5 colleges and universities announced that they could not admit certain types of candidates, and the

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

5 colleges and universities announced that they could not admit certain types of candidates, and the expansion of the blacklist attracted social attention!

Why do universities blacklist certain types of applicants?

Five colleges and universities, Beijing Institute of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Air Force Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, and Army Military Medical University, will stop recruiting certain types of candidates. The reason why these universities have taken this measure is to maintain the fairness of the college entrance examination.

First, these higher education institutions want to avoid wasting educational resources. Some former students who are already eligible for university but choose to repeat their studies in an attempt to get into the institution of their choice is considered a waste of resources because they could have allocated resources to other students who are eligible for admission. The blacklisting of such candidates in higher education institutions aims to curb such behavior and ensure the rational allocation of resources.

Secondly, restricting the repetition of previous students is also to maintain the fairness of the college entrance examination. If former students are allowed to repeat, they have already been admitted in the previous year's college entrance examination, and if they decide to repeat again, they will preempt the places of other candidates, creating an unfair situation. Universities are aware of this phenomenon and have taken steps to limit the admission of former students in order to ensure the fairness of the gaokao.

Why do these universities restrict alumni?

When it comes to explaining the reasons why universities restrict applications from former students, we can see several reasons.

First of all, colleges and universities should really select the right students. For 985 colleges and military schools, the comprehensive quality of students is very important. They not only look at the student's grades, but also look at the student's performance in interviews, physical fitness tests, physical examinations, political examinations, etc. Former students have been selected by the target university in the previous year, and have not undergone relevant tests and assessments in these aspects. Therefore, a certain degree of restriction on previous students is conducive to colleges and universities to select new students who are more in line with the educational philosophy and professional requirements of colleges and universities.

Second, restricting former students from taking the college entrance examination can also help improve the efficiency of the use of educational resources. The limited nature of educational resources is a fact that cannot be ignored, and the number of places admitted to the college entrance examination is limited every year. If former students can also apply for the exam, it will occupy the quota that originally belonged to fresh graduates, thus increasing the difficulty for fresh graduates to enter the university of their choice. Therefore, colleges and universities should restrict the application of former students to the examination in order to distribute educational resources fairly.

Factors to consider before choosing to repeat.

In the face of the restrictions of colleges and universities and the practical dilemma, students and parents should consider several aspects before choosing to repeat.

First, find out what is required of repeaters in secondary school in your area. Restrictions on alumni may vary from region to region, so be sure to understand before making a decision. In some areas, public high schools may prohibit the enrollment of former students in order to reduce the number of former students in public high schools. In other regions, repeaters may face a reduction in the number of colleges and universities and courses available, although repeating is allowed. All of these policies have an impact on a student's decision to enroll, so it's important to have a clear understanding of the restrictions in your area.

Second, make a decision based on your own situation. If a student has been admitted to a university but chooses to repeat his or her studies instead of reporting to the school, this decision should be reasonably assessed on an individual basis. Factors such as students' psychological and stress tolerances, family and financial situation, as well as their own performance and development potential should be taken into account. The road to repetition is not smooth, and it requires sufficient perseverance and perseverance on the part of candidates, as well as the support and guidance of parents. Therefore, before making a decision, be sure to fully consider your current situation and weigh the pros and cons.

Reflections and reflections on restricting former students from taking exams.

Measures to prevent former students from taking the examination will help to maintain the fairness of the college entrance examination on the one hand, and on the other hand, it will also help the rational allocation of educational resources. From the point of view of educational equity, it is necessary to limit the possibility of former students taking the exam. If former students can choose to repeat their studies, it will take the places of other eligible students, making it more difficult for new students who are not admitted to the ideal university. This unfair phenomenon is not in line with the original intention of the college entrance examination, nor is it in line with the principle of educational fairness.

On the other hand, restricting former students from taking exams can also make more rational use of educational resources. When colleges and universities admit students, they not only consider the students' grades, but also include interviews, physical fitness tests, physical examinations, political examinations and other assessments. The situation of previous graduates cannot fully meet these requirements, and fresh graduates are more likely to have these advantages and are more suitable for training in colleges and universities. Therefore, restricting former students from applying for the examination is conducive to colleges and universities to select more suitable students and improve the efficiency of the use of educational resources.

However, restricting the admission of old students has also caused some controversy. Some alumni may have better Xi ability and grades, and are more adaptable to colleges and universities. For these alumni, choosing to retake is a matter of effort and persistence in dreams, not simply absorbing resources. Therefore, when formulating relevant policies, it is necessary to take into account the special circumstances of different individuals and make flexible adjustments to a certain extent.

In general, the purpose of restricting former students from taking the exam is to maintain the fairness of the advanced level exam and the rational use of educational resources. Students and caregivers should fully understand the policy and their own circumstances and make rational choices when faced with the decision to retake the exam. Universities and education-related departments should also give full consideration to fairness and individual differences when formulating policies, so as to provide students with better development opportunities and a level playing field.

Related Pages