, and it has not given up. The two conditions mentioned by Zakharova are not the only ones, but they are crucial for Russia. In particular, demilitarization, which is related to whether there will be another war between Russia and Ukraine in the future. Now, it is very necessary to make some contacts, even if it is not possible to sit down and negotiate for the time being, to point the way to actions on the battlefield in order to avoid greater losses.