Strengthening the governance of enforcement sources is an inevitable requirement for advancing the effective resolution of enforcement difficulties and continuously improving the level of enforcement work. Since the beginning of this year, the Yuepuhu County People's Court has adhered to the principle of "putting the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism in the forefront", actively explored new measures for the governance of the source of enforcement, strengthened the coordination and docking between the case-filing, trial and enforcement departments, formed a joint force within the court to solve the difficulty of enforcement, turned "fighting alone" into departmental linkage, and transformed "end enforcement" into "governance at the source", which not only quickly protected the legitimate rights and interests of the winning parties in accordance with the law, but also ran out of the "acceleration" of enforcement It has also saved judicial resources and improved the public's satisfaction with the work of the courts.
On February 22, 2022, I borrowed 9,000 yuan from my good friend Sai because of business, and when borrowing, the two parties agreed to repay the loan before August 22, 2022. In the end, the conflict was successfully mediated. With years of work experience, the judge considered that the case had the potential to be successfully resolved at the front end of the enforcement proceedings. Subsequently, the judge contacted me and his relatives many times, patiently explained the law to him, and informed him of the legal consequences of not performing the effective judgment, and under the judge's patient mediation, I took 9,000 yuan and handed it over to Sai on the same day, and finally the case was completed before entering the enforcement procedure.
In order to strengthen the "source control" of the governance of the enforcement source, the people of Yuepuhu County actively promoted the pre-implementation of the notification procedure, adhered to the principle of "who handles it, who notifies the performance", and served the "Notice of Pre-enforcement Supervision and Performance of Obligations" to the parties to the effective case, further informing them that they should perform the obligations determined by the effective legal documents on time, reminding the obligors to take the initiative to perform the obligations determined by the effective legal documents within the performance period, and explaining to them the economic risks they will face if they do not take the initiative to perform. Credit risk and judicial risk effectively reduce the link of enforcement and service, and break through the barriers to effective connection between trial and enforcement. At the same time, it is clear that positive encouragement will be given to parties who abide by the contract in good faith, and a certificate of automatic performance will be issued to urge the parties to take the initiative to perform.
Recently, the Seyeke People's Court of the Yuepuhu County People's Court successfully resolved 4 cases by urging performance before enforcement, cashed out 22,310 yuan of the case money, and timely cashed out the winning rights and interests of the winning parties. (Song Yulong, Aizezi Awuti).